Analysis of the Ability of Junior High School Students to Solve the Physics Problems in Various Forms of Problem Representations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/j-lkf.v8i1.2682Keywords:
Solve physics problems, problem representationAbstract
This research is a descriptive study with a qualitative approach, which aims to describe the ability of junior high school students to solve physics problems in various forms of problem representation. The subjects in this study were the IX grade junior high school students in six Palu city schools. Respondents for interviews in the study amounted to 4 people for each form of problem representation, with the criteria of students who answered right, students who answered ± 50% correct, students who answered incorrectly, and who did not answer. The instrument used was a test of problem solving skills and interviews. The data obtained were analyzed qualitatively including data reduction, presenting data and verification while descriptive analysis was performed by calculating the total score, calculating the percentage and categorizing problem solving abilities. The results obtained by the average ability of junior high school students to solve physics problems in various forms of problem representation 21.86% (less category), with the percentage of each form of representation ie verbal representation 36.09% (less category), image/picture representation 23.78% (less category), diagram representation 19.47% (poor category) and graphic representation 8.10% (poor category).References
Ana, S., Andreja, B., Maja, P., Marko, M., & Marijan, P. (2019). Role of diagrams in problem solving: An evaluation of eye-tracking. Physical Review Education Research, 15, 1-6.
Ana, S., Andreja, B., Petra, M., Maja, P., & Marijan, P. (2017). Graphical representations of data improve student understanding of measurement and uncertainty: An eye-tracking study. Physical Review Education Research, 13(2), 1-20.
Ana, S., Andreja, B., Elizabeta, K., Maja P., & Marijan P. (2018). Student understanding of graph slope and area under a graph: A comparison of physics and nonphysics students. Physical Review Education Research, 14, 1-15
Anton, S., Sunyoto, E., & Ian, Y. (2016). Analisis kesulitan siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah fisika berbentuk grafik. Unnes Physics Education Journal, 5(3), 32-39.
Docktor, J. L., & Mastre, J. P. (2014). Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics. Phisical Review Special Topics -Physics Education Research, 10, 1-58.
Haratua, T., & Judyanto, S. (2016). Representations based physics instruction to enhance students’ problem solving. American Journal of Educational Research, 4(1), 1-4.
Laras, W., Siswoyo, & Fauzi, B. (2015). Pendekatan multi representasi. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 1(1), 31-38.
Mehmet, A. K., & Ayesegul, S. A. (2014). Effectiveness of multiple representations for learning energy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 627-632.
Nina, L., & Heru, K. (2018). Improving the competence of diagrammatic and argumentative representation in physics through android-based mobile learning application. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 106-122.
Polya, G., 1971. How to solve It (Second Edition). New Jersey: Princeton University Press
Rismatul, A., Lia, Y., & Eni, L. (2015). The physic problem solving difficulties on high school student. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya, 5(2), 44-50.
Suci, A., Yusuf, H., & Cecil, H. (2017). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa pada pembelajaran matematika menggunakan strategi abduktif-deduktif di SMA Negeri 1 Indralaya Utara. Jurnal Elemen, 3(1), 25-34.
Suhandi, A., Wibowo, F. (2012). Pendekatan multi representasi dalam pembelajaran usaha-energi dan dampak terhadap pemahaman konsep mahasiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 18, 1-7.
Sujarwanto, E., Hidayat, A., & Wartono. (2014). Kemampuan memecahkan masalah fisika pada modeling instruction pada siswa SMA Kelas XI. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 3(1), 65-78.
Wahyuddin. (2016). Analisis kemampuan menyelesaikan soal cerita matematika ditinjau dari kemampuan verbal. Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 9(2), 148-160.
Zhongzhou, C., Neset, D., Young Jeng, C., & David, E. (2017). To draw or not to draw? Examining the necessity of problem diagrams using massive open online course eksperiment. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13, 1-12.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Lensa: Jurnal Kependidikan Fisika agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in Lensa: Jurnal Kependidikan Fisika, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
