REKONSTRUKSI PEMAHAMAN PENILAIAN PEMBEJALARAN: GUGATAN TERHADAP UJIAN NASIONAL PENDIDIKAN KESETARAAN

Authors

  • Agus Sadid Pamong Belajar SKB Kabupaten Sumbawa, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jp.v2i2.3048

Keywords:

Assessment, non-formal education

Abstract

Assessment in learning has a very important meaning, because from the assessment activities we can determine and know the results of children's learning development (read: learning citizens) during the learning process. Assessment is part of evaluation activities that must exist in both formal and non-formal education. This paper examines some of the tutors' misconceptions about assessment, especially alternative assessment concepts, authentic assessments and written tests (paper-and-pencil tests). Assuming that conventional written tests cannot fulfill the need to obtain accurate and comprehensive information about the competence of learning citizens, tutors are encouraged to implement alternative assessments. However, the alternative assessments were not well understood by the tutors in terms of their roles, objectives, and ways of implementing them. Therefore, in order to provide insight into the concept of comprehensive assessment, this paper explores the issue of alternative assessment and compares it to conventional tests in order to make clear its role and function in education, along with the advantages and disadvantages of each. Some of the tutors' misconceptions about the assessment are described and discussed so that the understanding of the assessment concept can be corrected, so that in the end the tutors are not trapped in understanding the concept of assessment limited to conventional assessment (call it: written test)

References

Astin, Aleander W. 1991. Assessment for Excellent: A Philosophy and Practice of Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. . American Council on Education. Oryx Press.

Brown, H.D. 2001. Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. New York: Addison Westley Longman

Brown, H.D. 2004. Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. New

York: Pearson Education, Inc

Brookhart, Suzan M. Grading.

Ohio: Pearson Education, Inc

Blaz, Deborah. 2001. A Collection of Performance Task and Rubrics. Foreign Languages. New York: Eye on Education

Cox, Carole. 1996. Teaching Language Arts. Singapore: Allyn and Bacon

Coble, C & Azordegan, J. 2004. The Challenges and Opportunities of The no child left Behind Act: Seven Strategies for Educator. Action in Teacher Education. 26 (2), 2-14

Ebel, Robert & Fresbie, David A. 1986. Essentials of Education Measurement. Ennglewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, Inc

Harris, M and McCann, P. 1994. Assessment: Handbooks for the English Classroom. Oxford: Macmillan Heinemann.

Neil, D. Monthy. 1997. Transforming Student Assessment. Phil Delta Kappa, Vol 78. On Line: Http:www.questia.com.Accessed on 14th April 2007

Kaufman, Roger. 1979. Need Assessment: Concept and Application. New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications Englewood Cliffs.

Oliva, Peter F. 1983. Supervision for Today’s School. New York & London: Longman

Downloads

Published

2020-10-21

How to Cite

Sadid, A. (2020). REKONSTRUKSI PEMAHAMAN PENILAIAN PEMBEJALARAN: GUGATAN TERHADAP UJIAN NASIONAL PENDIDIKAN KESETARAAN. Jurnal Paedagogy, 2(2), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.33394/jp.v2i2.3048

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 2: Oktober 2015

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities tacitly or explicitly of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.

Copyright
Authors who publish with Jurnal Paedagogy agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Licensing for Data Publication

Jurnal Paedagogy use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.