Cognitive and Emotional Engagement in Stoichiometry Learning: A Correlational Study

Authors

  • Waviza Study Program of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Tanjungpura University, Pontianak, Indonesia
  • Erlina Study Program of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Tanjungpura University, Pontianak, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4620-1281
  • Eni Mayasari Study Program of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Tanjungpura University, Pontianak, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5496-2864

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v14i2.19717

Keywords:

Cognitive Engagement, Emotional Engagement, Correlation, Stoichiometry

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to measure the strength of the relationship between students’ cognitive and emotional engagement in stoichiometry learning. This research employed a descriptive quantitative approach, including descriptive analysis and correlational analysis. The participants consisted of 70 eleventh-grade students enrolled in the science-track chemistry course, drawn from two classes: Grade XI Chemistry 1 and Grade XI Chemistry 2. Data were collected using a four-point Likert-scale questionnaire measuring cognitive and emotional engagement, as well as through observations, semi-structured interviews, and documentation. The results showed that: (1) students’ cognitive engagement was categorized as very high (13%), high (34%), low (43%), and very low (10%); (2) students’ emotional engagement was categorized as very high (20%), high (16%), low (53%), and very low (11%); (3) the correlation test between cognitive and emotional engagement was significant (0.000 < 0.05), indicating a positive relationship; and (4) the strength of the relationship between cognitive and emotional engagement, as indicated by Spearman’s rho, was 0.447, which represents a moderate level of correlation. Therefor, higher cognitive engagement is associated with higher emotional engagement, and vice versa.

References

Abdurrahman. (2022). Media Pembelajaran Asik Dan Menyenangkan Untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Mahasiswa Dalam Mata Kuliah Bahasa Indonesia Mega. Students’Difficulties At Elementary School In Increasing Literacy Ability., 5(2), 1014-1026.

Damayanti, Y. D., & Putri, R. A. (2025). Cognitive Load Reduction Strategy In Learning Stoichiometry For 3t Students : An Approach To Overcoming Cognitive Load In Chemistry Numeration. International Journal Of Active Learning, 10(1), 18–23.

Djemari, M. (2008). Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen Tes Dan Nontes.

Emda, A. (2017). Laboratorium Sebagai Sarana Pembelajaran Kimia Dalam Meningkatkan Pengetahuan Dan Ketrampilan Kerja Ilmiah. Lantanida Journal, 5(1), 83.

Fikrie, & Ariani, L. (2021). Keterlibatan Siswa (Student Engagement) Di Sekolah Sebagai Salah Satu Upaya Peningkatan Keberhasilan Siswa Di Sekolah. Ulul Albab: Majalah Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram, 28(2), 112–125.

Fitriani, A. R., Rahmawati, A., & Lathifa, U. (2022). Phenomenology Of Conceptual Understanding Ability , Representation , And Student Algorithm On Stoichiometry Materials 1 ) SMAIT Alam Harapan Ummat Purbalingga , Indonesia 2 ) Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang , Indonesia 3 ) SMP Negeri 1 Undaan. Journal Of Educational Chemistry, 4(1), 9–18. Https://Doi.Org/10.21580/Jec.2022.4.1.9744

Fredricks, J. A., Filsecker, M., & Lawson, M. A. (2016). Student Engagement, Context, And Adjustment: Addressing Definitional, Measurement, And Methodological Issues. Learning And Instruction, 43, 1–4.

Hemayanti, K. L., Muderawan, I. W., & Selamat, I. N. (2020). Analisis Minat Belajar Siswa Kelas Xi Mia Pada Mata Pelajaran Kimia. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 4(1), 20–25.

Idris, I. H., Syamsurizal, S., & Muhammad, D. (2018). Peningkatan Cognitive Engagement Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran Dengan Pendekatan POE (Predict-Observe-Explain) Dan Multimedia Interaktif Yang Dikembangkan Sendiri. Edu-Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 7(2), 21–31.

Inwanti, S. N., & Setiawan, & D. (2025). Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 26(April), 212–226.

Irwandi, D., Sholihat, R. N., & Nuraida, F. (2024). Hubungan Antara Self-Regulated Learning Dengan Prokrastinasi Akademik Siswa Pada Pelajaran. Jurnal Tahsinia, 5(5), 754–767.

Jamaluddin, A. Bin, Bahri, A., Pratiwi, A. C., & Lembang, A. M. (2025). Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 26(January), 36–50.

Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing Student Engagement In Higher Education. Studies In Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505

Komperda, R., Pentecost, T. C., & Barbera, J. (2018). Moving Beyond Alpha : A Primer On Alternative Sources Of Single-Administration Reliability Evidence For Quantitative Chemistry Education Research. Journal Of Chemical Education, 95(9), 1477–1491. Https://Doi.Org/10.1021/Acs.Jchemed.8b00220.This

Lumbantoruan, D. L., Yulita, I., & Umara, Y. (2025). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa Sma Dalam Memahami Materi Stoikiometri Dan Upaya Remediasi Yang Efektif (Doctoral Dissertation, Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji).

