Modality Acts as a Strategic Pedagogical Support: Exploring Face, Stance, and Participation In EFL Learners’ Classroom Interactions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v14i2.18575Keywords:
Modality acts, English learning, Faces, Stances, Pedagogical support, Learning participationAbstract
The importance of understanding modality role as pedagogical support in helping EFL learners manage face, build stance, and regulate participation in higher education contexts. This study aims to explore how modalities function as pedagogical support in helping English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners manage face, negotiate stance, and regulate participation in a higher education learning context. Using a qualitative phenomenological approach, data were collected through in-depth interviews with 13 fifth-semester students of the English Language Education Study Program at Muhammadiyah University of Bulukumba. The research findings indicate that modalities—presented through text messages, voice recordings, emojis, gestures, intonation, and digital communication features—play a significant role in reducing anxiety, increasing self-confidence, and providing more flexible access to participation for students. Participants viewed modalities as “safe communication spaces” that allowed EFL students to express ideas, refine language structures before use, and negotiate meaning without direct pressure. To support language production, modalities also shape learners’ identities, social positioning, and emotional engagement in academic interactions. This study concludes that modality acts as a strategic pedagogical support that helps EFL learners manage their identity, attitudes, and participation more confidently and adaptively in academic interactions. The implication is that lecturers need to consciously integrate multimodal strategies into learning design to support face management, stance strengthening, and increasing students' participation. This study contributes the language pedagogy and sociolinguistics by asserting that modality functions as an interactional resource that mediates face management, stance formation, and participation structures in EF contexts.
References
Bagheri, M., & Mohamadi Zenouzagh, Z. (2021a). Comparative study of the effect of face-to-face and computer mediated conversation modalities on student engagement: Speaking skill in focus. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 6(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-020-00103-0
Bagheri, M., & Mohamadi Zenouzagh, Z. (2021b). Comparative study of the effect of face-to-face and computer mediated conversation modalities on student engagement: Speaking skill in focus. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 6(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-020-00103-0
Barira Ibraheem. (2025). Examining the Relationship between Classroom Questioning Techniques and Students’ Critical Engagement in ESL Higher Education Discussions Across Face-to-Face and Online Contexts through a Mixed-Methods Classroom Discourse Analysis. Social Science Review Archives, 3(4), 2909–2921. https://doi.org/10.70670/sra.v3i4.1388
Baskal, A. K., Sujarwo, & Muhammad Yahrif. (2024). Code-Mixing As a Communicative Strategy Among International Passengers and Employees in Hasanuddin International Airport Makassar. IJOLEH : International Journal of Education and Humanities, 3(1), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.56314/ijoleh.v3i1.222
Cho, M. (2018). Task Complexity and Modality: Exploring Learners’ Experience From the Perspective of Flow. The Modern Language Journal, 102(1), 162–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12460
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (Fourth Indian edition). PHI Learning Private Limited.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed). SAGE Publications.
Crosthwaite, P. R., Bailey, D. R., & Meeker, A. (2015). Assessing in-class participation for EFL: Considerations of effectiveness and fairness for different learning styles. Language Testing in Asia, 5(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-015-0017-1
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (Fifth Edition). SAGE Publications.
Evnitskaya, N., & Berger, E. (2017). Learners’ Multimodal Displays of Willingness to Participate in Classroom Interaction in the L2 and CLIL Contexts. Classroom Discourse, 8(1), 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2016.1272062
García-Carrión, R., Villardón-Gallego, L., Martínez-de-la-Hidalga, Z., & Marauri, J. (2020). Exploring the Impact of Dialogic Literary Gatherings on Students’ Relationships With a Communicative Approach. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(8–9), 996–1002. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420938879
Grapin, S. (2019). Multimodality in the New Content Standards Era: Implications for English Learners. TESOL Quarterly, 53(1), 30–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.443
Guo, X. (2023). Multimodality in language education: Implications of a multimodal affective perspective in foreign language teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1283625. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1283625
Heilporn, G., & Lakhal, S. (2021). Converting a graduate-level course into a HyFlex modality: What are effective engagement strategies? The International Journal of Management Education, 19(1), 100454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100454
Helou, M. M., & Newsome, L. K. (2018). Application of Lev Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Approach to Foster Students’ Understanding and Learning Performance. Journal of Education and Culture Studies, 2(4), 347. https://doi.org/10.22158/jecs.v2n4p347
Jubhari, Y., Aziz, A., Idham, A. Z., & Rajab, A. (2024). English for Specific Purposes (ESP) Materials Based on Needs Analysis for Nursing Students in Facing the Society 5.0 Era. Education, Language, and Culture (EDULEC), 4(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56314/edulec.v4i1
Kartal, G. (2023). Using movie trailers to enhance both f2f and online language learning outcomes in an EFL speaking class. Porta Linguarum Revista Interuniversitaria de Didáctica de Las Lenguas Extranjeras, (39), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi39.22513
Li, M. (2020). Multimodal pedagogy in TESOL teacher education: Students’ perspectives. System, 94, 102337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102337
Liu, Y., Jang, B. G., & Roy-Campbell, Z. (2018). Optimum input mode in the modality and redundancy principles for university ESL students’ multimedia learning. Computers & Education, 127, 190–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.025
Nazarova, O. K., Yarmakeev, I. E., Pimenova, T. S., Abdrafikova, A. R., & Tregubova, T. M. (2018). We Should, We Must, or We Have to Learn Modal Verbs: New Approaches to Teaching Modals in Efl Class. Herald NAMSCA, 3, 612–616.
