Discovering the Relationship Between Science Students' Critical Thinking and Collaborative Problem Solving in Higher Education: Theoretical, Empirical, and Determining Factors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v14i1.16655Keywords:
Critical Thinking, Collaborative Problem Solving, Science Learning, Higher Education.Abstract
This study investigates the robust positive correlation between critical thinking (CT) and collaborative problem-solving (CPS) in science education. Employing a convergent parallel mixed methods design, the study involved a sample of 231 undergraduate students from Islamic higher education. Linear regression analysis demonstrated that CT accounted for 74.20% of the variance in CPS. The study underwent three complementary analytical phases. In the theoretical phase, prior literature was reviewed to contextualize CT and CPS. In the empirical phase, quantitative data were analyzed using regression, confirming the strong association between CT and CPS in the context of science education. In the factor-identification phase, qualitative coding revealed enabling and constraining factors. Enablers included AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT), conducive environments, hands-on practice, and targeted training, while barriers included personal biases, time constraints, and team conflicts. This research contributes by employing a convergent mixed-methods design in the Islamic higher education science context, integrating regression with qualitative factor analysis. These findings provide actionable guidance for designing integrated pedagogical strategies that promote both CT and CPS.
References
Almulla, M. A. (2023). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for students’ critical thinking, creativity, and problem solving to affect academic performance in higher education. Cogent Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2172929
Apdoludin, A., & Martinisyamin, M. (2022). Modeling Analysis, Findings, Development, Organizing the Material and Learning for Students in Islamic Boarding Schools. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 8(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v8i1.15277
Bandura, A. (1999). Handbook Personality. In L. Pervin & O. John (Ed.), A social cognitive theory of personality (2nd Ed, pp. 154–196). Guilford Publications.
Bos, C., Vader, S., van Vooren, N., Jerković-Ćosić, K., & Keij, B. (2025). How to improve support for people with (complex) multiple-problems through social prescribing in a vulnerable neighborhood; professionals’, experts-by-experience’ and clients’ perspectives. BMC Primary Care, 26(1), 165. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02867-1
Campos, D. G., & Scherer, R. (2024). Digital gender gaps in Students’ knowledge, attitudes and skills: an integrative data analysis across 32 Countries. Education and Information Technologies, 29(1), 655–693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12272-9
Carmona, A. G. (2023). Scientific Thinking and Critical Thinking in Science Education : Two Distinct but Symbiotically Related Intellectual Processes. Science and Education, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-023-00460-5
Cheruiyot, L. G., & Molnár, G. (2025). Technology-based assessment of collaborative problem-solving skills: a bibliometric analysis and review. Journal of Computers in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-025-00361-2
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Pearson.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano, C. V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Sage Publications.
De Klerk, C., Ker-Fox, J., & Steenekamp, L. (2025). Enhancing critical thinking through collaborative learning: the impact of a partial pre-release assessment format. Accounting Education, 34(4), 499–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2024.2361647
Fathonah, S., Cahyono, E., Iswari, R., Haryani, S., Sarwi, S., Lestari, N., & Kadarwati, S. (2024). Effects of multirepresentation-based creative problem-solving learning model on students’ critical thinking and diet nutritional quality. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 20(4), 669–694. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2023.038
Fleckney, P., Thompson, J., & Vaz-Serra, P. (2025). Designing effective peer assessment processes in higher education: a systematic review. Higher Education Research & Development, 44(2), 386–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2024.2407083
Haroky, F., Nikmah, S., Wilujeng, I., Jumadi, & Kuswanto, H. (2019). Android-Assisted Physics Comic Learning to Train Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Newton’s Gravity. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233(1), 012045. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012045
Hobenu, K. A., Adefuye, A. O., Naab, F., & Nyoni, C. N. (2025). Strategies to enhance clinical teaching and learning in undergraduate nursing education: A scoping review. PLOS One, 20(6), e0305789. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0305789
Hu, Y., & Shu, J. (2025). The Effect of Drama Education on Enhancing Critical Thinking Through Collaboration and Communication. Education Sciences, 15(5), 565. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15050565
Karunarathne, W., & Calma, A. (2024). Assessing creative thinking skills in higher education: deficits and improvements. Studies in Higher Education, 49(1), 157–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2225532
Khusna, A. H., Siswono, T. Y. E., & Wijayanti, P. (2024). Research trends in critical thinking skills in mathematics: a bibliometric study. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 13(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i1.26013
Manousou, E. (2025). Critical Thinking in Distance Education: The Challenges in a Decade (2016–2025) and the Role of Artificial Intelligence. Education Sciences, 15(6), 757. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15060757
Medina, J. A., Estriegana, R., Barchino, R., Robina-Ramírez, R., Otón-Tortosa, S., & Moreira Teixeira, A. (2024). Acquisition and Development of Basic Competences in Collaborative Environments Through Quiz-Based Game Applications. Electronics, 13(22), 4500. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13224500
Memon, T. D., & Kwan, P. (2025). A Collaborative Model for Integrating Teacher and GenAI into Future Education. TechTrends. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-025-01105-w
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., Rohidi, T. R., & Mulyarto. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis. In SAGE Publications.
