The Effect of Problem-Based Digital Educational Technology on Students’ Achievement and Creativity in Chemistry Learning

Authors

  • Minglan Hou Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, China
  • I Wayan Santyasa Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Indonesia
  • Gede Rasben Dantes Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jp.v13i1.18473

Keywords:

problem-based digital learning, direct instruction, chemistry creativity, chemistry achievement

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effectiveness of problem-based digital learning in enhancing students’ chemistry achievement and creativity. A quasi-experimental design with pretest–posttest control groups was employed. The participants were second-year undergraduate chemistry students selected through purposive sampling to ensure comparable academic backgrounds. Two intact classes were assigned as the experimental and control groups to maintain ecological validity. The research instruments included a chemistry achievement test, a chemistry creativity scale, and a learning behavior observation sheet. Data were analyzed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), and thematic analysis for qualitative data. The results indicate that problem-based digital learning significantly improves students’ knowledge application, problem-solving skills, and chemistry creativity, particularly in terms of the uniqueness of experimental design, flexibility in solution optimization, and cross-context knowledge transfer. However, no significant difference was found between the two groups in the mastery of basic chemical knowledge. These findings suggest that chemistry instruction in higher education should move beyond the mere transmission of concepts toward problem-based digital learning that emphasizes application, problem solving, and creativity. The integration of authentic problems with virtual laboratory environments enables students to design experiments, test solutions, and transfer knowledge across contexts. In this approach, lecturers function as facilitators, while digital tools serve as cognitive instruments that bridge theoretical understanding and innovative chemical practice.

References

Ardhana, I. A. (2020). Penggunaan Aplikasi Google Classroom untuk Meningkatkan Persepsi Pembelajaran Digital Mahasiswa. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Kimia, 10(2), 88–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21009/JRPK.102.04

Byusa, E., Kampire, E., & Rwekaza, A. (2022). Heliyon Game-based learning approach on students ’ motivation and understanding of chemistry concepts : A systematic review of literature. HLY, 8(5), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09541

Candra, N., Setiawan, E., Herunata, H., & Rosli, M. S. (2025). The creativity of chemistry education students in the digital age. Eclética Química, 50(7), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.26850/1678-4618.eq.v50.2025.e1507 LicenseCC BY 4.0 Authors: Nur Candra Eka Setiawan State University of Malang Herunata Herunata State University of Malang Mohd Shafie Rosli University of Technology Malaysia

Constructivist, F., Kirschner, P. A., & Clark, R. E. (2014). Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work : An Analysis of the Work : An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist , Discovery , Problem-Based , Experiential , and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Dewi, C. A., Purmadi, A., & Mandalika, U. P. (2021). The Urgency of Digital Literacy for Generation Z Students in Chemistry Learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 6(11), 88–103. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i11.19871

de Jong, T., Linn, M. C., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2013). Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education. Science, 340(6130), 305–308. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230579

Diab, H., Daher, W., Rayan, B., & Issa, N. (2024). Transforming Science Education in Elementary Schools : The Power of PhET Simulations in Enhancing Student Learning. MDPI, 8(11), 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/mti8110105

Fit, C., Gonz, M., Madurga, S., Fuguet, E., & Costa, A. M. (2023). Problem-Based Learning in Graduate and Undergraduate Chemistry Courses: Face-to-Face and Online Experiences. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(2), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00741

Gazali, F., Rahayu, S., Munzil, M., Wonorahardjo, S., & Alam, M. D. (2025). Systematic literature review on the application of Problem-Based Learning model in chemistry education. Eclética Química, 50(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26850/1678-4618.eq.v50.2025.e1598

Prince, M. J. (2017). Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods : Definitions , Comparisons , and Research Bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(11), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x

Rahman, H., Abdul, S., & Faizan, W. (2024). Game-based learning in metaverse : Virtual chemistry classroom for chemical bonding for remote education. 29(12), 19595–19619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12575-5

Ramos, B., & Condotta, R. (2024). Enhancing Learning and Collaboration in a Unit Operations Course: Using AI as a Catalyst to Create Engaging Problem-Based Learning Scenarios. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(8), 3246–3254. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00244

Sandaram, M., Talib, C. A., Kang, H., & Wong, W. (2025). Promoting Problem Solving Ability in Enhancing Creative Reasoning through Adaptive Digital Game-Based Learning among Chemistry Undergraduate Students. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 1(1), 205–213. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.55.1.205213

Santyasa, I. W. (2021). Project Based E-Learning and Academic Procrastination of Students in Learning Chemistry. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 909–928. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14353a

Saputri, L. R., & Wisudawati, A. W. (2025). Validity Of Problem-Based Learning Teaching Module To Improve Critical Thinking Of High School Students On Atomic Structure Material Validity Of Problem-Based Learning Teaching. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Sains, 16(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/quantum.v16i1

Sarwar, M. N., Javed, Z., Farooq, M. S., Nazar, M. F., Wasti, S. H., Butt, I. H., Ansari, G. J., Basri, R., & Kulsoom, S. (2024). Impact of a Digital Growth Mindset on Enhancing the Motivation and Performance of Chemistry Students : A Non-Cognitive Approach. MDPI, 8(11), 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14080133

Warmansyah, J., Komalasari, E., & Febriani, E. (2022). Factors Affecting Teacher Readiness for Online Learning ( TROL ) in Early Childhood Education : TISE and TPACK. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN USIA DINI (JPUD), 16(1), 32–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21009/JPUD.161.03

Wohlfart, O., Wagner, A. L., & Wagner, I. (2023). Digital tools in secondary chemistry education – added value or modern gimmicks ? Frontiers in Education, 8(11), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1197296

Yasheni Raman, Johari Surif, N. H. I. (2024). The Effect of Problem Based Learning Approach in Enhancing Problem Solving Skills in Chemistry Education: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 18(5), 91–111. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v18i05.47929

Yesgat, D., Hailu, W., & Ayele, S. (2024). on students ’ achievement , attitude , and retention capacity : Education and Information Technologies, 29(11), 13763–13785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12411-2

Published

2026-01-06

How to Cite

Hou, M., Santyasa, I. W., & Dantes, G. R. (2026). The Effect of Problem-Based Digital Educational Technology on Students’ Achievement and Creativity in Chemistry Learning. Jurnal Paedagogy, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.33394/jp.v13i1.18473

Citation Check