A Multidimensional Mapping of Early Childhood Teachers’ Assessment Literacy and Barriers to Authentic Assessment Implementation: Evidence from Semarang City
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v12i2.20311Keywords:
assessment literacy, early childhood education, authentic assessment, teachers, play-based learning, Pedagogical Decision-MakingAbstract
This study aims to map the level of assessment literacy among early childhood education (ECE) teachers in Semarang City and to identify the challenges associated with implementing authentic assessment. The study employed a quantitative approach with a descriptive design. The sample consisted of 583 ECE teachers selected through proportionate random sampling. The instrument used was a Likert-scale questionnaire measuring five dimensions: assessment understanding, planning and implementation, recording and data processing, supporting and inhibiting factors, and professional development. The questionnaire was developed based on construct validity procedures and pilot-tested on 30 respondents. Of the initial 31 statement items, 23 were declared valid, with validity coefficients ranging from 0.392 to 0.691. The reliability test produced a Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient of 0.871, indicating high reliability. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, including percentages and frequency distributions. The findings indicate that teachers’ assessment literacy is at a moderate level, with stronger technical competence than conceptual and analytical competence. Teachers still experience difficulties in understanding fundamental assessment concepts, determining developmental indicators, and interpreting assessment results for instructional decision-making. In addition, major challenges arise from structural factors, such as limited time, inadequate facilities, insufficient institutional support, and unequal access to professional development opportunities. This study contributes by providing a multidimensional profile of assessment literacy encompassing conceptual, technical, analytical, structural, and professional aspects. The findings may serve as a foundation for the development of a contextual play-based assessment model.
References
Adie, L., Wyatt-Smith, C., Finch, M., & DeLuca, C. (2024). Evidence of teacher assessment work and its relationship to their assessment identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104518
Baier-Mosch, F., Schulze-Vorberg, L., Horz, H., & Kunter, M. (2024). Exploring the suitability of self-reports to gain insights into teachers’ technological pedagogical knowledge. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101402
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 25(6), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807
Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational Assessment Knowledge and Skills for Teachers (Vol. 30, Number 1). http://www.unl.edu/buros/bimm/html/article3.html.
Christie, P., & Lingard, B. (2020). Teachers and schooling making a difference: Productive pedagogies, assessment and performance. api.taylorfrancis.com. https://api.taylorfrancis.com/content/books/mono/download?identifierName=doi&identifierValue=10.4324/9781003117643&type=googlepdf
Creswell, J. W. , & C. J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., & (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Appliedhttps://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
DeLuca, C., Rickey, N., & Coombs, A. (2021a). Exploring assessment across cultures: Teachers’ approaches to assessment in the U.S., China, and Canada. Cogent Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1921903
DeLuca, C., Rickey, N., & Coombs, A. (2021b). Exploring assessment across cultures: Teachers’ approaches to assessment in the U.S., China, and Canada. Cogent Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1921903
Hadyaoui, A., & Cheniti-Belcadhi, L. (2023). Ontology-based group assessment analytics framework for performances prediction in project-based collaborative learning. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00262-w
Hull, P., & Vígh, T. (2026). Preservice teachers’ assessment literacy: A systematic review. In Studies in Educational Evaluation (Vol. 89). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2026.101600
Kainulainen, J., & Tarnanen, M. (2026). Becoming an assessment-literate teacher in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105341
Lally, S., Banasik-Jemielniak, N., Haman, E., & Antonijevic, S. (2025). Language assessment of Polish-English bilingual children by speech and language therapists who do not speak Polish: A feasibility study of a novel scoring schema for Sentence-Repetition-Tasks. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 60(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.70005
Looney, A., Cumming, J., van Der Kleij, F., & Harris, K. (2018). Reconceptualising the role of teachers as assessors: teacher assessment identity. In Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice (Vol. 25, Number 5, pp. 442–467). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2016.1268090
Louis Cohen, L. M. and K. M. (2018). Research Methods in Education. https://staibabussalamsula.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Louis-Cohen-Lawrence-Manion-Keith-Morrison-Research-Methods-in-Education-Routledge-2018-staibabussalamsula.ac_.id_.pdf
Madigan, S., Browne, D., Racine, N., Mori, C., & ... (2019). Association between screen time and children’s performance on a developmental screening test. JAMA https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/article-abstract/2722666
Mohammed, A. H., Nigussie, B., Schellens, T., & Rotsaert, T. (2026). Play-Based Learning in Early Childhood Education: A Scoping Review. In Early Childhood Education Journal. Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-026-02127-6
Popham, W. J. (2014). Classroom Assessment: What Teachers Nedd To Know (seventh). Pearson Education Limited.
Pyle, A., & DeLuca, C. (2017). Assessment in play-based kindergarten classrooms: An empirical study of teacher perspectives and practices. The Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2015.1118005
Rakhmayani, K. F. (2023). Performance Assessment Used by Teacher in Students’ Writing Skill at Grade X Senior High School of Lingga Kepulauan Riau. … Conference on Languages and Arts (ICLA https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/icla-22/125993064
Rumpoko, A. U. T., & Diana, D. (2022). Kesiapan Kompetensi Guru PAUD dalam Menyongsong Pendidikan AUD di Era Society 5.0. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 6(6), 6641–6650. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v6i6.3023
Susantini, E., Sari, Y. M., Asteria, P. V, & Marzuqi, M. I. (2025). Proving Content Validity of Android-Based Higher Order Thinking Skill Assessment for Science and Mathematics Preservice Teacher. Journal of Education and …. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1457123
Xu, Y., & Brown, G. T. L. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy in practice: A reconceptualization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.010
Yan, Z., & Pastore, S. (2022). Are teachers literate in formative assessment? The development and validation of the Teacher Formative Assessment Literacy Scale. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101183
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities tacitly or explicitly of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with JK agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
-
Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






