Effects of Problem-Based Learning on Elementary Students’ Scientific Literacy: A Quasi-Experimental Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v14i1.18074Keywords:
Scientific Literacy, Problem-Based Learning, Science Learning, Elementary School StudentsAbstract
This study investigated the effect of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) on elementary school students’ scientific literacy in ecosystem learning. A quasi-experimental pretest–posttest non-equivalent control group design was employed involving 32 fifth-grade students from two primary schools in Ambon City, Indonesia. The experimental group consisted of 20 students from SD Negeri 76 Ambon, while the control group consisted of 12 students from SD Inpres 45 Ambon. The intervention was implemented over four weeks (eight lessons, 70 minutes each). The experimental group was taught using a structured seven-stage PBL model, whereas the control group received conventional teacher-centered instruction. Scientific literacy was assessed using an eight-item essay test aligned with PISA-oriented indicators, namely explaining scientific phenomena, designing and evaluating scientific investigations, and interpreting data and evidence. The instrument demonstrated acceptable validity (r = 0.70) and reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.84). Data analysis using an independent samples t-test revealed a statistically significant difference between groups (t = −2.692, p = 0.012). Students in the PBL group achieved substantially higher posttest scores (M = 70.00, SD = 8.41) than those in the conventional group (M = 54.00, SD = 7.96), indicating a meaningful instructional effect. Further analysis showed that PBL particularly strengthened students’ abilities to interpret data and construct evidence-based explanations. These findings suggest that PBL is an effective instructional approach for enhancing scientific literacy in elementary ecosystem learning contexts, although conclusions should be limited to similar classroom settings and sample characteristics.
References
Ahmed, S. K. (2024). How to choose a sampling technique and determine sample size for research: A simplified guide for researchers. Oral Oncology Reports, 12, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oor.2024.100662
Akcay, B., & Benek, İ. (2024). Problem-based learning in Türkiye: a systematic literature review of research in science education. Education Sciences, 14(3), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030330
Al Sultan, A., Henson, H., & Lickteig, D. (2021). Assessing preservice elementary teachers’ conceptual understanding of scientific literacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 102, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103327
Ali, L. U., Suranto, Indrowati, M., & Suhirman. (2025). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of problem-based learning on science literacy. Towards Resilient Societies: The Synergy of Religion, Education, Health, Science, and Technology, 273–278. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003645542-44
Asilevi, M. N., Kärkkäinen, S., Kang, J., Sormunen, K., & Havu-nuutinen, S. (2025). Primary school students ’ experiences of science learning content and support provided during guided inquiry-based science fieldwork. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 13(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.13.1.2612
Auerbach, A. J., & Schussler, E. E. (2017). Curriculum alignment with vision and change improves student scientific literacy. CBE Life Sciences Education, 16(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-04-0160
Ayotte-Beaudet, J. P., Chastenay, P., Beaudry, M. C., L’Heureux, K., Giamellaro, M., Smith, J., Desjarlais, E., & Paquette, A. (2023). Exploring the impacts of contextualised outdoor science education on learning: the case of primary school students learning about ecosystem relationships. Journal of Biological Education, 57(2), 277–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2021.1909634
Batlolona, J. R., Diantoro, M., Wartono, & Leasa, M. (2020). Students’ mental models of solid elasticity: Mixed method study. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(2), 200–210. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.21
Batlolona, J. R., & Souisa, H. F. (2020). Problem based learning: Students’ mental models on water conductivity concept. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(2), 269–277. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i2.20468
Belland, B. R., Gu, J., Kim, N. J., Jaden Turner, D., & Mark Weiss, D. (2019). Exploring epistemological approaches and beliefs of middle school students in problem-based learning. Journal of Educational Research, 112(6), 643–655. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2019.1650701
Bellová, R., Melicherčíková, D., Tomčík, P., Bellová, R., Melicherčíková, D., & Tomčík, P. (2017). Possible reasons for low scientific literacy of Slovak students in some natural science subjects in some natural science subjects. Research in Science & Technological Education, 36(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1367656
Bencze, L., & Carter, L. (2011). Globalizing students acting for the common good. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 648–669. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20419
Bokonjic, D., Mimica, M., Pranjic, N., Filipovic, V., Cosovic, S., Bosse, H.-M., et al. (2009). Problem-based learning. http://www.bhmed-emanual.org
Broderick, N. (2025). Exploring different visions of scientific literacy in Irish primary science education: core issues and future directions. Irish Educational Studies, 44(1), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2023.2230191
Burrow, A. K. (2018). Teaching introductory ecology with problem-based learning. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 99(1), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/bes2.1364
Bybee, R. W., & Fuchs, B. (2006). Preparing the 21st century workforce: a new reform in science and technology education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 349–352. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea
