Promoting Multiple Representation in the TPACK Framework to Clarify the Acid-Base Species Problem-Solving

Authors

  • Qonita Mu'minah Chemistry Education Study Program, Mathematics and Science Education Faculty, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi No. 229, Bandung, 40154, Indonesia
  • Sri Mulyani Chemistry Education Study Program, Mathematics and Science Education Faculty, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi No. 229, Bandung, 40154, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v14i2.20178

Keywords:

Misleading Problem-Solving, Acid-Base Species Determination, Appropriate Learning Technology, Pedagogical Strategy

Abstract

Oversimplifying chemical concepts to explain the invisible part is frequent in the concept of acid-base species determination. During school time, teachers frequently drill students to use straightforward formulas to prevent time-consuming calculations in calculating pH values. This attitude contributes to misleading problem-solving even among twenty-three preservice teachers at one of the educational universities in West Java, Indonesia. Therefore, the lecturer developed a learning strategy that uses the TPACK framework and multiple representations to clarify the misleading and prepare chemistry preservice teachers to overcome similar challenges in real-world situations. The multiple representations and misconceptions analysis was assigned to determine a suitable pedagogical strategy and identify appropriate technology. Quantitative assessments were used to measure changes in problem-solving approaches. It discovers that they have an excellent understanding of solving the acid-base problems using the conceptual approach, with increasing: 13.0% to 60.9% and 43.4% to 56.5%.  However, some mathematical issues appear if the conditions are related to more complex acid-base scenarios, such as those related to buffer and hydrolysis regions. It is shown that the percentage of the conceptual approach usage decreases or remains constant: 69.6% to 45.7% and 43.4%, respectively. This shows that the symbolic level in chemistry learning is also linked to mathematical skills. As a consequence, chemistry preservice teachers must have a strong mathematical basic skills to solve problems correctly. Further study is also recommended in other chemistry subjects to get a broader view.

References

Abareta, J. O., & Prudente, M. S. (2025). Digital Technology Tools (DTT) in science teaching: Teachers’ perceptions of usage and effectiveness. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(1), 443–463. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.1.22

Ardyansyah, A., & Rahayu, S. (2024). Technology-enhanced learning influence on chemical literacy: A systematic review. Ecletica Quimica, 49, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.26850/1678-4618.eq.v49.2024.e1534

Awwalin, U. B., & Nugroho, D. E. (2024). Identifikasi miskonsepsi siswa menggunakan tes diagnostik five-tier pada materi larutan penyangga. Science Education and Development Journal Archives, 2(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.59923/sendja.v2i1.79

Bhandurge, P., & Suryawanshi, S. S. (2024). Question paper design in line with outcome-based education policy. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, 58(4), 1201-s1210. https://doi.org/10.5530/ijper.58.4s.117

Chang, Raymond., & Overby, Jason. (2011). General chemistry : The essential concepts (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Duc Nguyen, M., Vinh Nguyen, Q., Kien Nguyen, H., & Van Giang Cao, T. (2026). Exploring pathways for integrating Augmented Reality in chemistry teaching: Mediating TPACK framework for effective instruction. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 25(13), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.28945/5741

González, J. R. G., & Bravo, G. J. V. (2023). TPACK in in-service secondary education teachers: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 12(1), 282–296. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3198

Irawan, N. Z. P., Anwar*, S., & Munawaroh, H. S. H. (2024). Designing Chemistry Teaching Materials and Worksheets to Promote Students’ Creative Thinking Skills: A Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal IPA & Pembelajaran IPA, 8(4), 350–366. https://doi.org/10.24815/jipi.v8i4.41761

Kartini, K. S., Putra, I. N. T. A., Yusa, I. M. M., & Adnyana, I. N. W. (2024). Tridatu responsive inquiry adaptive navigation to enhance acid-base titration understanding in Bali schools. Jurnal Edutech Undiksha, 12(2), 281–290. https://doi.org/10.23887/jeu.v12i2.88273

Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Akcaoglu, M., & Rosenberg, J. M. (2013). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework for teachers and teacher educators. In ICT Integrated Teacher Education: A Resource Book. http://tpack.org

Pahriah, Gde Wawan Sudatha, I., Kadek Suartama, I., & Hery Santosa, M. (2025). Students’ misconceptions in chemistry learning: A systematic literature review from 2015 to 2025. Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia, 13(3), 510–529. https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v13i3.15805

Permatasari, M. B., Rahayu, S., & Dasna, I. W. (2022). Chemistry learning using multiple representations: A systematic literature review. Journal of Science Learning, 5(2), 334–341. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v5i2.42656

Pratomo, H., Fitriyana, N., Wiyarsi, A., & Marfuatun. (2025). Mapping chemistry learning difficulties of secondary school students: A cross-grade study. Journal of Education and Learning, 19(2), 909–920. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v19i2.21826

Rahayu, S., Asih, E. J. V. T., Ardyansyah, A., & Alam, M. D. (2025). Enhancing high school students’ conceptual understanding of acid-base chemistry through Augmented Reality modules. Educación Química, 36(4), 142–156. https://doi.org/10.22201/fq.18708404e.2025.4.90694

Salame, I. I., Montero, A., & Eschweiler, D. (2022). Examining some of the Students’ challenges and alternative conceptions in learning about acid-base titrations. IJCER (International Journal of Chemistry Education Research), 6(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.20885/ijcer.vol6.iss1.art1

Sheppard, K. (2006). High school students’ understanding of titrations and related acid-base phenomena. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 1(7), 32–45.

Tadesse, H. N. (2025). The role of virtual laboratories in advancing student learning on acid–base equilibrium. Chemistry Teacher International, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2025-0060

Tania, A. P., & Sukarmin, S. (2025). Augmented reality-based virtual laboratory application as chemistry learning media for acid-base titration material. Jurnal Eduscience, 12(5), 1354–1366. https://doi.org/10.36987/jes.v12i5.7641

Treagust, D. F., Chittleborough, G., & Mamiala, T. L. (2003). The role of submicroscopic and symbolic representations in chemical explanations. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1353–1368. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000070306

Tyas, R. A., Wilujeng, I., Rosana, D., & Jumadi. (2025). An examination of preservice science teachers pedagogical content knowledge: Development and trends. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 8(9), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2025279

Widarti, H. R., Permanasari, A., & Mulyani, S. (2017). Students’ misconceptions on titration. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 812(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012016

Published

2026-05-05

How to Cite

Mu’minah, Q., & Mulyani, S. (2026). Promoting Multiple Representation in the TPACK Framework to Clarify the Acid-Base Species Problem-Solving. Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v14i2.20178

Issue

Section

Articles