Improving Prospective Physics Teachers’ Conceptual Understanding of Moon Phases Through an Integrated Observational and Virtual Simulation Learning

Theo Jhoni Hartanto; Maya Mustika; Gunarjo Suryanto Budi

doi:10.33394/j-ps.v13i4.16338

Authors

Theo Jhoni Hartanto Universitas Palangka Raya http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6680-4229
Maya Mustika Universitas Palangka Raya
Gunarjo Suryanto Budi Universitas Palangka Raya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v13i4.16338

Keywords:

Moon phases, observation, pre-service teachers, virtual simulation

Abstract

Although the moon's phases are directly observable phenomena, students at all levels of education consistently have misconceptions about their causes. This indicates a cognitive gap between observational experience and the scientific models that are supposed to explain it. This study aims to improve prospective physics teachers’ conceptual understanding of moon phases through an integrated observational and virtual simulation learning. Employing a pre-experimental method with a one-group pretest-posttest design, the study involved a total sample of 19 students from the Physics Education Department. The research instrument was a conceptual understanding test adapted from the Moon Phases Concept Inventory (MPCI), consisting of 11 items and accompanied by a Certainty of Response Index (CRI). The results revealed a substantial increase in students’ understanding, as indicated by the mean pretest score of 2.68 (SD = 1.108; SE = 0.254) and the mean posttest score of 9.47 (SD = 1.744; SE = 0.400). The Shapiro-Wilk normality test showed that the pretest data were normally distributed (Sig. = 0.130), while the posttest data were not (Sig. = 0.001). Consequently, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used and confirmed a statistically significant difference between the pretest and posttest scores (Asymp. Sig. 2-tailed = 0.000). These findings indicate that combining direct observation and virtual simulation contributes meaningfully to the improvement of prospective physics students’ conceptual understanding of Moon phases. These findings also illustrate the value of integrating real-world experiences and simulation technology into the physics teacher education curriculum to strengthen conceptual competencies, spatial skills, and pedagogical readiness while supporting deep learning.

References

Afifah, S., Mudzakir, A., & Nandiyanto, A. B. D. (2022). How to calculate paired sample t-test using SPSS software: From step-by-step processing for users to the practical examples in the analysis of the effect of application anti-fire bamboo teaching materials on student learning outcomes. Indonesian Journal of Teaching in Science, 2(1), 81–92.

Aydeniz, M., & Brown, C. L. (2010). Enhancing pre-service elementary school teachers’ understanding of essential science concepts through a reflective conceptual change model. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 2(2), 305–326.

Barnett, M., & Morran, J. (2002). Addressing children’s alternative frameworks of the moon’s phases and eclipses. International Journal of Science Education, 24(8), 859–879.

Bayraktar, Ş. (2009). Pre-service primary teachers’ ideas about Lunar Phases.

Bell, R. L., & Trundle, K. C. (2008). The use of a computer simulation to promote scientific conceptions of moon phases. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 45(3), 346–372.

Chastenay, P., & Riopel, M. (2020). Development and validation of the moon phases concept inventory for middle school. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(2), 20107.

Cole, M., Wilhelm, J., & Yang, H. (2015). Student moon observations and spatial-scientific reasoning. International Journal of Science Education, 37(11), 1815–1833.

Cole, M., Yang, H., & Wilhelm, J. A. (2022). A Project-Based Instruction Approach to Improving Student Lunar Phases Learning Outcomes: A Quantitative Inquiry. Education Sciences, 12(11), 824.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

De Neys, W., & Pennycook, G. (2019). Logic, fast and slow: Advances in dual-process theorizing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(5), 503–509.

DiSessa, A. A. (2018). A friendly introduction to “knowledge in pieces”: Modeling types of knowledge and their roles in learning. Invited Lectures from the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education, 65–84.

Duit, R., Treagust, D. F., & Widodo, A. (2013). Teaching science for conceptual change: Theory and practice. In International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 487–503). Routledge.

Elzulfiah, R., Mahanti, D. E., Ramadhan, F., & Nasbey, H. (2015). Kajian perkembangan pendidikan astronomi untuk SMA di Indonesia. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika (E-JOURNAL), 4, SNF2015-IV.

Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 59(1), 255–278.

Gozzard, D. R., & Zadnik, M. G. (2021). Contribution of self-directed, naked-eye observations to students’ conceptual understanding and attitudes towards astronomy. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(1), 10134.

Harlow, D. B., & Bianchini, J. A. (2025). Knowledge-in-Pieces—Andrea A. diSessa, David Hammer. In Science education in theory and practice: An introductory guide to learning theory (pp. 389–403). Springer.

Hartanto, T. J., Dinata, P. A. C., Hakim, L., & Suhartono, S. (2025). Can Concreteness Fading and Multi-Representational Learning Enhance Students’ Understanding of Geometrical Optics? Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 26(2), 1086–1106.

Hartanto, T. J., & Nawir, M. (2017). Studi tentang miskonsepsi siswa dan mahasiswa terhadap konsep rangkaian listrik arus searah (direct current). Vidya Karya, 32(2), 97–109.

Herder, T., & Rau, M. A. (2022). Representational-competency supports in the context of an educational video game for undergraduate astronomy. Computers & Education, 190, 104602.

Johnston, J. S. (2009). What does the skill of observation look like in young children? International Journal of Science Education, 31(18), 2511–2525.

