Oral Presentations as Catalysts for Critical Thinking: Indonesian EFL Students’ Perceptions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/jo-elt.v12i2.16823Keywords:
Critical thinking, EFL, Oral presentations, Phenomenological research, Public speakingAbstract
Critical thinking is a core competency in higher education, especially in EFL contexts where students must engage both linguistically and cognitively. This study investigates how oral presentations function as catalysts for critical thinking among Indonesian EFL undergraduates. Guided by an interpretive phenomenological approach, data were collected from 13 English education majors through reflective journals and semi-structured interviews and analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s thematic framework. One salient finding shows that students strengthened analytical reasoning and reflective judgment through both individual and collaborative presentation practices. Four themes emerged: presentations triggered analytical reasoning, fostered reflective learning, enhanced confidence, and revealed contrasts between individual and group tasks. These findings illustrate that oral presentations provided authentic opportunities for students to analyze information, evaluate arguments, and engage in collaborative reasoning. The study thus offers empirical evidence that classroom presentations can foster sustained cognitive engagement when accompanied by structured reflection. The study demonstrates that oral presentation tasks can effectively promote students’ intellectual engagement, and it contributes to EFL pedagogy by underscoring the role of reflection, scaffolding, and balanced task design in enhancing critical thinking within oral presentation courses. It suggests that incorporating structured reflection and guided feedback into public speaking classes can strengthen both linguistic performance and cognitive growth.
References
Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Waddington, D. I., Wade, C. A., & Persson, T. J. (2015). Strategies for teaching students to think critically: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(2), 275–314. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314551063
Al-Issa, A. S. M., & Al-Qubtan, R. (2010). Taking the floor: Oral presentations in EFL classrooms. TESOL Journal, 1(2), 227–246. https://doi.org/10.5054/TJ.2010.220425
Al-khresheh, M. H. (2024). The role of presentation-based activities in enhancing speaking proficiency among Saudi EFL students: A quasi-experimental study. Acta Psychologica, 243, 104159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104159
Ati, A., & Parmawati, A. (2022). The use of oral presentation in teaching English to improve students speaking skill. Project (Professional Journal of English Education), 5(2), 300–305. https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v5i2.p300-305
Bankole-Minaflinou, E. (2019). Promoting critical thinking skills in EFL university students in Benin. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 8(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.23.2019.81.1.13
Berjano, E., Sales-Nebot, L., & Lozano-Nieto, A. (2013). Improving professionalism in the engineering curriculum through a novel use of oral presentations. European Journal of Engineering Education, 38(2), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2012.745829
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.
Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2015). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Cahyadi, M., Suriani, A., & Nisa, S. (2024). Membangun kemampuan public speaking dalam meningkatkan kepercayaan diri siswa sekolah dasar. Asian Journal of Early Childhood and Elementary Education, 2(3), 260–267. https://doi.org/10.58578/ajecee.v2i3.3070
Dumlao, R. P. (2020). Language socialization through an oral academic presentation in an EFL environment: A qualitative study. The Qualitative Report, 25(2), 416–440. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4213
Ennis, R. H. (1996). Critical thinking. Prentice Hall.
