Developing and Validating a SMART-Based Writing Materials Framework for Pre-Service EFL Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/jo-elt.v12i2.17689Keywords:
SMART framework, Successive Approximation Model (SAM), EFL writing instruction, Pre-service EFL teachers, Instructional designAbstract
Writing competence remains a critical yet challenging component of EFL teacher education, particularly in enabling pre-service teachers to design scaffolded, measurable, and genre-sensitive instructional objectives. Although the SMART framework (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound) has been widely adopted in instructional planning, its systematic application and validation within writing pedagogy remain limited. Addressing this gap, the present study aimed to develop and validate a SMART-based instructional framework refined through the iterative Successive Approximation Model (SAM). Adopting a mixed-methods research and development (R&D) design, the study followed successive phases of preparation, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. The framework was validated by expert reviewers in language, material, and media, and subsequently trialed with fifth- and seventh-semester pre-service EFL teachers. Quantitative data were collected through validation instruments and competence assessments, while qualitative data were obtained from participant feedback, instructional artifacts, and reflective responses. Descriptive and inferential analyses indicated that the framework demonstrated strong content validity and instructional relevance, although aspects of practicality required further refinement. The iterative nature of SAM facilitated continuous improvement based on expert and user feedback, resulting in a more responsive and learner-centered design. The findings suggest that the SMART-based framework effectively enhances pre-service teachers’ competence in formulating instructional objectives for writing and functions as both a developmental and diagnostic tool in teacher education. This study contributes a praxis-oriented instructional framework that bridges theoretical rigor and classroom applicability, with implications for curriculum integration, genre-based scaffolding, and future development of technology-enhanced instructional supports.
References
Anggarini, I. F. (2022). Insertion the values of religious moderation on Indonesian EFL class. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 4(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.18860/jetle.v4i1.17744
Bazari, N. A. (2019). Online case-based problem-solving module for ESL teacher education. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(13), 400–415. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i13/6867
Biria, R., & Karimi, Z. (2015). The effects of pre-task planning on the writing fluency of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(2), 357–365. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0602.16
Choi, L. J., Kim, R., & Chung, S. J. (2025). Integrating chatbot technology in language teacher education: A TPACK-based analysis of pre-service teachers’ professional development. Language Learning & Technology, 29(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/73621
Cohen, A. D., & Brooks-Carson, A. (2001). Research on direct vs. translated writing: Students’ strategies and their results. The Modern Language Journal, 85(2), 169–188.
Daba, D., Teshome, Z., & Bekele, E. (2022). The status, challenges and prospects of communicative language teaching in East Wollega Zone, Ethiopia. Journal of Science, Technology and Arts Research, 11(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.20372/star.v11i1.05
Deng, Y., & Sitthitikul, P. (2024). The effects of the guided dialogic peer feedback-based writing instruction on Chinese EFL students’ writing performance in an integrated blended learning environment. rEFLections, 32(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v32i1.277804
Knoch, U., Rouhshad, A., & Storch, N. (2014). Does the writing of undergraduate ESL students develop after one year of study in an English-medium university? Assessing Writing, 21, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2014.01.001
Li, Y. (2023). The effect of online collaborative writing instruction on enhancing writing performance, writing motivation, and writing self-efficacy of Chinese EFL learners. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1165221. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1165221
Liao, F.-Y. (2018). Prospective ESL/EFL teachers’ perceptions towards writing poetry in a second language: Difficulty, value, emotion, and attitude. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.460583
Liu, J., Sihes, A. J. B., & Lu, Y. (2025). How do generative artificial intelligence tools and large language models (LLMs) influence language learners’ critical thinking in EFL education? A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 12, Article 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00406-0
Liu, P., Zhang, Y., & Liu, D. (2022). Flow experience in foreign language writing: Its effect on students’ writing process and writing performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 952044. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.952044
Mueller-Lyaskovets, T., & Horner, O. (2021). Integrating formative assessment with foreign language (English) process writing instruction: Lessons from two college writing and reading classes in Germany. Journal of Academic Writing, 11(1), 62–79. https://doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v11i1.499
Rafiqa, R., Pabbajah, M. T. H., Asfihana, R., Naazaruddin, R., & Latifah, L. (2023). The effect of paraphrasing on EFL students’ writing at Indonesian higher education. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 26(1), 335–345. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v26i1.5683
Reynolds, J. A., Cai, V., Choi, J., Faller, S., Hu, M., Kozhumam, A., Schwartzman, J., & Vohra, A. (2020). Teaching during a pandemic: Using high-impact writing assignments to balance rigor, engagement, flexibility, and workload. Ecology and Evolution, 10(22). https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6776
Wang, L., & Zhan, F. (2023). Elaborating teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge from static and dynamic perspectives. Creative Education, 14(11), 2301–2312. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2023.1411145
Wu, Y.-T., & Wang, A. Y. (2015). Technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge in teaching English as a foreign language: Representation of primary teachers of English in Taiwan. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-015-0240-7
Yacoub, M. (2021). “Yay! I didn’t know that I was a poet:” The efficacy of writing poetry in ESL classes from a translingual approach. Magellan Journal of English Language and Literature Teaching, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.47340/mjellt.v2i3.3
Zhang, S. (2025). Exploring challenges and opportunities in the AI-driven professional development of higher education faculty. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 113, 22–29.
Zhang, Y. (2022). Incorporating peer response with teacher feedback in teaching writing to EFL learners: A literature review. English Language Teaching, 15(3), 48–53. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v15n3p48
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Evi Safitri Yulandari, Mul Muliadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities “tacitly or explicitly“ of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
- Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1.jpg)
