Leadership for Innovation in Digital Teaching: A Meta-Analysis Review of Principals’ Influence on Teachers’ Innovative Work Behavior

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v12i1.19714

Keywords:

principals' leadership, innovative work behavior, technology-mediated learning, meta-analysis, visionary leadership

Abstract

This study aims to examine the overall effect of principals’ leadership on teachers’ innovative work behavior, compare the relative strength of different leadership styles, and assess heterogeneity and potential publication bias within the post-2015 digital education context. A meta-analysis of 26 quantitative studies (k = 26) indexed in Scopus between 2015 and 2025 was conducted using a random-effects model. The inclusion criteria were: (1) empirical quantitative studies; (2) examination of the relationship between principals’ leadership and teachers’ innovative work behavior; (3) provision of statistical data convertible into effect sizes; and (4) publication in Scopus-indexed journals. Statistical indicators (r, t, and F values) were converted into standardized effect sizes and analyzed using JASP to estimate pooled effects, heterogeneity indices, and publication bias statistics. The results indicate that (1) there is a very high level of heterogeneity across studies (I² > 98%); (2) all leadership styles demonstrate a positive and significant effect on teachers’ innovative work behavior (p < 0.001), with visionary leadership showing the largest effect size relative to participative, transformational, and ethical leadership styles (r = 0.641); and (3) publication bias tests using the Egger test and Fail-safe N reveal no significant indication of publication bias. These findings indicate that principals’ leadership is a significant factor in promoting teachers’ innovative work behavior in technology-mediated learning environments; however, the magnitude of its impact varies substantially across contextual conditions.

References

Almessabi, A. (2025). The Role of Principals’ Leadership Behaviors in Stimulating Teachers’ Innovative Work Behavior: A Correlational Study. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v31i1.9882

Bao, Y. (2024). The Effect Of Principal Transformational Leadership On Teacher Innovative Behavior: The Moderator Role Of Uncertainty Avoidance And The Mediated Role Of The Sense Of Meaning At Work. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1378615

Berkovich, I., & Hassan, T. (2025). Principals’ digital transformational leadership, teachers’ commitment, and school effectiveness. Education Inquiry, 16(2), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2023.2173705

Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: a systematic evidence map. In International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education (Vol. 17, Number 1). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8

Borenstein, M. (2023). How to Understand and Report Heterogeneity in a Meta-Analysis: The Difference Between I-Squared and Prediction Intervals. Integrative Medicine Research, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2023.101014

Bush, T. (2020). Theories of Educational Leadership and Management.

Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2014). School leadership models: What Do We Know? In School Leadership and Management (Vol. 34, Number 5, pp. 553–571). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2014.928680

Choi, G. J., & Kang, H. (2025). Heterogeneity In Meta-Analyses: An Unavoidable Challenge Worth Exploring. In Korean Journal of Anesthesiology (Vol. 78, Number 4, pp. 301–314). Korean Society of Anesthesiologists. https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.25001

Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2014). Resilient Teachers, Resilient Schools Building and Sustaining Quality In Testing Times.

Eyal, O., & Roth, G. (2011). Principals’ Leadership and Teachers’ Motivation: Self-Determination Theory Analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(3), 256–275. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111129055

Fullan, M. (n.d.). .4 A U S DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION.

Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for Learning: Lessons from 40 Years of Empirical Research. In Journal of Educational Administration (Vol. 49, Number 2, pp. 125–142). https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111116699

Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010). Collaborative Leadership and School Improvement: Understanding The Impact On School Capacity and Student learning. School Leadership and Management, 30(2), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632431003663214

Hidayat, R., & Patras, Y. E. (2022). The Effect of Principals’ Leadership and Learning Organization on Teachers’ Innovative Work Behavior During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 7(1), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v7i1.11355

Honig, M. I., & Rainey, L. R. (2023). From tinkering to transformation: How school district central offices drive equitable teaching and learning. Harvard Education Press.