Capili, B., & Anastasi, J. K. (2025). An introduction to the quasi-experimental design (nonrandomized design). AJN The American Journal of Nursing, 124(11), 50–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0001081740.74815.20.An
Chang, C. Y., Chang, Y. H., & Yang, F. Y. (2009). Exploring secondary science teachers’ perceptions on the goals of earth science education in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 31(17), 2315–2334. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802314868
Cong, L., & Ironsi, C. S. (2025). Integrating mobile learning and problem-based learning in improving students action competence in problem-solving and critical thinking skills. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05397-4
Conica, M., Nixon, E., & Quigley, J. (2023). Domain-specific and cross-domain effects of the home literacy and numeracy environment at 3 years on children ’ s academic competencies at 5 and 9 years. Developmental Psychology, 59(6), 1045–1058. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001515
Cromley, J. G. (2009). Reading achievement and science proficiency: International comparisons from the programme on international student assessment. In Reading Psychology (Vol. 30, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710802274903
Díez-Palomar, J., Font Palomar, M., Aubert, A., & Garcia-Yeste, C. (2022). Dialogic scientific gatherings: the promotion of scientific literacy among children. SAGE Open, 12(4), 690–696. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221121783
Ding, C. (2022). Examining the context of better science literacy outcomes among U.S. schools using visual analytics : A machine learning approach. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 3, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100191
Elomaa, M., Eskelä-Haapanen, S., Pakarinen, E., Halttunen, L., & Lerkkanen, M. K. (2024). Elementary school principals’ work from the ecological systems perspective: Evidence from Finland. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 52(5), 1231–1251. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221125999
Fortus, D., Lin, J., Neumann, K., & Sadler, T. D. (2022). The role of affect in science literacy for all. International Journal of Science Education, 44(4), 535–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2036384
Funa, A. A., & Prudente, M. S. (2021). Effectiveness of problem-based learning on secondary students’ achievement in science: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.1445a
Gal, A., Gan, D., & Ben Zvi – Assaraf, O. (2020). Can elementary school students understand the complexity of the lesser kestrel’s ecological system? Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 17(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/9152
Gao, H., He, W., Zhang, C., & Ren, L. (2016). Building scientific literacy in China: achievements and prospects. Science Bulletin, 61(11), 871–874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-016-1076-0
Haruehansawasin, S., & Kiattikomol, P. (2017). Scaffolding in problem-based learning for low- achieving learners. The Journal of Educational Research, 0(0), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2017.1287045
Hokayem, H., & Gotwals, A. W. (2016). Early elementary students ’ understanding of complex ecosystems : a learning progression approach. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(10), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21336
Hurd, P. D. (1958). Science literacy : its meaning for American Schools. Educational Leadership, 16(1), 13–16.
Hussa, E. A. (2018). Can I still eat it? Using problem-based learning to test the 5-second rule and promote scientific literacy. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 365(21), 4–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fny246
Johansen, G., & Afdal, H. W. (2018). Comparing and discussing positions on scientific literacy in teacher education and lower secondary school curricula. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 17(2), 99–126. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.17.2.7
Karnia, R. (2024). Importance of reliability and validity in research. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 13(6), 137–141. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20241306.11
Kasuga, W., Maro, W., & Pangani, I. (2022). Effect of problem-based learning on developing science process skills and learning achievement on the topic of safety in our environment. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(3), 872–886. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.154
Kolstø, S. D. (2006). Patterns in students’ argumentation confronted with a risk-focused socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 28(14), 1689–1716. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600560878
Leasa, M., Abednego, A., & Batlolona, J. R. (2023). Problem-based learning (PBL) with reading questioning and answering (RQA) of preservice elementary school teachers. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(6), 245–261. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.6.14
Leasa, M., Pelamonia, J., Talakua, M., & Rafafy, J. (2024). Emotional literacy of elementary school teachers : a study on science learning with problem-based learning (PBL) and Homogeinity Psycho Cognition (HPC) program. KnE Social Sciences, 2024, 432–444. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i31.17605
Lee-Hammond, L., & McConney, A. (2016). The impact of village-based kindergarten on early literacy , numeracy , and school attendance in Solomon Islands. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 25(4), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2016.1155256
Mambrey, S., Schreiber, N., & Schmiemann, P. (2022). Young students’ reasoning about ecosystems: the role of systems thinking, knowledge, conceptions, and representation. Research in Science Education, 52(1), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09917-x
Martín-Gámez, C., Acebal, M. del C., & Prieto, T. (2020). Developing the concept of ‘ecosystem’ through inquiry-based learning: a study of pre-service primary teachers. Journal of Biological Education, 54(2), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2018.1554596
