Reading Strategies of Multilingual ESL Learners across Culturally Familiar and Unfamiliar Texts in Eswatini
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/jo-elt.v12i2.17710Keywords:
ESL learners, Cultural familiarity, Metacognitive strategies, Reading comprehension, Reading strategiesAbstract
Reading comprehension in multilingual contexts requires more than linguistic competence; it demands metacognitive regulation and strategic flexibility across culturally diverse materials. This study investigates the reading strategies employed by Eswatini English as a Second Language (ESL) learners when engaging with culturally familiar and culturally unfamiliar texts, addressing the limited evidence on strategy transfer within multilingual African contexts. A quantitative repeated-measures design was used with 200 Eswatini senior secondary learners, who each read two passages matched in length and readability, one culturally familiar and one culturally distant, and reported their strategy use using the Survey of Reading Strategies (SORS). Results revealed moderate and stable engagement across Global, Support, and Problem-Solving strategies, with Problem-Solving strategies employed slightly more frequently but without statistically significant differences between text types. Correlational analyses indicated a moderate relationship between familiar and unfamiliar text strategy use, suggesting that learners relied on habitual, routine behaviours rather than adaptive, metacognitively guided strategies. Based on these findings, the study proposes the Strategic Engagement and Transfer (SET) Model, which conceptualises a developmental progression from habitual, inconsistent strategy use to conscious, context-aware deployment, and ultimately integrated, automatic strategic competence. The findings inform English Language Teaching (ELT) by offering a context-sensitive metacognitive framework for scaffolding strategy instruction, promoting adaptive engagement, and fostering transferable reading competence across culturally diverse texts.
References
Afflerbach, P., Hurt, M., & Cho, B. Y. (2020). Reading comprehension strategy instruction. In Handbook of strategies and strategic processing (pp. 98–118). Routledge.
Ahmed, M. N. (2024). The role of cognitive schema theory in the translation from Arabic into English. Al-Noor Journal for Humanities, 2(3), 37–70. https://doi.org/10.69513/jnfh.v2n3.en2
Alford, S., & Teater, B. (2025). Quantitative research. In Handbook of research methods in social work (pp. 156–171). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035310173.00023
Anderson, R. C. (2018). Role of the reader’s schema in comprehension, learning, and memory. In Theoretical models and processes of literacy (pp. 136–145). Routledge.
Coe, R., Waring, M., Hedges, L. V., & Ashley, L. D. (Eds.). (2025). Research methods and methodologies in education. SAGE Publications.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
Dermitzaki, I. (2025). Fostering elementary school students’ self-regulation skills in reading comprehension: Effects on text comprehension, strategy use, and self-efficacy. Behavioral Sciences, 15(2), 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15020101
Emmott, C., & Alexander, M. (2025). Schema theory. In J. Alber & R. Schneider (Eds.), The Routledge companion to literature and cognitive studies (pp. 83–96). Routledge.
Examinations Council of Eswatini. (2023). Eswatini General Certificate of Secondary Education (EGCSE) English examination report. ECESWA Printer.
Ghimire, N., & Mokhtari, K. (2025). Evaluating the predictive power of metacognitive reading strategies across diverse educational contexts. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 13(1), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-025-00240-3
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2022). Principles for reading instruction. In Handbook of practical second language teaching and learning (pp. 357–369). Routledge.
Hinton, P. R. (2024). Statistics explained. Routledge.
Jiang, H., & Zhang, S. (2025). The application of schema theory to English reading teaching in senior high school. Literature Language and Cultural Studies, 1(3), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.63313/LLCS.9035
Karami, A., & Bowles, F. A. (2021). Text-relevant video segments and reading comprehension of culturally unfamiliar texts with adult speakers of English as a second language (ESL). English Language Teaching, 14(10), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n10p35
Köse, N., & Güneş, F. (2021). Undergraduate students’ use of metacognitive strategies while reading and the relationship between strategy use and reading comprehension skills. Journal of Education and Learning, 10(2), 99. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v10n2p99
Kunene, M. W., & Mthethwa, P. (2020). The deductive and inductive instructional approach controversy in the Eswatini context. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 10(2). www.gjflt.eu
List, A., Campos Oaxaca, G. S., Du, H., Lee, H. Y., & Lyu, B. (2024). Critical culturalized comprehension: Exploring culture as learners’ thinking about texts. Educational Psychologist, 59(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2023.2266028
Mežek, Š., McGrath, L., Negretti, R., & Berggren, J. (2022). Scaffolding L2 academic reading and self-regulation through task and feedback. TESOL Quarterly, 56(1), 41–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3018
Ministry of Education and Training. (2018). National education and training sector policy.
Mokhtari, K., & Sheorey, R. (2002). Measuring ESL students’ awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Developmental Education, 25(3), 2–11.
Mokhtari, K., Dimitrov, D. M., & Reichard, C. A. (2018). Revising the Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory (MARSI) and testing for factorial invariance. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 219–246. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.2.3
Moradi, E., & Ghabanchi, Z. (2025). Scrutinizing the role of foreign language reading anxiety in the application of cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies. Learning: Research and Practice, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2024.2448459
Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(5), 625–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y
Okyar, H. (2021). Turkish EFL learners’ reading strategy use and its relation to reading self-efficacy and gender. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 21(1), 116–130. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/4748476
Oxford, R. L. (2017). Teaching and researching language learning strategies: Self-regulation in context. Routledge.
Pahrizal, N., Vintoni, A., Sotlikova, R., & Ya’akub, H. Z. H. (2025). Metacognitive reading strategies and their impact on comprehension: Insights from rural EFL learners. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education, 7(1), 18–36. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v7i1.23908
Rumelhart, D. E. (2017). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 33–50). Routledge.
Salsyabillah, M., Putri, Manurung, S., & Adam, A. (2025). The correlation between students’ metacognitive reading strategies and reading comprehension. Didaktika: Jurnal Kependidikan, 14(2). https://jurnaldidaktika.org
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.). (2023). Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications. Taylor & Francis.
Sisay, T. D., & Gebeyehu, A. H. (2025). The role of cognitive, metacognitive, and environmental strategies in students’ reading comprehension and strategy use: Focus on sixth grade students. Ethiopian Journal of Language, Culture and Communication, 10(1), 152–182. https://doi.org/10.20372/ejlcc.v10i1.1929
South, L., Saffo, D., Vitek, O., Dunne, C., & Borkin, M. A. (2022). Effective use of Likert scales in visualization evaluations: A systematic review. Computer Graphics Forum, 41(3), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.14521
Stockemer, D. (2019). Quantitative methods for the social sciences: A practical introduction with examples in SPSS and Stata. Springer International Publishing.
Streiner, D. L., Norman, G. R., & Cairney, J. (2024). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford University Press.
Sweller, J. (2024). Cognitive load theory and individual differences. Learning and Individual Differences, Article 102423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102423
Toti, U. S., & Hamid, S. A. (2022). An exploratory study of culturally familiar or unfamiliar texts contributing to reading comprehension in EFL context. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(5), 981–989. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1305.10
Tsai, R. R., & Huang, S. C. (2024). EFL reading strategies used by high school students with different English proficiency. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 5(3), Article 1885. https://doi.org/10.59400/fls.v5i3.1855
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mfanukhona Wonderboy Kunene, Nicholus Nyika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities “tacitly or explicitly“ of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
- Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1.jpg)