Motukeeva, A., Azhibaeva, A., Kulbachaev, D., Abdyrakunova, Z., & Toloev, M. (2024). Formation of creative thinking among students in the digital educational environment. E-Learning and Digital Media. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530241307671
Muhfahroyin, M., Rachmadiarti, F., Mahanal, S., Zubaidah, S., & Siagiyanto, B. E. (2024). Improving Critical Thinking Skills of Low Academic Ability Students through TPS and PBL Integration in Biology Learning. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 20(4), 606–618. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2023.034
Nisa, H., Isnaini, M., Utami, L. S., & Islahudin, I. (2023). Collaborative Learning Effect on Improving Students’ Creativity and Critical Thinking in the Independent Curriculum. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i3.3538
Nolan, E., & Zeidler, D. (2025). Cultivating critical reflection through socioscientific perspectives. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 7(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-025-00136-w
Nurdiana, N., Hunaepi, H., Ikhsan, M., Suwono, H., & Sulisetijono, S. (2023). Exploring curiosity and critical thinking skills for prospective biology teacher. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 12(1), 131. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i1.23302
OECD. (2018). Collaborative Problem-Solving. In Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining: Vol. V. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_100128
Ojo, M. (2015). Enhancing the reliability of performance measures in empirical based research: leverage ratios and theoretical based research.
Orhan, A. (2022). Critical thinking dispositions and decision making as predictors of high school students’ perceived problem solving skills. The Journal of Educational Research, 115(4), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2022.2113498
Palavan, Ö., Kirikkaleli, N. O., & Güneyli, A. (2025). Mentor Teachers’ Opinions for Sustainable Teacher Education: The Case of Northern Cyprus. Sustainability, 17(11), 5138. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17115138
Pawlicki, M., Pawlicka, A., Kozik, R., & Choraś, M. (2024). The survey on the dual nature of xAI challenges in intrusion detection and their potential for AI innovation. Artificial Intelligence Review, 57(12), 330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-10972-3
Ramdhani, M. R., Kholik, A., Fauziah, S. P., Roestamy, M., Suherman, I., & Nandiyanto, A. B. D. (2023). A Comprehensive Study on Biochar Production, Bibliometric Analysis, and Collaborative Teaching Practicum for Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in Islamic Schools. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 9(2), 123–144. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v9i2.29972
Ramirez, H. J. M., & Monterola, S. L. C. (2022). Co-creating scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning and its effects on students’ logical thinking in earth science. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(5), 908–921. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1702063
Rodriguez-Salvador, M., & Castillo-Valdez, P. F. (2023). Promoting Collaborative Learning in Students Soon to Graduate through a Teaching–Learning Model. Education Sciences, 13(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13100995
Ruiz-Rojas, L. I., Salvador-Ullauri, L., & Acosta-Vargas, P. (2024). Collaborative Working and Critical Thinking: Adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools in Higher Education. Sustainability, 16(13), 5367. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135367
Şimşek, N. (2025). Integration of ChatGPT in mathematical story-focused 5E lesson planning: Teachers and pre-service teachers’ interactions with ChatGPT. Education and Information Technologies, 30(8), 11391–11462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13258-x
Stahl, G. (2023). Computer Support for Collaborative Learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315045467
Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2022). Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. In The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 406–427). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108888295.025
Tedla, Y. G., & Chen, H.-L. (2024). The impacts of computer-supported collaborative learning on students’ critical thinking: a meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12857-y
van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D., & van Merriënboer, J. (2010). Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 270–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004
Williams, F. M., & Juliano, S. A. (1985). FURTHER DIFFICULTIES IN THE ANALYSIS OF FUNCTIONAL-RESPONSE EXPERIMENTS AND A RESOLUTION. The Canadian Entomologist, 117(5), 631–640. https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent117631-5
Xu, E., Wang, W., & Wang, Q. (2023). The effectiveness of collaborative problem solving in promoting students’ critical thinking: A meta-analysis based on empirical literature. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01508-1
Yang, S., Zhu, S., Qin, W., Mai, Y., Guo, Q., & Li, H. (2025). Assessing the impact of problem-based digital learning on mathematics proficiency and creative problem solving for vocational high students. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13710-6
Ying, Y., & Tiemann, R. (2024). Development of an assessment tool for collaborative problem-solving skills in chemistry. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 6(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-024-00116-6
Zaqiah, Q. Y., Hasanah, A., & Heryati, Y. (2024). The Role of Steam Education in Improving Student Collaboration and Creativity: A Case Study in Madrasah. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 10(1), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v10i1.35207
Zhang, H., Chen, S., & Zheng, S. (2025). Proactive personality, interaction, and teaching strategy alignment: A conceptual-level analysis of interaction in distance learning. Education and Information Technologies, 30(2), 1873–1912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12893-8
Zielińska, A., Lebuda, I., Gop, A., & Karwowski, M. (2024). Teachers as creative agents: How self-beliefs and self-regulation drive teachers’ creative activity. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 77, 102267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2024.102267
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 An Nuril Maulida Fauziah, Wahyu Budi Sabtiawan, Angela Boey

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

