Exploring Pre-Service Teachers’ Critical Thinking and Mathematical Beliefs Through Contextual Problem Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v14i2.18754Keywords:
Critical thinking, Contextual problems, Mathematical beliefs, VignetteAbstract
The ability to create contextual problems is essential for pre-service teachers. However, many teachers simply adapt or adopt existing problems when creating contextual problems. This study aims to explore the critical thinking skills in analysing contextual problems and the mathematical beliefs that underlie the analysis process. This qualitative study involved 40 pre-service primary school teacher participants, with four participants selected for in-depth interviews. The research instruments included vignettes, interview guidelines, and observation sheets. The data were validated using triangulation methods. The study indicates that pre-service primary school teachers can be categorised into non-critical thinkers (35 participants), emergent critical thinkers (3 participants), and advanced critical thinkers (2 participants). Non-critical thinkers demonstrate an ability to understand problems that they have previously studied, as their understanding constrained to the formulae and procedures demonstrated by their teachers. Emergent critical thinkers showed the ability to question the problem formulation and evaluate its contextual relevance, although their reasoning remained influenced by teacher authority. Advanced critical thinkers are characterised by a high level of critical thinking aptitude, often attributed to their perception of mathematics as a discipline rooted in logical reasoning.
References
Açıkgöz, M., & Yıldız, Z. (2025). Bridging Early Mathematics and Real-Life Applications in Elementary Classrooms. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 9(3), 190–201. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202533192
Akhsani, L., Kartono, K., Junaedi, I., & Asih, T. S. N. (2025). Creative Thinking Process of Prospective Mathematics Teacher Students in Solving Numerical Problems. Educational Process International Journal, 19(1), 1–30.
Applebaum, M. (2025). Fostering creative and critical thinking through math games: A case study of Bachet’s game. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/15825
As’ari, A. R., Mahmudi, A., & Nuerlaelah, E. (2017). Our Prospective Mathematics Teachers are not Critical Thinkers Yet. Journal on Mathematics Education, 8(2), 145–156. http://dx.doi.org/10.22342/jme.8.2.3961.145-156
Bekiroğlu, D., & Güllühan, N. Ü. (2024). A Holistic Examination of The Relationship between Greek Textbooks and Real Life. International Journal of Whole Schooling, 20(1), 101–127.
Berisha, V., Ferizi-Miftari, J., & Klinaku, J. (2020). Features of Tasks in Teacher-Made Mathematics Tests for Classroom Assessment. International Journal of Assessment and Evaluation, 28(1), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7920/CGP/v28i01/33-49
Desfitri, R. (2018). Pre-service Teachers’ Challenges in Presenting Mathematical Problems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 948, 012035. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/948/1/012035
Ekmekci, A., Corkin, D. M., & Fan, We. (2019). A Multilevel Analysis of the Impact of Teachers’ Beliefs and Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching on Students’ Mathematics Achievement. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 44(12), 57–80. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2019v44n12.4
Ennis, R. H. (2018). Critical Thinking Across the Curriculum: A Vision. Topoi, 37(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9401-4
Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. The California Academy Press.
Furtado, P. G. F., Hirashima, T., Hayashi, Y., & Maeda, K. (2019). Application Focused on Structural Comprehension of Mathematics Contextual Problems for Kindergarten Students. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 14(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-019-0096-1
Gök, B., Temizyürek, F., Baş, Ö., & Sirem, Ö. (2021). Feridun Oral’s children’s books’ peritextual features and their text readability levels. Turkish Journal of Education, 10(2), 125–138.
Goto, J., & du Toit, E. (2025). University Students’ Acceptance of Hybrid Learning at a South African University. The International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, Vol. 21, 16–39.
