CHEMLIT: Development and Feasibility of a Sensor-Based Chemistry Practicum Tool for Electrolyte Solutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v14i2.19512Keywords:
CHEMLIT, Research and Development, ADDIE, Chemical Representations, Senior High SchoolAbstract
Chemistry learning requires the integration of macroscopic, submicroscopic, and symbolic representations. However, limited availability of practicum tools in senior high schools often hinders students’ comprehensive understanding of chemical concepts, particularly in electrolyte and nonelectrolyte solutions. This study aimed to develop and implement CHEMLIT, a sensor-based chemistry practicum tool designed to support learning on solution electrical conductivity. The study employed a Research and Development (R&D) approach using the ADDIE model, consisting of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation stages. Needs analysis was conducted through classroom observations and teacher interviews, followed by prototype design, assembly, calibration, and functional testing to ensure stability and safety. The implementation involved two senior high schools in the Minahasa region, with chemistry teachers serving as reviewers and students as trial users. Feasibility was evaluated by media experts, material experts, teachers, and students using five-point Likert-scale questionnaires, and the data were analyzed by converting scores into percentage-based feasibility criteria. Product feasibility was evaluated through validation by media experts, subject matter experts, chemistry teachers, and students using questionnaire instruments. The validation results indicated a very high level of feasibility, with scores of 91.7% from media experts, 96% from material experts, 92% from teachers, and student responses exceeding 93.99%, categorized as very good. These findings indicate that CHEMLIT meets technical, visual, and content feasibility standards and can serve as an alternative practicum tool for teaching electrolyte and non-electrolyte solutions, especially in schools with limited laboratory facilities. Its novelty lies in a portable sensor-based design that integrates quantitative conductivity measurement into conventional testing without complex digital systems.
References
Agustiana, M., Fathiah, Islamadina, I., & Nurrizqa. (2025). Pengembangan Flipbook Berbasis Augmented Reality (AR) pada Mata Pelajaran IPAS Materi Sistem Gerak Manusia di MIN 20 Aceh Besar. Jurnal Elektronika dan Teknologi Informasi, 6(2):1-2. https://doi.org/10.5201/jet.v6i2.539
Arikunto, S. (2021). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Edisi 3 (p. 269). Bumi Aksara.
Arsyad, A. 2017. Media Pembelajaran (p. 219-220). Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Assa, C. R. H., & Gugule, S. (2025). Pengaruh Media Pembelajaran Web Wordwall Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Termokimia di SMA Kosgoro Tomohon. Oxygenius : Journal of Chemistry Education, 7(1):24-30. https://doi.org/10.37033/ojce.v7i1.735
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. New York: Springer.
Ferreira, J. E. V., & Lawrie, G. A. (2019). Profiling the combinations of multiple representations used in large-class teaching: pathways to inclusive practices. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(4), 902–923. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00001A
Helsy, I., & Andriyani, L. (2017). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Pada Materi Kesetimbangan Kimia Berorientasi Multipel Representasi Kimia. JTK (Jurnal Tadris Kimiya), 2(1):104–108. https://doi.org/10.15575/jta.v2i1.1365
Ishak, C., Musa, W. J. A., Kunusa, W. R., Isa, I., & Rumape, O. (2022). Deskripsi Pemahaman Konsep Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal-Soal Larutan Elektrolit Dan Non-Elektrolit Berbasis Representasi Makroskopik, Submikroskopik Dan Simbolik. Jambura Journal of Educational Chemistry, 4(2):127–134. https://doi.org/10.34312/jjec.v4i2.13256
Kapici, H. O. (2023). From symbolic representation to submicroscopic one: Preservicescience teachers’ struggle with chemical representation levels in chemistry. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 9(1), 134-147. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.3122
Kurniawan, A., et al. (2025). Bridging the science practices gap: Analyzing laboratory activities in high school chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education Research, 12(3), 112-130. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00744
Latipah, J., Jamilah, S. N., Sari, S. T., & Almubarak. (2021). Analysis Of Student’s Mental Model Through Representation Chemistry Textbooks Based On Augmented Reality. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1760(1):1-6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1760/1/012050
Moju, M. (2025). Tackling the challenge of chemical representations through sensemaking practices in chemistry education. Discover Education, https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00703-3
