Evaluasi Keterampilan Menulis Makalah Pada Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar

Authors

  • Muhammad Syazali Universitas Mataram, Indonesia
  • I Ketut Widiade Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, FKIP Universitas Mataram, Indonesia
  • Nursaptini Nursaptini Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, FKIP Universitas Mataram, Indonesia
  • Ni Luh Putu Nina S Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, FKIP Universitas Mataram, Indonesia
  • Hasnawati Hasnawati Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, FKIP Universitas Mataram, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v6i3.2775

Keywords:

Evaluations, Skills, Writing, Papers.

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the writing paper skills of students majoring in Elementary School teacher education study program. The research method used descriptive quantitative. The population of this study was 90 groups of students who programmed the Learning Outcomes Evaluation course. The sample consisted of 10 groups of students selected by purposive sampling based on the theme of their papers. The data were collected from the papers they compiled. Aspects that were evaluated are the systematics, introduction, discussion, conclusions, and references used. Additional data collected were the students’ assessment data on other group papers. The results of the analysis show that the degree of mastery of students in compiling papers was in a sufficient category. The ability to assess papers was still low. The difficulty lied in conformity to the template, writing the background, using sources, and presenting data in the form of tables or figures. All of these aspects were categorized as very low. This information can be used as a reference in developing a lecture system that can facilitate students to develop their skills in compiling papers.

References

Adams, N. E. (2015). Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive learning objectives. J. Med. Libr. Assoc., 103(3), 152–153. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.103.3.010

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2010). Kerangka Landasan untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, dan Asesmen. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Andini, T. E., Hidayat, S., Fadillah, E. N., Permana, T. I., Palembang, M., Sumatra, S., Malang, M., & Java, E. (2018). Scientific process skills: preliminary study towards senior high school student in Palembang. Indonesian Journal of Biology Education, 4(3), 243–250.

Ayu Maningrum, R., & Syarafuddin, H. (2018). Pengaruh Teknik Role Playing Terhadap Kecemasan Belajar pada Siswa Kelas VIII di SMPN 2 Praya. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran, 4(2), 198-205. doi:https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v4i2.1130

Can, B., Yildiz-Demirtas, V., & Altun, E. (2017). The effect of project- based science education programme on scientific process skills and conceptions of Kindergarten students. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(3), 395–413.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education (6th ed.). London, New York: Routllege Falmer.

Darmawan, I. P. A., & Sujoko, E. (2013). Revisi taksonomi pembelajaran Benyamin S. Bloom. Satya Widya, 29(1), 30–39.

Derilo, R. C. (2019). Basic and integrated science process skills acquisition and science achievment of seventh-grade learners. European Journal of Education Studies, 6(1), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2652545

Gularso, D., Sugito, & Zamroni. (2019). Kawruh Pamomong: Children education based on local wisdom in Yogyakarta. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(2), 343–355. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i2.21556

Hadi, W. P., & Ahied, M. (2017). Kajian etnosains Madura dalam proses produksi garam sebagai media pembelajaran IPA Terpadu. Rekayasa, 10(2), 79–86.

Hijjati, E. (2011). Keanekaragaman amfibi (ordo anura) di TWA Suranadi. Universitas Mataram.

Husna, N. (2019). Developing students’ critical thinking through an integrated extensive reading program. TEFLIN Journal, 30(2), 212–230. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v30i2/212-230

Irwanto, Rohaeti, E., & Prodjosantoso, A. K. (2018). Undergraduate students’ science process skills in terms of some variables: a perspective from indonesia. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(5), 751–764.

Mulyono, D., & Elly S., A. (2020). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Reciprocal Teaching dan Student Facilitator and Explaining Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika dengan Mengontrol Kemampuan Awal Siswa. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran, 6(2), 238-250. doi:https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v6i2.2536

Nahak, R., & Bulu, V. (2020). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Berbantu Lembar Kerja Siswa Berbasis Saintifik Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran, 6(2), 230-237. doi:https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v6i2.2369

Narmaditya, B. S., Wulandari, D., & Sakarji, S. R. B. (2018). Does problem-based learning improve critical thinking skills. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 37(3), 378–388.

Nuriyah, N. (2014). Evaluasi pembelajaran: sebuah kajian teori. Jurnal Edueksos, 3(1), 73–86.

Özelçi, S. Y., & Çalışkan, G. (2019). What is critical thinking? A longitudinal study with teacher candidates. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(3), 495–509. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i3.20254

Persadha, D. A. K. (2016). Studi kompetensi kemampuan menulis di kalangan mahasiswa. MUADDIB, 06(01), 1–20.

Perwitasari, T., Sudarmin, & Linuwih, S. (2017). Peningkatan literasi sains melalui pembelajaran energi dan perubahannya bermuatan etnosains pada pengasapan ikan. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 1(2), 62–70.

Praptanti, I., & Noorliana. (2017). Analisis kemampuan menulis argumentasi pada makalah ilmiah mahasiswa farmasi Universitas Muhamadiyah Purwokerto. Jurnal Sains Sosial Dan Humaniora, 1(2), 137–146.

Rosidin, U., Kadaritna, N., & Hasnunidah, N. (2019). Can argument-driven inquiry models have impact on critical thinking skills for students with different personality types? Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(3), 511–526. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i3.24725

Schleicher, A. (2019). PISA 2018: Insights and Interpretations. EOCD.

Silay, I., & Celik, P. (2013). Evaluation of scientific process skills of teacher candidates. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Science, 106, 1122–1130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.126

Suherman, W. S., Dapan, Guntur, & Muktiani, N. R. (2019). Development of traditional children play based instructional model to optimize development of kindergarteners’ fundamental motor skill. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(2), 356–365. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i2.25289

Suryadi, D. (2010). Didactical Design Research (DDR) dalam Pengembangan Pembelajaran Matematika. Seminar Nasional Pembelajaran MIPA, November, 1–75.

Suryadi, S., & Gunawan, I. (2018). Pengaruh Teknik Asertif Training Terhadap Sikap Tanggung Jawab Pada Siswa MTs. Penyaring Kabupaten Sumbawa Besar. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran, 4(1), 103-108. doi:https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v4i1.907

Tim Penyusun. (2017). Panduan penulisan skripsi Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Mataram. Mataram: FKIP Universitas Mataram.

Tim Penyusun. (2019). Rubrik Penilaian Program Studi Kehutanan. Makasar: Fakultas Kehutanan Universitas Hasanudin.

Widodo, A., Jailani, A. K., Novitasari, S., Sutisna, D., Erfan, M., Studi, P., Fkip, P., & Mataram, U. (2020). Analisis kemampuan menulis makalah mahasiswa baru PGSD Universitas Mataram. Jurnal DIDIKA: Wahana Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, VI(1), 77–91.

Widyastuti, S. (2018). Fostering critical thinking skills through argumentative writing. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 37(2), 182–189.

Zuchdi, D., & Nurhadi. (2019). Culture based teaching and learning for Indonesian as a foreign language in Yogyakarta. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(3), 465–476. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i3.26297

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2020-11-06

How to Cite

Syazali, M., Widiade, I. K., Nursaptini, N., Putu Nina S, N. L., & Hasnawati, H. (2020). Evaluasi Keterampilan Menulis Makalah Pada Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Kependidikan, 6(3), 546–556. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v6i3.2775

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 3 (2020): November

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities tacitly or explicitly of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.

Copyright
Authors who publish with JK agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Licensing for Data Publication

JK use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.