CHEMLIT: Development and Feasibility of a Sensor-Based Chemistry Practicum Tool for Electrolyte Solutions

Authors

  • Lorry Enjlina Br Surbakti Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics, Natural Sciences, and Earth Sciences, Manado State University, Jl. Kampus Unima, Tondano Selatan, Minahasa, North Sulawesi, Indonesia 95618
  • Maria Murniyanti Parhusip Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics, Natural Sciences, and Earth Sciences, Manado State University, Jl. Kampus Unima, Tondano Selatan, Minahasa, North Sulawesi, Indonesia 95618
  • Natasya Patulak Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics, Natural Sciences, and Earth Sciences, Manado State University, Jl. Kampus Unima, Tondano Selatan, Minahasa, North Sulawesi, Indonesia 95618
  • Septiany Ch. Palilingan Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics, Natural Sciences, and Earth Sciences, Manado State University, Jl. Kampus Unima, Tondano Selatan, Minahasa, North Sulawesi, Indonesia 95618
  • Stefan Marco Rumengan Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics, Natural Sciences, and Earth Sciences, Manado State University, Jl. Kampus Unima, Tondano Selatan, Minahasa, North Sulawesi, Indonesia 95618
  • Jakub Saddam Akbar Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics, Natural Sciences, and Earth Sciences, Manado State University, Jl. Kampus Unima, Tondano Selatan, Minahasa, North Sulawesi, Indonesia 95618

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v14i2.19512

Keywords:

CHEMLIT, Research and Development, ADDIE, Chemical Representations, Senior High School

Abstract

Chemistry learning requires the integration of macroscopic, submicroscopic, and symbolic representations. However, limited availability of practicum tools in senior high schools often hinders students’ comprehensive understanding of chemical concepts, particularly in electrolyte and nonelectrolyte solutions. This study aimed to develop and implement CHEMLIT, a sensor-based chemistry practicum tool designed to support learning on solution electrical conductivity. The study employed a Research and Development (R&D) approach using the ADDIE model, consisting of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation stages. Needs analysis was conducted through classroom observations and teacher interviews, followed by prototype design, assembly, calibration, and functional testing to ensure stability and safety. The implementation involved two senior high schools in the Minahasa region, with chemistry teachers serving as reviewers and students as trial users. Feasibility was evaluated by media experts, material experts, teachers, and students using five-point Likert-scale questionnaires, and the data were analyzed by converting scores into percentage-based feasibility criteria. Product feasibility was evaluated through validation by media experts, subject matter experts, chemistry teachers, and students using questionnaire instruments. The validation results indicated a very high level of feasibility, with scores of 91.7% from media experts, 96% from material experts, 92% from teachers, and student responses exceeding 93.99%, categorized as very good. These findings indicate that CHEMLIT meets technical, visual, and content feasibility standards and can serve as an alternative practicum tool for teaching electrolyte and non-electrolyte solutions, especially in schools with limited laboratory facilities. Its novelty lies in a portable sensor-based design that integrates quantitative conductivity measurement into conventional testing without complex digital systems.

References

Agustiana, M., Fathiah, Islamadina, I., & Nurrizqa. (2025). Pengembangan Flipbook Berbasis Augmented Reality (AR) pada Mata Pelajaran IPAS Materi Sistem Gerak Manusia di MIN 20 Aceh Besar. Jurnal Elektronika dan Teknologi Informasi, 6(2):1-2. https://doi.org/10.5201/jet.v6i2.539

Arikunto, S. (2021). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Edisi 3 (p. 269). Bumi Aksara.

Arsyad, A. 2017. Media Pembelajaran (p. 219-220). Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Assa, C. R. H., & Gugule, S. (2025). Pengaruh Media Pembelajaran Web Wordwall Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Termokimia di SMA Kosgoro Tomohon. Oxygenius : Journal of Chemistry Education, 7(1):24-30. https://doi.org/10.37033/ojce.v7i1.735

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. New York: Springer.

Ferreira, J. E. V., & Lawrie, G. A. (2019). Profiling the combinations of multiple representations used in large-class teaching: pathways to inclusive practices. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(4), 902–923. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00001A

Helsy, I., & Andriyani, L. (2017). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Pada Materi Kesetimbangan Kimia Berorientasi Multipel Representasi Kimia. JTK (Jurnal Tadris Kimiya), 2(1):104–108. https://doi.org/10.15575/jta.v2i1.1365

Ishak, C., Musa, W. J. A., Kunusa, W. R., Isa, I., & Rumape, O. (2022). Deskripsi Pemahaman Konsep Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal-Soal Larutan Elektrolit Dan Non-Elektrolit Berbasis Representasi Makroskopik, Submikroskopik Dan Simbolik. Jambura Journal of Educational Chemistry, 4(2):127–134. https://doi.org/10.34312/jjec.v4i2.13256

Kapici, H. O. (2023). From symbolic representation to submicroscopic one: Preservicescience teachers’ struggle with chemical representation levels in chemistry. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 9(1), 134-147. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.3122

Kurniawan, A., et al. (2025). Bridging the science practices gap: Analyzing laboratory activities in high school chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education Research, 12(3), 112-130. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00744