Julianti, V., Permana, A. H., & Fahdiran, R. (2022). Pengembangan E-Modul Astrofisika Sebagai Modul Pendamping Persiapan KSN Astronomi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika (E-Journal), 10.

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. macmillan.

Karamustafaoğlu, S., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2015). Understanding electrochemistry concepts using the predict-observe-explain strategy. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 923–936.

Karwasz, G. P., & Wyborska, K. (2023). How constructivist environment changes perception of learning: Physics is fun. Education Sciences, 13(2), 195.

Kavanagh, C., Agan, L., & Sneider, C. (2005). Learning about phases of the moon and eclipses: A guide for teachers and curriculum developers. Astronomy Education Review, 4(1), 19–52.

Kibirige, I., Osodo, J., & Tlala, K. M. (2014). The effect of predict-observe-explain strategy on learners’ misconceptions about dissolved salts. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(4).

Kilic, S. (2016). Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient. Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 6(1), 47.

Korur, F. (2015). Exploring seventh-grade students’ and pre-service science teachers’ misconceptions in astronomical concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 1041–1060.

Lin, J. (2016). Using a learning cycle to deepen chinese primary students’ concept learning of “phases of the moon.” EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(11), 2861–2874.

Marcelina, S., & Hartanto, T. J. (2021). Correcting students’ understanding about simple direct current (DC) circuits through scientific approach. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 7(2), 153–160.

Marwala, T. (2024). Thinking Fast and Slow. In The Balancing Problem in the Governance of Artificial Intelligence (pp. 35–49). Springer.

Mayer, R. E. (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 226–232.

Mohd Radzi, R., Abdullah, M. N. S., & Muruthi, K. (2017). Inquiry-discovery teaching approach as a means to remediate primary students’ misconceptions about the Phases of the moon. Overcoming Students’ Misconceptions in Science: Strategies and Perspectives from Malaysia, 71–87.

Nikolopoulou, A., Fili, S., Founta, M., & Starakis, I. (2024). Kindergarten students’ and pre-service teachers’ perceptions regarding the frequency of the Moon’s appearance at night. International Journal of Early Years Education, 32(1), 137–157.

Pang, S., Lv, G., Zhang, Y., & Yang, Y. (2024). Enhancing students’ science learning using virtual simulation technologies: a systematic review. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 1–21.

Park, S.-K. (2013). The relationship between students’ perception of the scientific models and their alternative conceptions of the lunar phases. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 9(3), 285–299.

Plummer, J. D. (2012). Challenges in defining and validating an astronomy learning progression. In Learning progressions in science: Current challenges and future directions (pp. 77–100). SensePublishers Rotterdam.

Plummer, J. D. (2014). Spatial thinking as the dimension of progress in an astronomy learning progression. Studies in Science Education, 50(1), 1–45.

Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227.

Prima, E., Putri, A. R., & Rustaman, N. (2018). Learning Solar System Using PhET Simulation to Improve Students’ Understanding and Motivation. Journal of Science Learning, 1(2), 60–70.

Prodjosantoso, A. K., & Hertina, A. M. (2019). The Misconception Diagnosis on Ionic and Covalent Bonds Concepts with Three Tier Diagnostic Test. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 1477–1488.

Pujani, N. M. (2013). Pengembangan keterampilan laboratorium astronomi berbasis kemampuan generik sains bagi calon guru fisika. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 18(2), 230–239.

Pundak, D., Liberman, I., & Shacham, M. (2017). From Conceptual Frameworks to Mental Models for Astronomy: Students’ Perceptions. Journal of Astronomy & Earth Sciences Education, 4(2), 109–126.

Rutten, N., Van Joolingen, W. R., & Van Der Veen, J. T. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers & Education, 58(1), 136–153.

Sugiyono. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Syuhendri, S., Siahaan, S. M., & Pasaribu, A. (2022). Lunar Phases Refutation Texts: Suplement Texts to Overcome Students’ Misconceptions. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 3(6), 157–160.

Taşlıdere, E. (2013). Effect of conceptual change oriented instruction on students’ conceptual understanding and decreasing their misconceptions in DC electric circuits. Creative Education, 4(4), 273–282.

Tombul, S., Taş, E., & Yeşiltaş, H. M. (2024). The Effect of Modeling and Computer Aided Teachıng On Astronomy on Some Learning Products of 7th Class Learners. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 13(2), 245–260.

Trumper, R. (2006). Teaching future teachers basic astronomy concepts—seasonal changes—at a time of reform in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 43(9), 879–906.

Türkmen, H. (2015). After Almost Half-Century Landing on the Moon and Still Countering Basic Astronomy Conceptions. European Journal of Physics Education, 6(2), 1–17.

Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24(4), 535–585.

Wilhelm, J., Cole, M., Cohen, C., & Lindell, R. (2018). How middle level science teachers visualize and translate motion, scale, and geometric space of the Earth-Moon-Sun system with their students. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(1), 10150.

Wilhelm, J., Jackson, C., Sullivan, A., & Wilhelm, R. (2013). Examining differences between preteen groups’ spatial-scientific understandings: A quasi-experimental study. The Journal of Educational Research, 106(5), 337–351.

Zou, Y., Jin, L., Huang, X., & Li, Y. (2023). Assessment of Conceptual Understanding in Student Learning of Moon Phases. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 22(4), 719–736.