Noël, R., Miranda, D., Cechinel, C., Riquelme, F., Primo, T. T., & Munoz, R. (2022). Visualizing Collaboration in Teamwork: A Multimodal Learning Analytics Platform for Non-Verbal Communication. Applied Sciences, 12(15), 7499. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12157499
O’Neill, K., Lopes, N., Nesbit, J., Reinhardt, S., & Jayasundera, K. (2021). Modeling undergraduates’ selection of course modality: A large sample, multi-discipline study. The Internet and Higher Education, 48, 100776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100776
Qin, Y., & Wang, P. (2021a). How EFL Teachers Engage Students: A Multimodal Analysis of Pedagogic Discourse During Classroom Lead-Ins. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 793495. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.793495
Qin, Y., & Wang, P. (2021b). How EFL Teachers Engage Students: A Multimodal Analysis of Pedagogic Discourse During Classroom Lead-Ins. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 793495. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.793495
Richards, K. A. R., & Hemphill, M. A. (2018). A Practical Guide to Collaborative Qualitative Data Analysis. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 37(2), 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2017-0084
Sujarwo, Asdar, Asdam, M., Syam, N. I., & Limbong, S. (2026). Fostering Digital Critical Thinking within the Integrated Approach. XLinguae, 19(4), 603. https://doi.org/https://www.xlinguae.eu/2026_19_1_1.htm
Sukmawati, Rosmayanti, V., Amin, S., Sujarwo, Akhiruddin, Christo, Y., & Khatima, C. (2025). Empowering the Implementation of Self-Regulated Learning Through Project-Based Learning (PjBL) in English Instruction. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 58(1), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v58i1.82086
Syam, N. I., Ulfa, A. Y., Room, F., Riskayadi, R., & Ibrahim, M. (2025). Speaking with Care, Thinking with Depth: How Modality Shapes Critical Thinking and Engagement in EFL Learners’ Classroom Interaction. REILA: Journal of Research and Innovation in Language, 7(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31849/reila.vxxx
Trisanti, N., Suherdi, D., & Sukyadi, D. (2022). Multimodality Reflected in EFL Teaching Materials: Indonesian EFL In-Service Teacher’s Multimodality Literacy Perception. LANGUAGE CIRCLE: Journal of Language and Literature, 17(1). https://doi.org/http://journal.unnes.ac.id
Virtanen, T., & Lee, C. (2022). Face-work in online discourse: Practices and multiple conceptualizations. Journal of Pragmatics, 195, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.03.013
Wigham, C. R. (2017). A multimodal analysis of lexical explanation sequences in webconferencing-supported language teaching. Language Learning in Higher Education, 7(1), 81–108. https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2017-0001
Zakaria, F. B., Magfirah, S., Sasabone, L., & Ramlan, N. A. (2025). Integrating Literary Studies into English Language Teaching: Enhancing Critical Thinking and Communicative Competence. IJOLEH : International Journal of Education and Humanities, 4(2), 240–255. https://doi.org/10.56314/ijoleh.v4i2.421
Zhang, L., & Hwang, Y. (2023). “Should I change myself or not?”: Examining (Re)constructed language teacher identity during the COVID-19 pandemic through text-mining. Teaching and Teacher Education, 127, 104092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104092
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nur Ina Syam, Ahmad Arkam Ramadhani, Sri Wahyuni Thamrin, Fahmi Room, Andi Yurni Ulfa, Suraiya Chapakiya

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
-
Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.














