Modality Acts as a Strategic Pedagogical Support: Exploring Face, Stance, and Participation In EFL Learners’ Classroom Interactions

Authors

  • Nur Ina Syam Universitas Muhammadiyah Bulukumba, Indonesia
  • Ahmad Arkam Ramadhani Universitas Muhammadiyah Bulukumba, Indonesia
  • Sri Wahyuni Thamrin Universitas Muhammadiyah Bulukumba, Indonesia
  • Fahmi Room Universitas Muhammadiyah Bulukumba, Indonesia
  • Andi Yurni Ulfa Universitas Muhammadiyah Bulukumba, Indonesia
  • Suraiya Chapakiya Fatoni University, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v14i2.18575

Keywords:

Modality acts, English learning, Faces, Stances, Pedagogical support, Learning participation

Abstract

The importance of understanding modality role as pedagogical support in helping EFL learners manage face, build stance, and regulate participation in higher education contexts. This study aims to explore how modalities function as pedagogical support in helping English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners manage face, negotiate stance, and regulate participation in a higher education learning context. Using a qualitative phenomenological approach, data were collected through in-depth interviews with 13 fifth-semester students of the English Language Education Study Program at Muhammadiyah University of Bulukumba. The research findings indicate that modalities—presented through text messages, voice recordings, emojis, gestures, intonation, and digital communication features—play a significant role in reducing anxiety, increasing self-confidence, and providing more flexible access to participation for students. Participants viewed modalities as “safe communication spaces” that allowed EFL students to express ideas, refine language structures before use, and negotiate meaning without direct pressure. To support language production, modalities also shape learners’ identities, social positioning, and emotional engagement in academic interactions. This study concludes that modality acts as a strategic pedagogical support that helps EFL learners manage their identity, attitudes, and participation more confidently and adaptively in academic interactions. The implication is that lecturers need to consciously integrate multimodal strategies into learning design to support face management, stance strengthening, and increasing students' participation. This study contributes the language pedagogy and sociolinguistics by asserting that modality functions as an interactional resource that mediates face management, stance formation, and participation structures in EF contexts.

Author Biographies

Nur Ina Syam, Universitas Muhammadiyah Bulukumba

Graduate Program of English Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Jl. Ir. Soekarno No. 9, Ujung Bulu, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

Ahmad Arkam Ramadhani, Universitas Muhammadiyah Bulukumba

English Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Jl. Ir. Soekarno No. 9, Ujung Bulu, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

Sri Wahyuni Thamrin, Universitas Muhammadiyah Bulukumba

 

English Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Bulukumba, Jl. Ir. Soekarno No. 9, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

Fahmi Room, Universitas Muhammadiyah Bulukumba

Graduate Program of English Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Bulukumba, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

Andi Yurni Ulfa, Universitas Muhammadiyah Bulukumba

English Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Bulukumba, Jl. Ir. Soekarno No. 9, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

Suraiya Chapakiya, Fatoni University

Department of Malay Language, Faculty of Liberal Arts & Social Science, Fatoni University, 135/8 Moo 3, Tambon Khao Tum, Pattani, Thailand

References

Bagheri, M., & Mohamadi Zenouzagh, Z. (2021a). Comparative study of the effect of face-to-face and computer mediated conversation modalities on student engagement: Speaking skill in focus. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 6(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-020-00103-0

Bagheri, M., & Mohamadi Zenouzagh, Z. (2021b). Comparative study of the effect of face-to-face and computer mediated conversation modalities on student engagement: Speaking skill in focus. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 6(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-020-00103-0

Barira Ibraheem. (2025). Examining the Relationship between Classroom Questioning Techniques and Students’ Critical Engagement in ESL Higher Education Discussions Across Face-to-Face and Online Contexts through a Mixed-Methods Classroom Discourse Analysis. Social Science Review Archives, 3(4), 2909–2921. https://doi.org/10.70670/sra.v3i4.1388

Baskal, A. K., Sujarwo, & Muhammad Yahrif. (2024). Code-Mixing As a Communicative Strategy Among International Passengers and Employees in Hasanuddin International Airport Makassar. IJOLEH : International Journal of Education and Humanities, 3(1), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.56314/ijoleh.v3i1.222

Cho, M. (2018). Task Complexity and Modality: Exploring Learners’ Experience From the Perspective of Flow. The Modern Language Journal, 102(1), 162–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12460

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (Fourth Indian edition). PHI Learning Private Limited.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed). SAGE Publications.

Crosthwaite, P. R., Bailey, D. R., & Meeker, A. (2015). Assessing in-class participation for EFL: Considerations of effectiveness and fairness for different learning styles. Language Testing in Asia, 5(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-015-0017-1

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (Fifth Edition). SAGE Publications.

