Validity and Reliability of Learning Tools Based on Discovery Learning Model to Improve Creative Thinking Ability and Concept Understanding

Authors

  • Linda Lusiana Muslim (Scopus ID: 57193126887); Department of Physics Education, Mataram University
  • Ni Nyoman Sri Putu Verawati Universitas Mataram
  • Muh Makhrus Universitas Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/j-lkf.v9i1.3507

Keywords:

Validity and Reliability of Learning tools, Discovery Learning, Creative Thinking Ability, Conceptual Understanding

Abstract

This study aimed to describe the validity and reliability of the based discovery learning models to improve creative thinking ability and students’ conceptual understanding of harmonic vibrations. The type of research used is research development (Research and Development) with the research design being developed is 4D Models. The subject of this research is the based discovery learning models to improve creative thinking ability and students’ conceptual understanding of harmonic vibrations. Retrieval of research data using validation sheets which were assessed by 3 expert validators consisting of 3 physics education lecturers. The research data is in the form of qualitative and quantitative data from the validator's assessment of the learning tools developed. The learning tools include syllabus, learning material, lesson plans, student worksheet, creative thinking ability test, and conceptual understanding test. This study conducted a validity test to determine the feasibility and validity level of the learning tools. The validity data obtained a value of 3.39 for the syllabus, 3.41 for the learning material, 3.27 for the lesson plan, 3.41 for the student worksheet, 3.37 for the creative thinking ability test and 3.33 for the conceptual understanding test. So that the average validity of learning tools is in the very valid category with a validity level of 3.36. Furthermore, the reliability test, the coefficient interval results obtained are 0.973 for the syllabus, 0.939 for the learning material, 0.976 for lesson plans, 0.982 for student worksheet, 0.958 for creative thinking ability test and 0.963 for conceptual understanding test. So that the average reliability coefficient interval is 0.965 with the reliable category. The conclusion is that the learning tools are valid and reliable for use in learning activities.

Author Biography

Linda Lusiana Muslim, (Scopus ID: 57193126887); Department of Physics Education, Mataram University

Scopus ID: 57193126887

References

Akmal, N. (2018). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Model Discovery Learning untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Penalaran Siswa SMP/MTs. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(3), 17-28.

Anggraini, D.D., Dafik, D., & Slamin, S. (2019). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Discovery Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Mahasiswa Dalam Materi Local Super Antimagic Total Face Coloring. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 3(1), 68-75.

Arikunto, S. (2014). Prosedur Penelitian, Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Ariyanto, L., Aditya, D., & Dwijayanti, I. (2019). Pengembangan Android Apps Berbasis Discovery Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Siswa Kelas VII. Edumatika Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 40-51.

Benedikta, A. (2013). Pengembangan LKPD Mata Pelajaran Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi Berdasarkan Standar Isi untuk SMA Kelas X. Jurnal PTK, 18(1), 9-14.

Damanik, W.J., & Syahputra, E. (2018). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa Menggunakan Model Discovery Learning. Jurnal Inspiratif, 4(1), 27-38.

Helmi, F., Rokhmat, J., & 'Ardhuha, J. (2017). Pengaruh Pendekatan Berpikir Kausalitik Ber-Scaffolding Tipe 2b Termodifikasi Berbantuan LKS Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Fluida Dinamis Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 3(1), 68-75.

Latifa, B.R.A., Verawati, N.N.S.P., & Harjono, A. (2017). Pengaruh Model Learning Cycle 5E Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik Kelas X MAN 1 Mataram. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 3(1), 61-67.

Makhrus, M., & Hadiprayitno, G. (2012). Penerapan Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika Berorientasi Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu Tipe Connected. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 19(2), 237-242.

Munandar, A., Ngazizah, N., & Fatmaryanti, S.D. (2016). Pengembangan Lembar Kegiatan Peserta Didik (LKPD) Berbasis Discovery Learning untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Memprediksi, Mengukur, dan Mengkomunikasikan pada Peserta Didik Kelas X SMAN 11 Purworejo. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 6(1), 91-94.

Purohita, A.M., Suardana, N., & Selamet, K. (2020). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Discovery Learning Pada Pokok Bahasan Getaran dan Gelombang. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Sains Indonesia, 3(1), 12-20.

Rahmadani, E., Fauzi, M.A., & Karnasih, I. (2017). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Berbasis Model Discovery Learning untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep dan Disposisi Siswa Berbantuan Geoboard. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 10(2), 106-117.

Ratumanan, G.T., & Laurens, T. (2011). Penilaian Hasil Belajar pada Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Surabaya: Unesa University Press.

Sahidu, H. (2017). Pengembangan Program Pembelajaran Fisika (P3F). Mataram: FKIP Press.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suparman, S., & Husen, D.N. (2015). Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif dan Pemahaman Konsep Siswa Melalui Penerapan Model Problem Based Learning. Jurnal Bioedukasi, 3(2), 367-372.

Thiagarajan, S. (1974). Instructional Development for Teacher of Exceptional Children. Bloomington: Indiana University.

Widoyoko, E.P. (2014). Penilaian Hasil Pembelajaran di Sekolah. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-30

How to Cite

Muslim, L. L., Verawati, N. N. S. P., & Makhrus, M. (2021). Validity and Reliability of Learning Tools Based on Discovery Learning Model to Improve Creative Thinking Ability and Concept Understanding. Lensa: Jurnal Kependidikan Fisika, 9(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-lkf.v9i1.3507

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 1: June 2021

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with Lensa: Jurnal Kependidikan Fisika agree to the following terms:

  1. For all articles published in Lensa: Jurnal Kependidikan Fisika, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
  2. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.