Analysis of Grade XII Students' Mathematical Perceptions in Learning Colligative Properties of Solutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v14i1.19105Keywords:
Chemistry Learning, Mathematical Perceptions, Colligative Properties of Solutions, CorrelationsAbstract
Chemistry learning, especially in the subject of colligative properties of solutions, requires quantitative abilities and appropriate mathematical skills. Various studies show that difficulties in mathematics can hinder the understanding of abstract and calculation-based chemistry concepts. However, studies that specifically examine students' perceptions of mathematical ability challenges and their relationship to understanding the colligative properties of solutions are still limited. Therefore, this study aims to describe students' perceptions of mathematical ability and their understanding of the colligative properties of solutions, as well as to analyze the relationship between these two variables. This study uses a quantitative approach with a descriptive-correlational method. The research subjects consisted of 37 students of class XII C6 of State Senior High School 2 Tanjungpinang in the 2025/2026 academic year. Data were collected through a closed questionnaire using a five-point Likert scale consisting of 35 statements, covering the variables of perception of mathematical ability and understanding of the colligative properties of solutions. Data analysis was performed descriptively and using Pearson's correlation test with the help of IBM SPSS Statistics 24. The results showed that students' perceptions of mathematical ability were in the good to fair category, while their understanding of the colligative properties of solutions tended to be in the fair category. The Pearson correlation test produced a coefficient of r = 0.672 with a significance value of 0.000, indicating a strong positive and significant relationship between students' perception of mathematical ability and their understanding of the colligative properties of solutions. These findings emphasize the importance of strengthening students' abilities and confidence in mathematics to improve their understanding of quantitative chemistry concepts.
References
Anchen, C., & Ying, Z. (2022). Mathematics Learning Permormance: Its Correlation with Chemistry Learning Performance. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(2), 134–146. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v5i2.12075
Anggraini, L., Maison, & Syaiful. (2022). Attitude and Understanding of Concepts: It’s Influence in Science Learning. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 6(3), 423–430. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v6i3.45991
Azzahrah, F., & Irmanda, H. N. (2024). Analisis Korelasi Pearson: Faktor Pengaruh Generative AI terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa ITS Surabaya. Jurnal Sistem Informasi dan Aplikasi (JSIA), 1(1), 50–64. https://www.jiip.stkipyapisdompu.ac.id/jiip/index.php/JIIP/article/download/8680/5959
Bjerke, A. H., Hungnes, T., Bachmann, K. E., Hatlevik, O. E., & Ødemark, I. L. (2026). Sources of mathematics and science self-efficacy in primary and secondary education: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 50, 100760. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100760
Chen, H., Xu, Y., Wang, D., Zhang, X., Ma, J., & Tang, S. (2024). The mediating role of self-efficacy between high school students’ perceived teacher support and mathematics feedback literacy. Learning and Motivation, 88, 102065. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102065
Cullen, P., Hynes, S., Ryan, M., & O’Donoghue, C. (2021). More than two decades of Agri-Environment schemes: Has the profile of participating farms changed? Journal of Environmental Management, 292, 112826. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112826
Fan, Y., Tian, P., Ma, Y., & Wu, L. (2025). Evaluating Students’ Chemistry Quantitative Reasoning Skills (QRSC) in lower-secondary schools. International Journal of Science Education, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2025.2540619
Faradiba Jabnabillah, & Nur Margina. (2022). Analisis Korelasi Pearson Dalam Menentukan Hubungan Antara Motivasi Belajar Dengan Kemandirian Belajar Pada Pembelajaran Daring. Jurnal Sintak, 1(1), 14–18. https://doi.org/
Gunawan, T. I., Alvian, A., Hermani, Halimatul, H. S., Nurhadi, A. R., & Nata, S. L. (2023). Jurnal Riset dan Praktik Pendidikan Kimia. Jurnal Riset Dan Praktik Pendidikan Kimia, 11(2), 39–49.
Habiddin, H., & Nagol, I. L. (2023). Chemistry Students’ Mathematics Ability and Their Understanding of Buffer Solution. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(10), 8140–8145. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.3682
Hillmayr, D., Ziernwald, L., Reinhold, F., Hofer, S. I., & Reiss, K. M. (2020). The potential of digital tools to enhance mathematics and science learning in secondary schools: A context-specific meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 153, 103897.
Holme, T. (2019). Chapter 2 - Incorporating elements of green and sustainable chemistry in general chemistry via systems thinking (A. P. Dicks & L. D. B. T.-I. G. and S. C. P. into E. Bastin (eds.); pp. 31–47). Elsevier. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817418-0.00002-4
Johnson, D., Hashaikeh, R., & Hilal, N. (2021). Basic principles of osmosis and osmotic pressure. Osmosis Engineering, 11, 251–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821016-1.00011-5
Kurniawan, A., Emyus, A. Z., Atmaja, I. W. W., Pgri, U., & Jember, A. (2025). Kritis Matematis Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Kelas Iv Sdn Pancakarya 02 Semester Genap Tahun Pembelajaran 2024-2025. 463–478.
