Power and Politeness: A Pragmatic Analysis of Managerial Hierarchies in School Settings

Authors

  • Lastri Wahyuni Manurung Universitas HKBP Nommensen, Indonesia
  • Benya Lertsuwan Payap University, Thailand
  • Eka Putri Saptari Wulan HKBP Nommensen University, Indonesia
  • Carolina Carolina HKBP Nommensen University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v14i1.18377

Keywords:

Communication, Politeness, Language Power, Pragmatics, School Environment

Abstract

This study investigates how power relations influence the use of politeness strategies in direct communication within a hierarchical school environment. Grounded in Brown and Levinson’s (1987) politeness theory and the pragmatic perspective of speech acts, the research aims to identify the types and sub-strategies of politeness used by speakers, examine how hierarchical status affects linguistic choices, and interpret the implied meanings behind politeness in institutional interactions. Using a qualitative descriptive design, data were collected through natural conversations and contextual interviews involving participants at different managerial levels: headmaster, vice principals, teachers, students, and cleaning staff. The findings reveal a strong tendency toward negative politeness (82.70%), expressed through apology, hedging, deference, and indirectness, reflecting a heightened awareness of institutional hierarchy. Positive politeness (9.20%) appears in horizontal interactions emphasizing solidarity, while off-record politeness (8.10%) is used primarily by lower-status participants to minimize social risk. These patterns demonstrate that linguistic politeness functions as a pragmatic tool for negotiating power and maintaining harmony in the school context. The study contributes to a deeper understanding of language use in hierarchical educational environments and highlights the importance of strengthening pragmatic awareness among school personnel. Practically, the results imply the need for communication training programs that help teachers and school leaders develop respectful, effective, and context-sensitive communication practices.

Author Biographies

Lastri Wahyuni Manurung, Universitas HKBP Nommensen

English Education Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, HKBP Nommensen University, Indonesia

Benya Lertsuwan, Payap University

Payap University

Eka Putri Saptari Wulan, HKBP Nommensen University

Indonesian Language and Literature Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, HKBP Nommensen University, Indonesia

Carolina Carolina, HKBP Nommensen University

English Education Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, HKBP Nommensen University, Indonesia

References

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1992). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Reprint ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Cahyani, D., & Rokhman, F. (2017). Kesantunan berbahasa mahasiswa dalam berinteraksi di lingkungan Universitas Tidar: Kajian sosiopragmatik. Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 6(1), 44–52.

Eelen, G. (2001). A critique of politeness theories. Routledge.

Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Anchor Books.

Goody, E. N. (Ed.). (1980). Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction. Cambridge University Press.

Hamsah, H., Nurdin, N., & Aswad, M. (2023). Politeness strategies in the context of relative power: Evidence from educational settings. Journal of Indonesian Society of Humanities, 12(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.xxxxx/jish.2023.12.2.115

Haugh, M., & Chang, W. (2019). Power, solidarity, and im/politeness in institutional interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 148, 90–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.06.004

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Sage Publications.

Holmes, J. (2013). An introduction to sociolinguistics (4th ed.). Routledge.

House, J. (2021). Pragmatics across languages and cultures. De Gruyter Mouton.

Kemala, A. (2021). Politeness strategies used by teachers in SMPN 28 Johor Medan. Attractive Journal of Language Education Studies, 3(2), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.xxxxx/attractive.2021.3.2.55

Lakoff, R. (1973). The logic of politeness: Or minding your p’s and q’s. Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 9, 292–305.

Leech, G. N. (2014). The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford University Press.

Márquez Reiter, R. (2020). Pragmatics and power. In M. Haugh (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics (pp. 401–420). Cambridge University Press.

Santoso, D., & Yulianti, N. (2023). Politeness strategies in teacher–student interaction in EFL classroom. El-Ibtikar: Journal of Arabic Linguistics and Literature, 6(1), 42–57. https://doi.org/10.xxxxx/elibtikar.2023.6.1.42

Sifianou, M. (2019). Politeness and impoliteness: A dynamic approach. Journal of Pragmatics, 145, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.03.007

Spencer-Oatey, H. (2008). Culturally speaking: Culture, communication and politeness theory (2nd ed.). Continuum.

Susanto, H., & Yahmun. (2022). Politeness strategies in EFL learners’ communication: A pragmatic perspective. Paradigma: Journal of Language and Literature Education, 9(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.xxxxx/paradigma.2022.9.1.1

Terkourafi, M. (2015). Interdisciplinary perspectives on im/politeness. John Benjamins Publishing.

Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge University Press.

Yule, G. (2020). Pragmatics (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-22

How to Cite

Manurung, L. W., Lertsuwan, B., Wulan, E. P. S., & Carolina, C. (2026). Power and Politeness: A Pragmatic Analysis of Managerial Hierarchies in School Settings. JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 14(1), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v14i1.18377

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check