Development of an Instrument to Map Acid–Base Misconceptions among High-Achieving Senior High School Students in Eastern Indonesia

Wiwin Putriawati; Saraswati Haylian Chiani

doi:10.33394/j-ps.v13i4.17646

Authors

Wiwin Putriawati STKIP Paracendekia NW Sumbawa
Saraswati Haylian Chiani STKIP Paracendekia NW Sumbawa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v13i4.17646

Keywords:

Instrument Development, Misconception, Acid–Base, Eastern-Indonesia

Abstract

Acid–base misconceptions remain a persistent challenge in high school chemistry, particularly among high-achieving students in Eastern Indonesia, where instructional strategies often emphasize procedural knowledge over conceptual understanding. Mapping these misconceptions is critical to designing differentiated remediation strategies that promote deep conceptual change. This study aims to map students' misconceptions by developing a diagnostic test instrument named the Acid–Base Misconception Diagnostic Test Instrument (IDM-AB). Research data were obtained through expert validation (three chemistry education experts) and empirical testing, analyzed descriptively using SPSS. Instrument validation included content, construct, and language validity, item analysis (difficulty and point-biserial correlation), and internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.905). The classification of misconceptions was based on the Certainty of Response Index (CRI) with a cutoff of 2.5. The pilot test involved 121 students, and the final test was administered to 123 students. Results show: (1) the IDM-AB instrument meets both theoretical and empirical validity standards; (2) student misconception levels were distributed as follows: moderate (42.86%, 51 students), high (37.82%, 45 students), and low (19.33%, 23 students). Students with high misconceptions require intensive conceptual correction, while those with low misconceptions show potential for scientific conceptual change. This mapping provides a foundation for implementing targeted, concept-specific remediation strategies to address persistent alternative conceptions in acid-base chemistry.

References

Altan, A., & Sener, Z. T. (2023). Developing the Diagnostic Test of Misconceptions of Fractions. In Online Submission. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED638418

Artvinli, E., & Dönmez, L. (2020). How Do Geography Textbooks Deal with Map Skills? A Comparison of Turkey and England. Romanian Review of Geographical Education, 9(2), 23–45.

Atchia, S. M. C., & Gunowa, M. (2025). Use of Concept Cartoons within the Conceptual Change Model to Address Students’ Misconceptions in Biology: A Case Study. Journal of Biological Education, 59(1), 162–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2024.2308305

Behmke, D., Kerven, D., Lutz, R., Paredes, J., Pennington, R., Brannock, E., Deiters, M., Rose, J., & Stevens, K. (2018). Augmented Reality Chemistry: Transforming 2-D Molecular Representations into Interactive 3-D Structures. Proceedings of the Interdisciplinary STEM Teaching and Learning Conference, 2, 5–11.

Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.

Bonett, D. G. (2020). Sample size requirements for Pearson, Kendall, and Spearman correlations. Psychometrika, 85(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-019-09659-9.

Brandriet, A. R., & Bretz, S. L. (2014). Measuring meta-ignorance through the lens of confidence: Examining students’ redox misconceptions about oxidation numbers, charge, and electron transfer. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(4), 729–746. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00129J

Candiasa, I. M., Mertasari, N. M. S., Sastri, N. L. P. P., & Oya, A. (2025). Variation of Problem-Posing Approaches to Improve Learning Outcomes and Problem-Posing Abilities of Prospective Mathematics Teachers. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 12(3), 374–381.

Chen, X. (2024). How Is Teaching Quality Related to Achievement Emotions in Secondary Low- and High-Achieving Students: A Cross-Sectional Study in Chinese Mathematics Classrooms. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 862–880. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12691

Chung, W., & Kim, J. (2024). The Racial Gap in Friendships among High-Achieving Students. EdWorkingPaper No. 24-1025. Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED660151

Dakic, T., Antic, T. C., Jevdjovic, T., Lakic, I., Ruzicic, A., & Vujovic, P. (2025). Balancing Act: Enhancing Student Comprehension of Acid-Base Physiology through Interactive, System-Based Teaching. Advances in Physiology Education, 49(4), 855–861. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00133.2025

Faiman, H. B., & Strouse, G. A. (2025). Perfectionism and Academic Burnout in High-Achieving Undergraduate Students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 69(3), 269–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862251326467