Habók, A., Magyar, A., Németh, M. B., & Csapó, B. (2020). Motivation and Self-Related Beliefs as Predictors of Academic Achievement in Reading and Mathematics: Structural Equation Models of Longitudinal Data. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, 101634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101634
Hidayatullah, A., & Csíkos, C. (2022). Mathematics Related Belief System and Word Problem-Solving in the Indonesian Context. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(4), em2094. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11902
Jaffe, J. B., & Bolger, D. J. (2023). Cognitive Processes, Linguistic Factors, and Arithmetic Word Problem Success: A Review of Behavioral Studies. Educational Psychology Review, 35(4), 105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09821-6
Jankvist, U. T., & Niss, M. (2018). Counteracting Destructive Student Misconceptions of Mathematics. Education Sciences, 8(2), 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8020053
Jonsson, B., Granberg, C., & Lithner, J. (2020). Gaining Mathematical Understanding: The Effects of Creative Mathematical Reasoning and Cognitive Proficiency. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(574366). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.574366
Kadir, K., Zuhry, K., Cahyono, E., La Hadi, A., & Jafar. (2020). The Ability of Prospective Teachers to Pose Contextual Word Problem About Fractions Addition. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1581, 012025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1581/1/012025
Kasa, Y., Areaya, S., & Woldemichael, M. (2024). Mathematics Teachers’ Beliefs About Mathematics, its Teaching, and Learning: The Case of Five Teachers. Pedagogical Research, 9(2), em0191. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/14172
Khusna, A. K., Siswono, T. Y. E., & Wijayanti, P. (2024). Mathematical Problem Design to Explore Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Collaborative Problem Solving. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 16(3), 217–240.
Mairing, J. P. (2020). Mathematical Problem-Solving Behaviors of The Routine Solver. International Journal of Education, 13(2), 105–122.
Murniasih, T. R., Sa’dijah, C., Muksar, M., & Susiswo, S. (2020). Fraction Sense: An Analysis of Preservice Mathematics Teachers’ Cognitive Obstacles. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 10(2), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.742
Noble, H., & Heale, R. (2019). Triangulation in Research, with Examples. Evidence Based Nursing, 22(3), 67–68. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2019-103145
Philipp, R. (2007). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and affect. Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 257–315.
Purnomo, E. A., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., Junaedi, I., & Agoestanto, A. (2024). Stages of Problem-Solving in Answering HOTS-Based Questions in Differential Calculus Courses. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 15(16), 116–145.
Raditya, A., & Iskandar, R. (2021). Analysis of Mathematics Problems in the 2013 Curriculum and Cambridge Curriculum Mathematics Textbooks. KALAMATIKA Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6, 99–110. https://doi.org/10.22236/KALAMATIKA.vol6no1.2021pp99-110
Rahaju, R., Murniasih, T. R., Sumaji, S., & Muchtadi, M. (2024). Hambatan Didaktis Berpikir Kritis dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika. Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 712–722. https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v4i2.1672
Rahaju, R., Purwanto, P., Parta, I. N., & Rahardjo, S. (2019a). Misconception of Triangle Concept Through Epistemological Mathematics Belief. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1118, 012076. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012076
Rahaju, R., Purwanto, P., Parta, I. N., & Rahardjo, S. (2019b). Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Making Mathematical Problems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, (1318), 012094. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1318/1/012094
Rocha, H., Viseu, F., & Matos, S. (2024). Problem-Solving in a Real-Life Context: An Approach During The Learning of Inequalities. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(1), 21–37.
Skilling, K., & Stylianides, G. J. (2023). Using Vignettes to Investigate Mathematics Teachers’ Beliefs for Promoting Cognitive Engagement in Secondary Mathematics Classroom Practice. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 55(2), 477–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01431-w
Tambychik, T., & Meerah, T. S. M. (2010). Students’ Difficulties in Mathematics Problem-Solving: What do they Say? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.020
Tarim, K., & Tarku, H. (2022). Investigation of the Questions in 8th Grade Mathematics Textbook in terms of Mathematical Literacy. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(2), 1–10.
Toheri, T., Winarso, W., & Haqq, A. A. (2020). Where Exactly for Enhance Critical and Creative Thinking: The Use of Problem Posing or Contextual Learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 877–887.
Varlık, S. (2024). Critical and Creative Thinking in Science Teachers: The Moderating Role of Epistemology. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 23(5), 964–978. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/24.23.964
Verawati, N. N. S. P., Rokmat, J., Sukarso, A., Harjono, A., & Makhrus, Muh. (2024). Analysis of Students’ Critical Thinking Disposition in Science Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 10(1), 200–210. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v10i1.7127
Vos, P. (2011). What Is ‘Authentic’ in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling? In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. Borromeo Ferri, & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling (Vol. 1, pp. 713–722). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0910-2_68
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rahaju Rahaju, Tatik Retno Murniasih, Sri Hariyani, Hafis Hafis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