Facione, P. A. (2000). The disposition toward critical thinking: Its character, measurement, and relationship to critical thinking skill. Informal Logic, 20(1), 61–84. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v20i1.2254
Greene, J. A., & Yu, S. B. (2016). Educating critical thinkers: The role of epistemic cognition. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215622223
Haile, K. W., Olamo, T. G., & Yemiru, M. A. (2024). Utilizing communication strategies to enhance reflective learning in Ethiopian EFL classrooms. Heliyon, 10(3), e32585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32585
Hysaj, A., & Suleymanova, S. (2020). The analysis of developing the application of critical thinking in oral and written discussions: The case of Emirati students in the United Arab Emirates. IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering, 819–824. https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE48869.2020.9368472
Iglesias Pérez, M. C., Vidal-Puga, J., & Pino Juste, M. R. (2020). The role of self and peer assessment in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 47(3), 683–692. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1783526
Irianti, L., Faridi, A., Pratama, H., & Suwandi. (2024). Flipped classroom and critical thinking on public speaking class. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2315815
Kaur, K., & Ali, A. M. (2017). Exploring the genre of academic oral presentations: A critical review. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(1), 152–162. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.1p.152
Kuhn, D. (2019). Critical thinking as discourse. Human Development, 62(3), 146–164. https://doi.org/10.1159/000500171
Lata, P., Dhayani, U., & Luhach, S. (2014). Inculcating critical thinking among engineering graduates through public speaking course. ELT Research Journal, 2(4), 156–166. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/eltrj/issue/5480/74418
Lau, J. Y. F. (2024). Revisiting the origin of critical thinking. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 56(7), 724–733. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2024.2320199
Loyens, S. M. M., van Meerten, J. E., Schaap, L., & Wijnia, L. (2023). Situating higher-order, critical, and critical-analytic thinking in problem- and project-based learning environments: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09757-x
Luk, J., & Lin, A. M. Y. (2015). Voices without words: Doing critical literate talk in English as a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 49(1), 67–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.161
Mak, S. H. (2021). Analysing the needs of EFL/ESL learners in developing academic presentation competence. RELC Journal, 52(3), 379–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688219879514
Nurhayati, S. (2023). Analysis of vocabulary mastery and critical thinking skills as preparation for scientific presentations. Borneo Educational Journal (Borju), 5(2), 375–388. https://doi.org/10.24903/bej.v5i2.1437
Ramos, I. D. D. (2020). Public speaking preparation stage: Critical thinking and organization skills in South Korea. International Research in Education, 8(2), 77–96. https://doi.org/10.5296/ire.v8i2.17541
Rieger, E., Aggarwal, P., & Cameron, C. (2017). Scientific elevator speeches: A communication and critical thinking tool. Medical Education, 51(5), 559. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13321
Ruano‐Borbalan, J. (2023). Understanding and fostering the development of critical thinking education and competences. European Journal of Education, 58(3), 347–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12572
Shaw, A., Liu, O. L., Gu, L., Kardonova, E., Chirikov, I., Li, G., Hu, S., Yu, N., Ma, L., Guo, F., Su, Q., Shi, J., Shi, H., & Loyalka, P. (2020). Thinking critically about critical thinking: Validating the Russian HEIghten® critical thinking assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 45(9), 1933–1948. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1672640
Shen, X., & Teng, M. F. (2024). Three-wave cross-lagged model on the correlations between critical thinking skills, self-directed learning competency and AI-assisted writing. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 52, 101524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101524
Sieroka, N., Otto, V. I., & Folkers, G. (2018). Guest editorial: Critical thinking in education and research: Why and how? Angewandte Chemie, 57(51), 16574–16575. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201810397
Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2022). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Song, X., Razali, A. B., Sulaiman, T., & Jeyaraj, J. J. (2024). Impact of project-based learning on critical thinking skills and language skills in EFL context: A review of literature. World Journal of English Language, 14(5), 402–412. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n5p402
Urcos, C. N. C., Urcos, W. H. C., López, D. T., Pérez, L. B. P., Palomino, E. M. V., & Navarro, E. R. (2024). Learning experiences and the development of critical thinking in students of early childhood education at public universities. Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture, 8(1), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.70082/esiculture.vi.962
Yang, Y. T. C., & Gamble, J. H. (2013). Effective and practical critical thinking-enhanced EFL instruction. ELT Journal, 67(4), 398–412. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct038
Yin, S., Guo, K. Y., & Li, D. (2024). To assign a topic or not: Examining critical thinking in English as a foreign language speaking. RELC Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231222651
Yu, B., & Zadorozhnyy, A. (2022). Developing students’ linguistic and digital literacy skills through the use of multimedia presentations. ReCALL, 34(1), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344021000136
Wagner, P. E. (2019). Reviving thinking in a speaking course: A critical-thinking model for public speaking. Communication Teacher, 33(2), 158–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2018.1536795
Zhang, M., & Kim, N. Y. (2021). The effects of an English public speaking course on critical thinking dispositions of Chinese EFL university students. Studies in English Education, 26(4), 559–596. https://doi.org/10.22275/see.26.4.03
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hamzah Puadi Ilyas, Istaryatiningtias Istaryatiningtias
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities “tacitly or explicitly“ of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
- Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1.jpg)