Fu, J., Carlo, A. M., & Zheng, D. (2025). Incorporation of NUPACK-Based Simulation into Classroom and Laboratory Teaching of Nucleic Acids Hybridization for Undergraduate Biochemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 102(7), 3010–3017. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01051

Gkitzia, V., Salta, K., & Tzougraki, C. (2020). Students’ Competence in Translating between Different Types of Chemical Representations. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(1), 307–330. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8rp00301g

Hasan, S., Bagayoko, D., & Kelley, E. L. (1999). Misconceptions and the certainty of response index (CRI). Physics Education, 34(5), 294–299. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/34/5/304.

Hidayat, F. A., Irianti, M., & Faturrahman. (2020). Analisis miskonsepsi siswa pada pembelajaran kimia melalui penggunaan tes diagnostik. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 4(2), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpk.v4i2.12345.

Izza, R. I., Ningsih, D., & Arifin, Z. (2021). Analisis miskonsepsi siswa menggunakan metode CRI pada materi kimia. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 9(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v9i1.18234.

Lestari, D., Nurhayati, E., & Susilawati, S. (2020). Identifikasi miskonsepsi siswa pada materi larutan asam-basa menggunakan instrumen diagnostik. Jurnal Tadris Kimiya, 5(2), 200–210. https://doi.org/10.15575/jtk.v5i2.1234.

Mikander, P., & Satokangas, H. (2025). From Influencing School Food to Handling Hate Speech: Methods, Areas, and Limitations of Active Citizenship in Finnish Social Studies Textbooks. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 20(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/17461979231197409

Mubarak, S., & Yahdi. (2020). Pemetaan miskonsepsi siswa SMA pada konsep asam-basa menggunakan tes diagnostik. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 12(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpkim.v12i1.9876

Muna, I. A. (2016). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa PGMI pada Konsep Hukum Newton Menggunakan Certainty of Response Index (CRI). Cendekia: Journal of Education and Society, 13(2), 309. https://doi.org/10.21154/cendekia.v13i2.251

Nahadi, N., Hendayana, S., & Kartawidjaja, J. (2023). Mapping students’ misconceptions on acid-base concepts through four-tier diagnostic test. Journal of Science Learning, 6(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v6i2.54321

Ningroom, R. A. A., Yamtinah, S., & Riyadi. (2025). A Two-Tier Multiple-Choice Diagnostic Test to Find Student Misconceptions about the Change of Matter. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 19(2), 1144–1156.

Ni Made Ari Suparwati. (2022). Analisis Reduksi Miskonsepsi Kimia dengan Pendekatan Multi Level Representasi: Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 12(2), 341-348. https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm/v12i2.591.

Nugroho, D. M., & Utomo, S. B. (2019). Identifikasi miskonsepsi pada materi asam-basa menggunakan tes diagnostik two-tier dengan model mental pada siswa kelas XII MIPA SMA Negeri 1 Sragen tahun ajaran 2018/2019. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 8(2).

Nurul Nadiah Rosly., Abd. Hamid, S., & Nor Azlina A. Rahman. (2021). Exploring the Perception of Chemistry Students at Kulliyah of Science in Learning Organic Chemistry. IIUM Journal of Educational Studies, 9(2), 6-30. https://doi.org/10.31436/ijes.v9i2.299.

Paillusson, F., & Booth, M. (2025). Embracing Representational Plurality to Bypass Misconceptions in Science Education. Science & Education, 34(4), 1955–1969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00590-4

Pinthong, C., Chaiyen, P., Maenpuen, S., & Chenprakhon, P. (2022). Inquiry-Based Laboratories for Students to Investigate the Concepts of Acid-Base Titration, pK[subscript a], Equivalence Points, and Molar Absorption Coefficients. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(12), 4008–4015. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00319

Potvin, P. (2020). The coexistence claim and its possible implications for success in teaching for conceptual “change.” Journal of Science Education, 42(2), 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1719290.

Raharjo, D., Ramli, M., & Rinanto, Y. (2019). Diagnostic Test Assessment on Protist Misconception. Journal of Biological Education Indonesia (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 5(2), 335–344.