Lee, K. S., Rix, B., & Spivey, M. Z. (2023). Predictions of success in organic chemistry based on a mathematics skills test and academic achievement. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 24(1), 176–191. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RP00140C
Liou, P. Y., Jang, J., & Myoung, E. (2024). Synergistic effects of students’ mathematics and science motivational beliefs on achievement, and their determinants. International Journal of STEM Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00509-z
Lopez, E. C. R. (2025). Factors influencing the academic performance of chemical engineering students in physical chemistry. Education for Chemical Engineers, 52, 119–132. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2025.05.008
Maulim Silitonga, P., Tua, F., Panggabean, M., Susanti, N., Sinaga, M., & Situmorang, D. L. (2022). Hubungan Kemampuan Matematika dan Kemampuan Awal dengan Hasil Belajar Kimia Siswa pada Materi Larutan Penyangga. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Kimia, 4(2). https://jurnal.unimed.ac.id/2012/index.php/jipk
McMillen, A., Brosch, H., Zakhary, K., Juzkiw, S., Fredrickson, L., Tromp, K. M., & Fujiwara, R. (2024). Retrospective study assessing student utilization of optional practice questions on pharmacy calculations final examination performance. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching & Learning, 16(12), 102203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2024.102203
Memmedova, K., & Ertuna, B. (2024). Development of a fuzzy Likert scales to measure variables in social sciences. Information Sciences, 654, 119792. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2023.119792
Musollini, S., Soukoulis, C., Tolve, R., You, L., Zanoni, M., Aprea, E., Gasperi, F., & Favati, F. (2026). Viscoelastic characterisation of high protein ice cream: Predicting tactile sensory properties via time–concentration superposition and large amplitude oscillatory shear (LAOS) rheology. Food Hydrocolloids, 172, 112028. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2025.112028
Oppong-Gyebi, E., Dissou, Y. A., Brantuo, W. A., Maanu, V., Boateng, F. O., & Adu-Obeng, B. (2023). Improving STEM mathematics achievement through self-efficacy, student perception, and mathematics connection: The mediating role of student interest. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 7(4), 186–202. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202321085
Pratiwi, Y. N., Analita, R. N., Rohmah, R. S., & Rahayu, W. (2024). Hubungan Kemampuan Penalaran Formal Dengan Prestasi Kimia Siswa Kelas XII Dan Kontribusinya Terhadap Tingkat Pemahamannya Di Pendidikan Tinggi. Jurnal Ilmiah Kanderang Tingang, 15(1), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.37304/jikt.v15i1.324
Refaldi, D. A., Faiz, A., Jawakory, M. R., & Rakhmawati, N. A. (2024). Analisis Korelasi Pearson: Faktor Pengaruh Generative Ai Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa ITS Surabaya. Jurnal Sistem Informasi dan Aplikasi (JSIA), 3(3).
Shone, E. T., Weldemeskel, F. M., & Worku, B. N. (2024). The role of students’ mathematics perception and self‐efficacy toward their mathematics achievement. In Psychology in the Schools (Vol. 61, Issue 1, pp. 103–122). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.23033
Simorangkir, A., & Rohaeti, E. (2025). Fostering Confidence in Chemistry: How Problem-Based Learning Elevates Self-Efficacy. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Sains, 13(1), 198–206. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v13i1.84437
Street, K. E. S., Malmberg, L. E., & Schukajlow, S. (2024). Students’ mathematics self-efficacy: a scoping review. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 56(2), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01548-0
Tua, F., Panggabean, M., Ridho, D., Aulianti, D., Azhari, S. W., Syafitri, A., Yurinda, A., Kimia, D., & Medan, U. N. (2025). Medan Terhadap Konsep Sifat Koligatif Larutan Dalam. 7(2), 309–321.
Yang, Y., Maeda, Y., & Gentry, M. (2024). The relationship between mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics achievement: multilevel analysis with NAEP 2019. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-024-00204-z
Yanti, H., Sidauruk, S., & Asi, N. B. (2024). Students’ difficulties in understanding the concept of determining reaction enthalpy changes in Grade XI-MIPA Senior High School for the 2022/2023 academic year using diagnostic essay tests. Jurnal Ilmiah Kanderang Tingang, 15(2), 443–450. https://doi.org/10.37304/jikt.v15i2.227
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aira Putri Januar, Meidiana Dwi Setyo Rini, Nur Feby Richi Ananda, Nur Fikriyah, Puan Afra Edhrinabila, Yurisa Okta Werdiani, Fathiya Rohadatul Aisy, Nina Adriani, Ervinna Ima Suryani Damanik, Safrawita

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia uses a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data: Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default) Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