Manoppo, A. J. (2020). Keterlibatan Kognitif Pada Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa. Nutrix Journal, 4(2), 51–59.

Mantau, B. A. K., & Talango, S. R. (2023). Pengintegrasian Keterampilan Abad 21 Dalam Proses Pembelajaran (Literature Review). Irfani (E-Journal), 19(1), 86-107.

Marganingtyas, A., Fadhiilah, U., & Nurlaili, M. A. M. (2025). Pengaruh Keterlibatan Siswa, Motivasi Belajar Siswa Dan Metode Mengajar Guru Terhadap Hasil Belajar Kimia Siswa. Integrative Perspectives Of Social And Science Journal, 2(3), 3446–3462.

Marlan, Syaiful, & Anwar. (2020). Penggunaan Strategi Pembelajaran Aktif Untuk Meningkatkan Efektivitas Pembelajaran. Urnal Manajer Pendidikan, 15(April), 41–50.

Naibert, N., & Barbera, J. (2022). Development And Evaluation Of A Survey To Measure Student Engagement At The Activity Level In General Chemistry. Journal Of Chemical Education, 99(3), 1410–1419. Https://Doi.Org/10.1021/Acs.Jchemed.1c01051

Nakamura, S., Phung, L., & Reinders, H. (2021). The Effect Of Learner Choice On L2 Task Engagement. Studies In Second Language Acquisition, 43(2), 1–14. Https://Doi.Org/10.1017/S027226312000042X

Parent, G. A. G. A., Gunawan, A., & Hermawati, E. (2023). Hubungan Kecerdasan Emosional Dengan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Tematik. BADA’A: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 5(2), 374–385. Https://Doi.Org/10.37216/Badaa.V5i2.1087

Pietarinen, J., Soini, T., & Pyha, K. (2014). Students ’ Emotional And Cognitive Engagement As The Determinants Of Well-Being And Achievement In School. International Journal Of Educational Research, 67, 40–51. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Ijer.2014.05.001

Pranatawijaya, V. H., & Priskila, R. (2019). Penerapan Skala Likert Dan Skala Dikotomi Pada Kuesioner Online. Jurnal Sains Dan Informatika, 5(November), 128–137. Https://Doi.Org/10.34128/Jsi.V5i2.185

Roflin, E., Rohana., & Riana, F. (2022). Analisis Korelasi Dan Regresi. Penerbit NEM.

Romsi, A., Widodo, J. P., & Slamet, J. (2024). Empowering Slow Learners : Gamification ’ S Impact On Students ’ Engagement And Academic Performance In An LMS For Undergraduate Students. International Journal Of Information And Education Technology, 14(2), 193–203. Https://Doi.Org/10.18178/Ijiet.2024.14.2.2040

Safaa Y, E.-M., Francis, J. M., & Hartig, A. J. (2024). Pendidikan Kimia Penelitian Dan Praktik. 799–814.

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D. ALFABETA.

Suryani, A. I., Syahribulan, K., & Mursalam, M. (2019). Pengaruh Penggunaan Metode Mind Mapping Terhadap Hasil Belajar Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Murid Kelas V SDN No . 166 Inpres Bontorita Kabupaten Takalar. (JKPD) Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dasar, 4(166).

Tu, Y., Wang, Q., & Huang, C. (2025). Facilitating Students ’ Emotional Engagement In Synchronous Online Learning : A Systematic Literature Review. The International Review Of Research In Open And Distributed Learning, 26(1), 261–282.

Upadhyay, M. P. (2024). Exploring Public Secondary Students ’ Classroom Participation In Communicative Language Teaching In Gauriganga Nepal 1. Contemporary Research: An Interdisciplinary Academic Journal, 7(2), 138–152.

Waruwu, M., Natijatul, S., Utami, P. R., & Yanti, E. (2025). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif : Konsep , Jenis , Tahapan Dan Kelebihan. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 10(1), 917–932.

Yuliati, Y. (2017). Literasi Sains Dalam Pembelajaran IPA. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 3(2), 21–28.

Yunita, S., Rohiat, S., & Amir, H. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mata Pelajaran Kimia Pada Siswa Kelas XI IPA SMAN 1 KEPAHIANG. Alotrop, 2(1), 33–38.

Zulaika, A., Erlina, E., & Sahputra, R. (2024). Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN MIPA, 14(4), 1078–1090.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Waviza, Erlina, & Mayasari, E. (2026). Cognitive and Emotional Engagement in Stoichiometry Learning: A Correlational Study. Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia, 14(2), 237–244. https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v14i2.19717

Issue

Section

Articles