Effects of Dizziness, Authenticity, and Satisfaction on Students’ Intention to Use VR in Vocational High School

Authors

  • Muhammad Haristo Rahman Civil Engineering and Planning Education, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia.
  • Amiruddin Mahmud Mechanical Engineering Education, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
  • Wirawan Setialaksana Informatics and Computer Engineering Education, Universitas Negeri Makassar.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jtp.v10i3.15295

Keywords:

Dizziness, Object and Activity Authenticity Virtual, Behavioral Intention, Vocational Education,

Abstract

The study aims to identify the influence of variables such as dizziness, activity-related authenticity, object-related authenticity, and satisfaction on students' behavioural intentions to continue using Virtual Reality (VR) technology in a learning context. In this study, path analysis was employed to ascertain the impact of dizziness on satisfaction and behavioural intentions in VR technology users. The findings of the study demonstrate a substantial negative correlation between dizziness and satisfaction, indicating that an escalation in dizziness levels is concomitant with a decline in satisfaction and behavioural intention to persist in utilising VR. Furthermore, activity-related authenticity and object-related authenticity have been demonstrated to exert a significant positive influence on behavioural intention, thereby indicating that students are more inclined to continue utilising VR technology if they perceive the activities and objects within VR as more authentic. The study also found that student satisfaction is the strongest factor in increasing behavioural intention to continue using VR, with path coefficients indicating a significant positive influence. The findings of this study provide important insights into the factors influencing students' behavioural intentions to continue using VR in learning. Consequently, it is anticipated that this study will contribute to the development and application of VR technology in the domain of vocational education. Moreover, it is expected to provide recommendations for technology developers and educators to design more effective and enjoyable learning experiences, taking into account the physical comfort and authenticity of the VR content used.

References

Ahn, Junyoung, Seungho Choi, Minjae Lee, and Kyungdoh Kim. 2017. “Investigating Key User Experience Factors for Virtual Reality Interactions.†Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea 36(4).

Ajzen, Icek. 1991. “The Theory of Planned Behavior.†Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50(2): 179–211. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/074959789190020T.

Al-Adwan, Ahmad Samed, and Mutaz M. Al-Debei. 2024. “The Determinants of Gen Z’s Metaverse Adoption Decisions in Higher Education: Integrating UTAUT2 with Personal Innovativeness in IT.†Education and Information Technologies 29(6).

Alinier, Guillaume, and Denis Oriot. 2022. “Simulation-Based Education: Deceiving Learners with Good Intent.†Advances in Simulation 7(1).

Azmi, Athira, Rahinah Ibrahim, Maszura Abdul Ghafar, and Ali Rashidi. 2023. “Metaverse for Real Estate Marketing: The Impact of Virtual Reality on Satisfaction, Perceived Enjoyment and Purchase Intention.†Research Square.

Cai, Zhihui et al. 2023. “The Effect of Feedback on Academic Achievement in Technology-Rich Learning Environments (TREs): A Meta-Analytic Review.†Educational Research Review 39.

Chang, Eunhee, Hyun Taek Kim, and Byounghyun Yoo. 2020. “Virtual Reality Sickness: A Review of Causes and Measurements.†International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction.

Chen, Ching Fu, and Fu Shian Chen. 2010. “Experience Quality, Perceived Value, Satisfaction and Behavioral Intentions for Heritage Tourists.†Tourism Management 31(1).

Chen, Jyunâ€Chen et al. 2020. “Developing a Handsâ€on Activity Using Virtual Reality to Help Students Learn by Doing.†Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 36(1): 46–60.

Higgins, Steven, Zhimin Xiao, and Maria Katsipataki. 2012. “The Impact of Digital Technology on Learning : A Summary for the Education Endowment Foundation Full Report.†Education Endowment Foundation November(November 2012).

Irshad, Shafaq. 2022. “Investigating the User Experience of IDN Based Virtual Reality Environments for Solving Complex Issues.†New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia 28(3–4).

Kavanagh, Sam, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, Burkhard Wuensche, and Beryl Plimmer. 2017. “A Systematic Review of Virtual Reality in Education.†Themes in science and technology education 10(2): 85–119.

Lowell, Victoria Lynn, and Deepti Tagare. 2023. “Authentic Learning and Fidelity in Virtual Reality Learning Experiences for Self-Efficacy and Transfer.†Computers & Education: X Reality 2.

Luo, Heng et al. 2021. “Virtual Reality in Kâ€12 and Higher Education: A Systematic Review of the Literature From 2000 to 2019.†Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 37(3): 887–901.

Madshaven, Julie Madelen et al. 2021. “Investigating the User Experience of Virtual Reality Rehabilitation Solution for Biomechatronics Laboratory and Home Environment.†Frontiers in Virtual Reality 2.

Mhlanga, David. 2024. “Digital Transformation of Education, the Limitations and Prospects of Introducing the Fourth Industrial Revolution Asynchronous Online Learning in Emerging Markets.†Discover Education 3(1): 32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00115-9.

Mimnaugh, Katherine J. et al. 2023. “Virtual Reality Sickness Reduces Attention During Immersive Experiences.†IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 29(11).

Nam, Kichan, Christopher S. Dutt, and Jeff Baker. 2023. “Authenticity in Objects and Activities: Determinants of Satisfaction with Virtual Reality Experiences of Heritage and Non-Heritage Tourism Sites.†Information Systems Frontiers 25(3).

Oliver, Richard L. 1980. “A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions.†Journal of Marketing Research 17(4).

Ravichandran, R. Ravichandran, and Jayashree Mahapatra. 2023. “Virtual Reality in Vocational Education and Training: Challenges and Possibilities.†Journal of Digital Learning and Education 3(1).

Rebenitsch, Lisa, and Charles Owen. 2016. “Review on Cybersickness in Applications and Visual Displays.†Virtual Reality 20(2).

Venkatesh, Viswanath, and Fred D. Davis. 2000. “Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies.†Management Science 46(2).

Wang, Chengliang et al. 2024. “Education Reform and Change Driven by Digital Technology: A Bibliometric Study from a Global Perspective.†Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11(1): 256. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02717-y.

Weech, Séamas, Sophie Kenny, and Michael Barnett-Cowan. 2019. “Presence and Cybersickness in Virtual Reality Are Negatively Related: A Review.†Frontiers in Psychology 10(FEB).

Yoon, Yooshik, and Muzaffer Uysal. 2005. “An Examination of the Effects of Motivation and Satisfaction on Destination Loyalty: A Structural Model.†Tourism Management 26(1).

Yu, Zhonggen, and Wei Xu. 2022. “A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Effect of Virtual Reality Technology on Users’ Learning Outcomes.†Computer Applications in Engineering Education 30(5).

Downloads

Published

2025-07-30

How to Cite

Rahman, M. H., Mahmud, A., & Setialaksana, W. (2025). Effects of Dizziness, Authenticity, and Satisfaction on Students’ Intention to Use VR in Vocational High School. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pembelajaran, 10(3), 582–592. https://doi.org/10.33394/jtp.v10i3.15295

Issue

Section

Articles