Merta, I. W., Artayasa, I. P., Kusmiyati, K., Lestari, N., & Setiadi, D. (2020). The frofile of science literacy and instruction model can increase science literacy capabilty. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 15(3), 223–228. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v15i3.1889
Naresti, D. A., Suratmi, & Hartono. (2024). Improving elementary school students ’ science literacy skills through digital picture storybooks. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 8(4), 634–643. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v8i4.86894
Nguyen, L. T. Van, Cleveland, D., Nguyen, C. T. M., & Joyce, C. (2024). Problem-based learning and the integration of sustainable development goals. Journal of Work-Applied Management, 16(2), 218–234. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-12-2023-0142
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. In OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2023). Education at a Glance 2023 OECD INDICATORS. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/education-at-a-glance-2023_e13bef63-en.html
Oluwatayo, J. A. (2012). Validity and reliability issues in educational research. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 2(2), 391–400. https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2012.v2n2.391
Orhan, A. (2025). Investigating the effectiveness of problem based learning on academic achievement in efl classroom: a meta-analysis. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 34(2), 699–709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-024-00889-4
Pamularsih, N. (2022). The effects of school climate on students ’ reading achievement. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 6(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100375
Prihatiningtyas, S., Shofiyah, N., Yunus, S. R., Ma’arif, I. B., & Putra, I. A. (2025). Enhancing science literacy through flipbook-based STEM Qur’an e-modules: a case study in Islamic boarding schools. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05054-w
Puspita, A. D., Maryani, I., & Sukma, H. H. (2023). Problem-based science learning in elementary schools: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Education and Learning, 17(2), 285–293. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v17i2.20856
Ramachandran, R., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2020). Student perspectives on remote learning in a large organic chemistry lecture course. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2565–2572. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00572
Rathleff, C. R., Vergel, J., Ryberg, T., & Kristensen, J. K. (2025). Medical students ’ evaluation of digital problem-based learning : a mixed-methods systematic review. BMC Medical Education, 25, 1–15.
Roy, G., Sikder, S., & Danaia, L. (2025). Adopting scientific literacy in early years from empirical studies on formal education : a systematic review of the literature. International Journal of STEM Education, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-025-00547-1
Rusilowati, A., & Susilaningsih, E. (2024). Development of multiple-choice test instruments to improve scientific literacy in Madrasah Aliyah ( MA ). International Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM), 12(06), 3465–3475. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v12i06.el04
Savolainen, P., Korhonen, E., Närhi, V., Kärkkäinen, S., & Savolainen, H. (2025). Factors affecting the behavioral climate in elementary school classrooms. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 3831, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2025.2554728
Shahzadi, I., & Nasreen, A. (2020). Assessing scientific literacy levels among secondary school science students of District Lahore. Bulletin of Education and Research, 42(3), 1–21.
Smith, K. V., Loughran, J., Berry, A., & Dimitrakopoulos, C. (2012). Developing scientific literacy in a primary school. International Journal of Science Education, 34(1), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.565088
Stekelenburg, A. van. (2026). Science literacy and the acceptance of scientific facts. Current Opinion in Psychology, 67, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102183
Suárez-Mesa, A. M., & Gómez, R. L. (2024). Does teachers’ motivation have an impact on students’ scientific literacy and motivation? An empirical study in Colombia with data from PISA 2015. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 12(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-023-00190-8
Synak, N., Šabíková, N., & Masaryk, R. (2024). Correlations among high school students’ beliefs about conspiracy, authoritarianism, and scientific literacy. Science and Education, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00380-w
Tseng, Y. H., Chang, C. Y., Rundgren, S. N. C., & Rundgren, C. J. (2010). Mining concept maps from news stories for measuring civic scientific literacy in media. Computers and Education, 55(1), 165–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.01.002
Udompong, L., & Wongwanich, U. (2014). Diagnosis of the scientific literacy characteristics of primary students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 5091–5096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1079
Uluçinar, U. (2023). The effect of problem-based learning in science education on academic achievement: a meta-analytical study. Science Education International, 34(2), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v34.i2.1
Vieira, R. M., & Tenreiro-Vieira, C. (2016). Fostering scientific literacy and critical thinking in elementary science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(4), 659–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9605-2
Yuliana, I., Jatmiko, B., Widodo, W., Suryanti, & Irwanto. (2025). Primary education students’ scientific literacy in terms of some variables. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 9(1), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v9i1.4384
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Juliana Dadiara, Marleny Leasa, John Rafafy Batlolona

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