Hsieh, C. C., Tai, S. E., & Li, H. C. (2024). Impact of school leadership on teacher innovativeness: evidence from multilevel analysis of Taiwan TALIS 2018. Asia Pacific Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2024.2397040

Kallapadee, Y., Tesaputa, K., & Somprach, K. (2017). Strengthening the Creative Transformational Leadership of Primary School Teachers. International Education Studies, 10(4), 179. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n4p179

Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Lim, W. Y. (2017). Teacher Professional Development for TPACK-21CL: Effects on Teacher ICT Integration and Student Outcomes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(2), 172–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633116656848

Komariah, A., Kurniady, D. A., Abdullah, Z., & ... (2023). Elementary School Principal Participative Leadership: Coordination in Character Education Implementation. Padang International …. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-11-4_2

Leithwood, K., & Sun, J. (2012). The Nature and Effects of Transformational School Leadership: A Meta-Analytic Review of Unpublished Research. In Educational Administration Quarterly (Vol. 48, Number 3, pp. 387–423). https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11436268

Liao, W., Wang, X., & Qin, K. (2021). Learning to Become Culturally Responsive Teacher Educators In An Internationalized Doctoral Course: A Video-Cued Interpretive study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103339

Lin, Q., Zhao, S., Gao, D., Lou, Y., Yang, S., Musa, S. S., Wang, M. H., Cai, Y., Wang, W., Yang, L., & He, D. (2020). A conceptual model for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in Wuhan, China with individual reaction and governmental action. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 93, 211–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.02.058

Little, T. D. (2024). Sample Chapter: Longitudinal Structural Equation Modeling: Second Edition. www.guilford.com/p/little

Lu, C., Xu, Z., & Tian, Q. (2025). Teachers’ Well-Being and Innovative Work Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model of Perceived Insider Status and Principal Authentic Leadership. Behavioral Sciences, 15(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15101419

Martínez, M. M., Molina-López, M. M., & de Cabo, R. M. (2021). Explaining The Gender Gap In School Principalship: A Tale Of Two Sides. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 49(6), 863–882. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220918258

Messmann, G. (n.d.). Innovative work behaviour Investigating the nature and facilitation of vocational teachers’ contributions to innovation development vorgelegt von. Retrieved http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs12186-010-9049-y

Migliavaca, C. B., Stein, C., Colpani, V., Barker, T. H., Ziegelmann, P. K., Munn, Z., & Falavigna, M. (2022). Meta-Analysis of Prevalence: I2 Statistic and How to Deal With Heterogeneity. Research Synthesis Methods, 13(3), 363–367. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1547

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 134, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.001

Qi, W., Zhang, Y., & Arshad, M. Z. (2025). Sustainable education in action: Principal leadership, teacher wellbeing, and altruism in the sports context. Acta Psychologica, 254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104846

Redecker, C., & Punie, Y. (n.d.). European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators.

Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2016). Teacher Stress and Teacher Self-Efficacy as Predictors of Engagement, Emotional Exhaustion, and Motivation to Leave the Teaching Profession. Creative Education, 07(13), 1785–1799. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2016.713182

Stevens, T. M., Day, I. N. Z., den Brok, P. J., Prins, F. J., Assen, H. J. H. E., ter Beek, M., Bombaerts, G., Coppoolse, R., Cremers, P. H. M., Engbers, R., Hulsen, M., Kamp, R. J. A., Koksma, J. J., Mittendorff, K., Riezebos, J., van der Rijst, R. M., van de Wiel, M. W. J., & Vermunt, J. D. (2024). Teacher professional learning and development in the context of educational innovations in higher education: A typology of practices. Higher Education Research and Development, 43(2), 437–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2023.2246412

Thurlings, M., Evers, A. T., & Vermeulen, M. (2015). Toward a Model of Explaining Teachers’ Innovative Behavior: A Literature Review. Review of Educational Research, 85(3), 430–471. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314557949

Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers and Education, 59(1), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.009

Yang, S., & Berdine, G. (2021). Publication bias in meta-analysis. The Southwest Respiratory and Critical Care Chronicles, 9(41), 67–70. https://doi.org/10.12746/swrccc.v9i41.945

Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in Organizations.

Zhang, L., Fu, X., Luo, D., Xing, L., & Du, Y. (2021). Musical Experience Offsets Age-Related Decline in Understanding Speech-in-Noise: Type of Training Does Not Matter, Working Memory Is the Key. Ear and Hearing, 42(2), 258–270. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000921

Downloads

Published

2026-03-14

How to Cite

Umalihayati, Fajari, L. E. W., Mutoharoh, Nuryati, & Ma’arif, M. (2026). Leadership for Innovation in Digital Teaching: A Meta-Analysis Review of Principals’ Influence on Teachers’ Innovative Work Behavior. Jurnal Kependidikan : Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran, Dan Pembelajaran, 12(1), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v12i1.19714

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): March

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities tacitly or explicitly of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.

Copyright
Authors who publish with JK agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Licensing for Data Publication

JK use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.