Analyzing Higher and Lower Order Thinking Skills in the “English for Nusantara” Grade VIII Textbook Reading Comprehension Exercises
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v14i1.17507Keywords:
Higher Order Thinking Skills, Lower Order Thinking Skills, Reading Comprehension, Reading Exercises, Textbook AnalysisAbstract
Textbooks serve an important impact in molding students' learning outcomes, especially in terms of reading comprehension and cognitive skills. Recent research on Indonesian EFL textbooks, however, indicates that comprehension tasks are frequently dominated by lower level thinking skills (LOTS), with few possibilities for higher order thinking skills (HOTS). The purpose of this study is to determine the extent to which LOTS and HOTS are reflected in the reading comprehension activities of the English for Nusantara textbook. A qualitative content analysis approach was used to assess 64 reading comprehension questions from five chapters using Bloom's Revised Taxonomy. The data suggest that LOTS are more prominently represented (64%), particularly at the remembering and comprehending levels, while HOTS appear to a lesser extent (36%) while analyzing and assessing activities. The generating level (C6) was missing from all chapters. Although the cognitive requirement gradually increased in later chapters, the overall distribution remained imbalanced, with LOTS dominating the majority of activities. Beyond description, these findings have practical ramifications. Teachers are encouraged to enhance their classroom practice by including HOTS-oriented activities such as debates, project-based learning, and creative writing projects to build evaluation and creation abilities. Textbook authors and curriculum developers, meanwhile, should redesign future editions to include a more balanced number of LOTS and HOTS, ensuring that comprehension exercises not only strengthen core literacy but also challenge students to think critically and creatively. By doing so, textbooks can better connect with the ideals of the Kurikulum Merdeka and the Profil Pelajar Pancasila.
References
Al-Qahtani, M. F. (2019). Teachers’ and students’ perceptions of higher-order thinking skills: A case study. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(9), 1–14.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Irvine, C. K. S., & Walker, D. A. (2018). Introduction to research in education (10th ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning.
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts (7th ed.). Insight Assessment. (Paper)
Febrina, W., Usman, B., & Muslem, A. (2019). Analysis of reading comprehension questions by using Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy on higher order thinking skill (HOTS). English Education Journal, 10(1), 1–15. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v9i1.1904
Febriyani, R. A., Yunita, W., & Damayanti, I. (2020). An analysis on higher order thinking skill (HOTS) in compulsory English textbook for the twelfth grade of Indonesian senior high schools. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 4(2), 170–183. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.4.2.170-183
Fitriana, D. (2023). A review of English textbooks used in Indonesian junior high schools under Kurikulum Merdeka. Journal of English Language and Education, 9(1), 45–52.
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2013). Teaching and researching reading (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833743
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2019). Teaching and researching reading (3rd ed.). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315726274
Handayani, T., & Sari, R. (2023). Evaluating English textbooks based on HOTS indicators in secondary education. Journal of English Language Studies, 8(1), 43–57.
Hermagustiana, I., & Rusilowati, A. (2021). Analyzing higher order thinking skills in English reading comprehension questions. Linguists: Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 7(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.29300/ling.v7i2.5030
Syahid, A. (2024). An analysis of textbook When English Rings a Bell for junior high school grade eight. https://doi.org/10.54259/diajar.v3i3.2500
Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Panduan Kurikulum Merdeka jenjang SMP. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
Krippendorff, K. (2022). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Qasrawi, S., & Beni Abdelrahman, A. (2020). Evaluating English textbook questions for the intermediate stage in Saudi Arabia according to Bloom’s Taxonomy. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 10(10), 1173–1180. (Paper)
Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. London: SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529682571
Setyowati, L., & Sukmawan, S. (2019). Developing students’ critical thinking through reading literary texts. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 4(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v4i1.222
Shabrina, N., Basthomi, Y., & Zen, E. L. (2021). The cognitive levels of questions in ELT textbooks: A case of When English Rings a Bell for Grade VII. Englisia: Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities, 9(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v12i2.29201
Shalihah, M., Fikri, D., & Mustofa, M. (2022). Analyzing higher order thinking skills (HOTS) questions of reading essay tasks in senior high school English textbook. English Education Journal, 13(1), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.24815/eej.v13i1.23956
Sihombing, P., & Fitrawati, F. (2023). An analysis of higher-order thinking skills in reading comprehension exercises of Pathway to English for Grade X students. Journal of English Language Teaching, 12(2), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v12i2.537
Singh, C. K. S., & Marappan, P. (2020). A review of research on the importance of higher order thinking skills (HOTS) in teaching English language. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(08), 740–747. (Paper)
Sucipto, M., & Cahyo, A. (2019). The cognitive level of reading comprehension questions in the English national examination. Lingua Pedagogia, 1(2), 55–64.
Surono, S., Pratolo, B. W., & Hanun, S. L. (2023). Analysis of HOTS and LOTS of instructional questions in the English textbook When English Rings a Bell for grade VIII. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 5(3), 240–252. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v5i3.8168
Wilson, L. O. (2016). Anderson and Krathwohl Bloom's taxonomy revised. The Second Principle. (Paper)
Widodo, H. P. (2018). A critical micro-semiotic analysis of values depicted in the Indonesian Ministry of National Education-endorsed secondary school English textbook. Journal of Language and Education, 4(2), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63677-1_8
Xie, Y. (2024). An analysis of higher-order thinking skills in Chinese senior high school English textbooks. Asian ESP Journal, 20(2), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241280457
Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2017). Qualitative analysis of content. In B. M. Wildemuth (Ed.), Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science (pp. 318–329). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. J. (2003). Higher order thinking skills and low‐achieving students: Are they mutually exclusive? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 145–181. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1202_1
Zubaidah. HOTS: Challenges and efforts in implementing 21st-century learning in Indonesia. 3rd International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nina Puspitaloka, Ermanto Ermanto, Yetti Zainil
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
-
Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