Mutakinati, L., Nusantara, T., & Susanto, H. (2025). Investigating the factors impeding senior high school chemistry teachers' practical work organisation. European Journal of Science Education, 5(1), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejsee/16902
Olympiou, G., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2021). Sensor-based technologies in science education: A systematic review. International Journal of Science Education, 43(5):687-710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10086-5
Permatasari, M. B., Rahayu, S., & Dasna, I. W. (2022). Chemistry learning using multiple representations: A systematic literature review. Journal of Science Learning, 5(2), 334–341. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v5i2.42656
Rahmanian, F., Vogler, M., Wölke, C., Yan, P., Fuchs, S., Winter, M., Cekic-Laskovic, I., & Stein, H. S. (2023). Conductivity experiments for electrolyte formulations and their automated analysis. Scientific Data, 10, Article 43. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-01936-3
Ramadhani, F., Satria, B., Imron, I., Junirianto, E., & Maria, E. (2024). Development Of An Augmented Reality Application For Chemistry Molecule Learning In Inclusive Schools. Sebatik, 28(2):438-443. https://doi.org/10.46984/sebatik.v28i2.2480
Rizqi Hidayah Adryansyah, M., Aprilia Quiroz, P., Ilham Zuhdi, M., & Sutabri, T. (2023). Perancangan Multimedia Teknologi Virtual Reality Dan Augmented Reality Sebagai Media Pameran Digital. In Technologia, 14(3):214-220. https://doi.org/10.31602/tji.v14i3.11518
Safitri, N. C., Nursaadah, E., & Wijayanti, I. E. (2019). Analisis multipel representasi kimia siswa pada konsep laju reaksi. EduChemia (Jurnal Kimia Dan Pendidikan), 4(1):1-12. https://doi.org/10.30870/educhemia.v4i1.5023
Salame, I. I., & Thompson, A. (2020). Students’ Views on Strategic Note-taking and its Impact on Performance, Achievement, and Learning. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2):1-16. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1321a
Santi, A. N. I., & Rahayu, M. (2022). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Materi Larutan Elektrolit Dan Non Elektrolit Menggunakan Instrumen Multirepresentasi Four-Tier Diagnostic Test Berbasis Piktorial. UNESA Journal of Chemical Education, 11(3):210–219. https://doi.org/10.26740/ujced.v11n3.p210-219
Sardjono. (2024). Challenges and alternative solutions for implementing chemistry practicums in public high schools. Tadris Kimiya, 7(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.15575/jtk.v9i2.36302
Satria, A., & Sutabri, T. (2025). Pengembangan Pembelajaran Virtual Reality Berbasis Metaverse Menggunakan Metode ADDIE. Router: Jurnal Teknik Informatika dan Terapan, 3(2): 01-09. https://doi.org/10.62951/router.v3i2.409
Seery, M. K. (2020). Establishing the laboratory as the place to learn how to do chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(6), 1511-1514. http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1876-9339
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (p. 153). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Talanquer, V. (2022). The complexity of reasoning about and with chemical representations. JACS Au, 2(12), 2658–2669. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.2c00498
Tima, M. T., & Sutrisno, H. (2018). Influence of Problem Solving Based on Multiple Representations Model on Teaching and Learning of Chemistry on Student Academic Self-Efficacy and Students’s Cognitive Achievement. American Journal of Educational Research, 6(7), 887-892. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-6-7-1
Trivic, D. D., & . Milanovic, V. D. (2018). The macroscopic, cubmicroscopic and symbolic level in explanation of a chemical reaction provided by thirteen-year olds. Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society, 83(0):1-16. https://doi.org/10.2298/JSC171220055T
Widarti, H. R., Marfu’ah, S., & Parlan. (2019). The Effects of Using Multiple Representations on Prospective Teachers’ Conceptual Understanding of Intermolecular Forces. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1227(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1227/1/012006.
Wildan, W., Supriadi, Hadisaputra, S., Muti’ah, M., Siahaan, J., & Ariani, S. (2023). Melatih Model Mental Kimia Siswa Sman 1 Sambelia Menggunakan Media Augmented Reality. Jurnal Pengabdian Inovasi Masyarakat Indonesia, 2(1):31–35. https://dx.doi.org/10.29303/jpimi.v2i1.2246
Ye, J., Lu, S., & Bi, H. (2019). The effects of microcomputer-based laboratories on students’ macro, micro, and symbolic representations when learning about net ionic reactions. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(1), 288–301. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RP00165K
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lorry Enjlina Br Surbakti, Maria Murniyanti Parhusip, Natasya Patulak, Septiany Ch. Palilingan, Stefan Marco Rumengan, Jakub Saddam Akbar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia uses a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data: Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default) Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