Latipah, J., Jamilah, S. N., Sari, S. T., & Almubarak. (2021). Analysis Of Student’s Mental Model Through Representation Chemistry Textbooks Based On Augmented Reality. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1760(1):1-6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1760/1/012050

Moju, M. (2025). Tackling the challenge of chemical representations through sensemaking practices in chemistry education. Discover Education, https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00703-3

Mutakinati, L., Nusantara, T., & Susanto, H. (2025). Investigating the factors impeding senior high school chemistry teachers' practical work organisation. European Journal of Science Education, 5(1), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejsee/16902

Olympiou, G., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2021). Sensor-based technologies in science education: A systematic review. International Journal of Science Education, 43(5):687-710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10086-5

Permatasari, M. B., Rahayu, S., & Dasna, I. W. (2022). Chemistry learning using multiple representations: A systematic literature review. Journal of Science Learning, 5(2), 334–341. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v5i2.42656

Rahmanian, F., Vogler, M., Wölke, C., Yan, P., Fuchs, S., Winter, M., Cekic-Laskovic, I., & Stein, H. S. (2023). Conductivity experiments for electrolyte formulations and their automated analysis. Scientific Data, 10, Article 43. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-01936-3

Ramadhani, F., Satria, B., Imron, I., Junirianto, E., & Maria, E. (2024). Development Of An Augmented Reality Application For Chemistry Molecule Learning In Inclusive Schools. Sebatik, 28(2):438-443. https://doi.org/10.46984/sebatik.v28i2.2480

Rizqi Hidayah Adryansyah, M., Aprilia Quiroz, P., Ilham Zuhdi, M., & Sutabri, T. (2023). Perancangan Multimedia Teknologi Virtual Reality Dan Augmented Reality Sebagai Media Pameran Digital. In Technologia, 14(3):214-220. https://doi.org/10.31602/tji.v14i3.11518

Safitri, N. C., Nursaadah, E., & Wijayanti, I. E. (2019). Analisis multipel representasi kimia siswa pada konsep laju reaksi. EduChemia (Jurnal Kimia Dan Pendidikan), 4(1):1-12. https://doi.org/10.30870/educhemia.v4i1.5023

Salame, I. I., & Thompson, A. (2020). Students’ Views on Strategic Note-taking and its Impact on Performance, Achievement, and Learning. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2):1-16. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1321a

Santi, A. N. I., & Rahayu, M. (2022). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Materi Larutan Elektrolit Dan Non Elektrolit Menggunakan Instrumen Multirepresentasi Four-Tier Diagnostic Test Berbasis Piktorial. UNESA Journal of Chemical Education, 11(3):210–219. https://doi.org/10.26740/ujced.v11n3.p210-219

Sardjono. (2024). Challenges and alternative solutions for implementing chemistry practicums in public high schools. Tadris Kimiya, 7(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.15575/jtk.v9i2.36302

Satria, A., & Sutabri, T. (2025). Pengembangan Pembelajaran Virtual Reality Berbasis Metaverse Menggunakan Metode ADDIE. Router: Jurnal Teknik Informatika dan Terapan, 3(2): 01-09. https://doi.org/10.62951/router.v3i2.409

Seery, M. K. (2020). Establishing the laboratory as the place to learn how to do chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(6), 1511-1514. http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1876-9339

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (p. 153). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Talanquer, V. (2022). The complexity of reasoning about and with chemical representations. JACS Au, 2(12), 2658–2669. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.2c00498

Tima, M. T., & Sutrisno, H. (2018). Influence of Problem Solving Based on Multiple Representations Model on Teaching and Learning of Chemistry on Student Academic Self-Efficacy and Students’s Cognitive Achievement. American Journal of Educational Research, 6(7), 887-892. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-6-7-1

Trivic, D. D., & . Milanovic, V. D. (2018). The macroscopic, cubmicroscopic and symbolic level in explanation of a chemical reaction provided by thirteen-year olds. Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society, 83(0):1-16. https://doi.org/10.2298/JSC171220055T

Widarti, H. R., Marfu’ah, S., & Parlan. (2019). The Effects of Using Multiple Representations on Prospective Teachers’ Conceptual Understanding of Intermolecular Forces. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1227(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1227/1/012006.

Wildan, W., Supriadi, Hadisaputra, S., Muti’ah, M., Siahaan, J., & Ariani, S. (2023). Melatih Model Mental Kimia Siswa Sman 1 Sambelia Menggunakan Media Augmented Reality. Jurnal Pengabdian Inovasi Masyarakat Indonesia, 2(1):31–35. https://dx.doi.org/10.29303/jpimi.v2i1.2246

Ye, J., Lu, S., & Bi, H. (2019). The effects of microcomputer-based laboratories on students’ macro, micro, and symbolic representations when learning about net ionic reactions. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(1), 288–301. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RP00165K

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Surbakti, L. E. B., Parhusip, M. M., Patulak, N., Palilingan, S. C., Rumengan, S. M., & Akbar, J. S. (2026). CHEMLIT: Development and Feasibility of a Sensor-Based Chemistry Practicum Tool for Electrolyte Solutions. Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v14i2.19512

Issue

Section

Articles