Evnitskaya, N., & Berger, E. (2017). Learners’ Multimodal Displays of Willingness to Participate in Classroom Interaction in the L2 and CLIL Contexts. Classroom Discourse, 8(1), 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2016.1272062

García-Carrión, R., Villardón-Gallego, L., Martínez-de-la-Hidalga, Z., & Marauri, J. (2020). Exploring the Impact of Dialogic Literary Gatherings on Students’ Relationships With a Communicative Approach. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(8–9), 996–1002. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420938879

Grapin, S. (2019). Multimodality in the New Content Standards Era: Implications for English Learners. TESOL Quarterly, 53(1), 30–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.443

Guo, X. (2023). Multimodality in language education: Implications of a multimodal affective perspective in foreign language teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1283625. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1283625

Heilporn, G., & Lakhal, S. (2021). Converting a graduate-level course into a HyFlex modality: What are effective engagement strategies? The International Journal of Management Education, 19(1), 100454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100454

Helou, M. M., & Newsome, L. K. (2018). Application of Lev Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Approach to Foster Students’ Understanding and Learning Performance. Journal of Education and Culture Studies, 2(4), 347. https://doi.org/10.22158/jecs.v2n4p347

Jubhari, Y., Aziz, A., Idham, A. Z., & Rajab, A. (2024). English for Specific Purposes (ESP) Materials Based on Needs Analysis for Nursing Students in Facing the Society 5.0 Era. Education, Language, and Culture (EDULEC), 4(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56314/edulec.v4i1

Kartal, G. (2023). Using movie trailers to enhance both f2f and online language learning outcomes in an EFL speaking class. Porta Linguarum Revista Interuniversitaria de Didáctica de Las Lenguas Extranjeras, (39), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi39.22513

Li, M. (2020). Multimodal pedagogy in TESOL teacher education: Students’ perspectives. System, 94, 102337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102337

Liu, Y., Jang, B. G., & Roy-Campbell, Z. (2018). Optimum input mode in the modality and redundancy principles for university ESL students’ multimedia learning. Computers & Education, 127, 190–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.025

Nazarova, O. K., Yarmakeev, I. E., Pimenova, T. S., Abdrafikova, A. R., & Tregubova, T. M. (2018). We Should, We Must, or We Have to Learn Modal Verbs: New Approaches to Teaching Modals in Efl Class. Herald NAMSCA, 3, 612–616.

Noël, R., Miranda, D., Cechinel, C., Riquelme, F., Primo, T. T., & Munoz, R. (2022). Visualizing Collaboration in Teamwork: A Multimodal Learning Analytics Platform for Non-Verbal Communication. Applied Sciences, 12(15), 7499. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12157499

O’Neill, K., Lopes, N., Nesbit, J., Reinhardt, S., & Jayasundera, K. (2021). Modeling undergraduates’ selection of course modality: A large sample, multi-discipline study. The Internet and Higher Education, 48, 100776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100776

Qin, Y., & Wang, P. (2021a). How EFL Teachers Engage Students: A Multimodal Analysis of Pedagogic Discourse During Classroom Lead-Ins. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 793495. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.793495

Qin, Y., & Wang, P. (2021b). How EFL Teachers Engage Students: A Multimodal Analysis of Pedagogic Discourse During Classroom Lead-Ins. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 793495. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.793495

Richards, K. A. R., & Hemphill, M. A. (2018). A Practical Guide to Collaborative Qualitative Data Analysis. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 37(2), 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2017-0084

Sujarwo, Asdar, Asdam, M., Syam, N. I., & Limbong, S. (2026). Fostering Digital Critical Thinking within the Integrated Approach. XLinguae, 19(4), 603. https://doi.org/https://www.xlinguae.eu/2026_19_1_1.htm

Sukmawati, Rosmayanti, V., Amin, S., Sujarwo, Akhiruddin, Christo, Y., & Khatima, C. (2025). Empowering the Implementation of Self-Regulated Learning Through Project-Based Learning (PjBL) in English Instruction. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 58(1), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v58i1.82086

Syam, N. I., Ulfa, A. Y., Room, F., Riskayadi, R., & Ibrahim, M. (2025). Speaking with Care, Thinking with Depth: How Modality Shapes Critical Thinking and Engagement in EFL Learners’ Classroom Interaction. REILA: Journal of Research and Innovation in Language, 7(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31849/reila.vxxx

Trisanti, N., Suherdi, D., & Sukyadi, D. (2022). Multimodality Reflected in EFL Teaching Materials: Indonesian EFL In-Service Teacher’s Multimodality Literacy Perception. LANGUAGE CIRCLE: Journal of Language and Literature, 17(1). https://doi.org/http://journal.unnes.ac.id

Virtanen, T., & Lee, C. (2022). Face-work in online discourse: Practices and multiple conceptualizations. Journal of Pragmatics, 195, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.03.013

Wigham, C. R. (2017). A multimodal analysis of lexical explanation sequences in webconferencing-supported language teaching. Language Learning in Higher Education, 7(1), 81–108. https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2017-0001

Zakaria, F. B., Magfirah, S., Sasabone, L., & Ramlan, N. A. (2025). Integrating Literary Studies into English Language Teaching: Enhancing Critical Thinking and Communicative Competence. IJOLEH : International Journal of Education and Humanities, 4(2), 240–255. https://doi.org/10.56314/ijoleh.v4i2.421

Zhang, L., & Hwang, Y. (2023). “Should I change myself or not?”: Examining (Re)constructed language teacher identity during the COVID-19 pandemic through text-mining. Teaching and Teacher Education, 127, 104092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104092

Downloads

Published

2026-04-17

How to Cite

Syam, N. I., Ramadhani, A. A., Thamrin, S. W., Room, F., Ulfa, A. Y., & Chapakiya, S. (2026). Modality Acts as a Strategic Pedagogical Support: Exploring Face, Stance, and Participation In EFL Learners’ Classroom Interactions. JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 14(2), 692–703. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v14i2.18575

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check