Kualitas Pembelajaran IPA di SMP Negeri 1 Taopa Kabupaten Parigi Moutong
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/bioscientist.v13i2.16504Keywords:
kualitas Pembelajaran IPAAbstract
This study aims to analyze the quality of science learning at SMP Negeri 1 Taopa. This research used descriptive method with qualitative approach. The subjects of this study consisted of 52 students and 2 science teachers at SMP Negeri 1 Taopa. The types and sources of data used are primary, namely the results of observations, questionnaires and interviews. Based on the results of the study, the quality of learning shows excellent achievements in various aspects. Learning media is in the Very Good category with a percentage of 86.53%, indicating high effectiveness in delivering material. Similarly, the learning method also reached the Very Good category with a percentage of 82.5%, confirming that the combination of media and methods applied was very effective. Furthermore, the learning system also obtained a Very Good category with a percentage of 87.5%, indicating that the flow and structure of learning has been optimally designed. Overall, the findings show that the evaluated learning components contribute significantly to a quality learning experience. Thus, it can be concluded that the quality of learning at SMP Negeri 1 Taopa is in the Very Good category.
References
Abidin, A. R., & Abidin, M. (2021). Urgensi Komunikasi Model Stimulus Organism Response ( S-O-R ) Dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran. 6(2), 74–90.
Amaliyah, M., Suardana, I. N., & Selamet, K. (2021). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Dan Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Kesulitan Belajar Ipa Siswa SMP Negeri 4 Singaraja. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Sain s Indonesia (JPPSI), 4(1), 90–101.
Anggito, A., & Setiawan, J. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. CV Jejak.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Cholifah, T. N., Studi, P., Dasar, P., Islam, U., Rahmat, R., Pembelajaran, K., & Pembelajaran, P. K. (2018). Indonesian Journal of Natural Science Education (IJNSE). 01, 65–74.
Dinatha, N, M & laksana, D. N. L. 2017. Kesulitan Belajar Siswa dalam Mata Pelajaran IPA Terpadu. Jurnal Pendidikan Nusantara (JPDN). 2 (2), pp. 214-223
Fauziah, S. D. (2018).Upaya Guru Dalam Peningkatan Kualitas Jurusan : Pendidikan Agama Islam Fakultas : Tarbiyah dan Ilmu Keguruan Institut Agama Islam Negeri Metro Institut Agama Islam Negeri Metro Institut Agama Islam ( IAIN ) METRO TA . 1440 H / 2018 M.
Fraser, B. J. (2012). Classroom learning environments: Retrospect, context and prospect. In Second International Handbook of Science Education (pp. 1191–1239). Springer.
Freeman, S., et al. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Routledge.
Isnaini, N., & Hidayah, D. (2020). Media Pembelajaran Dalam Pembentukan Interaksi Belajar Siswa. Universitas Sultan Agung Tirtayasa.
Khairani, Makmun. 2017. Psikolog Belajar. Yogyakarta
Marzano, R. J. (2003). Classroom Management That Works: Research-Based Strategies for Every Teacher. ASCD.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia Learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Prasetyaningsih, P., & Wilujeng, I. (2016). Analisis Kualitas Pengelolaan Kelas Pembelajaran Sains Pada Smp Ssn Di Kabupaten Pati. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran IPA, 2(2), 147.
Prince, M. (2004). Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231.
Riduwan. 2014. Dasar-dasar Stastika , Bandung:Alfabeta.
Rutten, N., van Joolingen, W. R., & van der Veen, J. T. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers & Education, 58(1), 136–153.
Samsinar, S., Ushuluddin, F., & Bone, I. (n.d.). Urgensi Learning Resources (Sumber Belajar). 194–205.
Sappaile, B. I., Hikmah, N., Simanugkalit, L. N., Trinova, Z., & Al Haddar, G. (2023). Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran IPA Melalui Metode Eksperimen Berbasis Lingkungan Pada Peserta Didik Kelas V SDN. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(3), 9981–9989.
Sarifudin, Madrasah, D. I., Negeri, I., & Kota, M. I. N. (2019). Islamic Management: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, Vol. 02, No. 01, Januari 2019. 02(01).
Sarini, P., Selamet, K., & No, V. (2019). Wahana Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Etnosains Bali bagi Calon Guru IPA Wahana Matematika dan Sains : Jurnal Matematika , Sains , dan. Wahana Matematika Dan Sains : Jurnal Matematika,Sains, Dan Pembelajarannya, 13(1), 27–39.
Slavin, R. E. (2006). Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice (8th ed.). Pearson.
Sudarsih, S. (2020). Peningkatan Kualitas Pembelajaran IPA Materi Sifat-Sifat Cahaya Melalui Penerapan Metode Kontekstual Pada Siswa Kelas V SD Negeri 4 Madurejo. Bitnet: Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi, 5(1), 44–48.
Sugiyono. 2005. Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung:CV. Alfabeta.
Susanti, N., Murzanita, M., & Lestari, N. (2021). Analisis proses Pembelajaran IPA Pada Materi Cahaya melalui Lesson Study Berbasis TBLA (Transcript Based Lesson Analysis) Di Kelas VIII.2 SMP ISLAM Al-Falah Kota Jambi. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 10(2), 54.
Wahyuni, R. A. (2020). Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar IPA dengan Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Predict, Discuss,Explain,Observe, Discuss, Explain (PDEODE). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan, FKIP UNMA 2020, 2, 477–486.
Widodo, D. (2021). Peningkatan Kualitas Pembelajaran IPA Melalui Model Kooperatif Tipe Group Investigation Dengan Media CD Pembelajaran Pada Siswa Kelas V SDN Tulung 01 Educatif Journal of Education Research, 4(7), 265–272.
Yager, R. E., & Falk, J. H. (2008). The importance of relevance in science education. The Science Teacher, 75(6), 34–37.
Zurika, H., Ismaya, N. (2020). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Akuntansi Untuk Meningkatkan Liabilities. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi, 3(3).