Rokhim, D. A., Widarti, H. R., & Sutrisno. (2024a). Profile of Need Analysis of Five-Tier Diagnostic Instrument Development for High School Chemistry Courses. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 14(2), 140–145.

Rosita, A., Saputra, H., & Yuliana, L. (2020). Analisis miskonsepsi siswa pada konsep kimia dasar menggunakan instrumen tes diagnostik. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 26(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.17977/jip.v26i1.12345.

Rokhim, D. A., Widarti, H. R., & Sutrisno. (2024b). Profile of Need Analysis of Five-Tier Diagnostic Instrument Development for High School Chemistry Courses. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 14(2), 140–145.

Rosenthal, D. P., & Sanger, M. J. (2012). Student misinterpretations and misconceptions based on their explanations of two computer animations of varying complexity depicting the same oxidation–reduction reaction. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13(4), 471–483. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2RP20048A

Sihalolo, E., Marpaung, A., & Manurung, M. (2021). Diagnosing student misconceptions on chemical concepts through diagnostic test. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 5(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpk.v5i1.54321.

Siska, Y., & Pagolongan, G. (2021). Identifikasi miskonsepsi siswa pada materi asam-basa melalui certainty of response index (CRI). Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 9(2), 150–160. https://doi.org/10.31540/jps.v9i2.8765.

Shaafi, N. F., Yusof, M. M. M., Ellianawati, E., Subali, B., & Raji’e, M. H. H. (2025). Investigating Misconceptions about Acids and Bases among Pre-Service Science Teachers. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 19(1), 460–477.

Slapnicar, M., Tompa, V., Glažar, S. A., & Devetak, I. (2018). Fourteen-Year-Old Students’ Misconceptions Regarding the Sub-Micro and Symbolic Levels of Specific Chemical Concepts. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(4), 620–632.

Smith, S. M. (2022). Understanding High School Students’ Misconceptions about Chemistry Using Particulate Level Drawings: Focusing on the Third Angle. In ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC.

Suparman, A. R., Rohaeti, E., & Wening, S. (2024). Student Misconception in Chemistry: A Systematic Literature Review. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 14(2), 238–252.

Suparman, E., Taufik, M., & Ismail, S. (2024). Students’ misconceptions on acid–base concepts: Evidence from four-tier diagnostic tests in Indonesia. Journal of Chemical Education Research, 45(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed4000987.

Suparwati, L. (2022). Penggunaan instrumen diagnostik untuk mengidentifikasi miskonsepsi siswa pada konsep asam-basa. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 14(1), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpk.v14i1.54321.

Suyono. (2020). Pentingnya diagnosis miskonsepsi dalam pembelajaran kimia di SMA. Jakarta: Pustaka Pendidikan.

Tian, J., Koh, J. H. L., Ren, C., & Wang, Y. (2022). Understanding Higher Education Students’ Developing Perceptions of Geocapabilities through the Creation of Story Maps with Geographical Information Systems. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(3), 687–705. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13176

Türkoguz, S. (2020). Investigation of Three-Tier Diagnostic and Multiple Choice Test on Chemistry Concepts with Response Change Behaviour. International Education Studies, 13(9), 10. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v13n9p10.

Vernon, E., & Dunphy, A. (2025). Scaffolding Geography’s Conceptual Ways of Thinking Using “Semantic Waves.” Curriculum Journal, 36(2), 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.294

Putriawati, W. (2016). Validasi instrumen tes diagnostik miskonsepsi menggunakan CVI. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 7(2), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.21009/jep.v7i2.4567.

Putriawati, W. (2016). Pemetaan Tingkat Konflik Kognitif Siswa SMA pada Konsep Asam-Basa (Tesis). UNESA, Surabaya.

Warsito, J. (2021). Identifikasi miskonsepsi siswa pada konsep larutan asam-basa menggunakan four-tier diagnostic test. Jurnal Kimia dan Pendidikan Kimia, 6(1), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.31258/jkpk.v6i1.5432.

Yik, B. J., Schreurs, D. G., & Raker, J. R. (2023). Implementation of an R Shiny App for Instructors: An Automated Text Analysis Formative Assessment Tool for Evaluating Lewis Acid-Base Model Use. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(8), 3107–3113. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00400