Gender Equity in Ethnoscience Learning: Evidence from Preservice Teachers’ Perceptions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/bioscientist.v14i1.20081Keywords:
Ethnoscience learning, gender equity, preservice teachers, perception, science educationAbstract
This study examines gender-based differences in preservice biology teachers’ perceptions of ethnoscience-based learning, with particular attention to its potential to support equitable learning experiences. Grounded in the perspective of culturally responsive pedagogy, ethnoscience-based learning is assumed to foster inclusivity by integrating local knowledge into science instruction. This study employed a quantitative explanatory design with a cross-sectional approach, involving 28 participants selected through convenience sampling. Data were collected using a validated Likert-scale questionnaire measuring perceived learning quality, suitability to students’ ability levels, and learning motivation. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and an independent-samples t-test. The results indicate that ethnoscience-based learning was generally perceived positively, with a moderate-to-high overall mean score (M = 2.98 on a 4-point scale). Male (M = 3.13) and female (M = 2.91) participants reported similarly favorable perceptions. However, the independent-samples t-test revealed no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.116 > 0.05). These findings suggest that perceptions of ethnoscience-based learning tend to be consistent across gender groups, although such results should be interpreted cautiously given the limited sample size. From a gender perspective, the absence of significant differences in perception indicates a comparable level of perceived learning experience among male and female students, rather than confirming the full realization of gender equity. The findings highlight the potential of ethnoscience-based learning as an inclusive instructional approach, while also emphasizing the need for further investigation using broader samples and more comprehensive indicators of equity, such as participation, access, and learning outcomes. This study contributes to the growing discourse on culturally responsive and gender-sensitive practices in science teacher education
References
Aikenhead, G. S. (2001). Integrating Western and Aboriginal sciences: Cross-cultural science teaching. Research in Science Education, 31(3), 337–355. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013151109605
Aikenhead, G. S., & Jegede, O. J. (1999). Cross-cultural science education: A cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(3), 269–287.
Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 485–499. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20131
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2009). Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes. Science, 326(5958), 1410–1412.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3), 85–118.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465
Liao, W., Wang, C., Zhou, J., Cui, Z., Sun, X., Bo, Y., ... Dang, Q. (2022). Effects of equity-oriented teacher education on preservice teachers: A systematic review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 120, 103891.
Maiga, I. H., & Bowe, B. (2012). Enhancing students’ understanding of ecology: A Malian ethnoscientific approach. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(5), 572–596. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21013
Muliadi, A., Rokhmat, J., Hakim, A., & Sukarso, A. A. (2023). Profile of attitudes of science teacher candidates towards indigenous science-based science learning. Prisma Sains, 11(2), 642–652. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v11i2.7454
Muliadi, A., Suhirman, S., Wazni, M. K., Yamin, M., & Khery, Y. (2022). Ethnoscience studies in songket Sasak cloth motifs: Prospective science teacher perceptions. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(6), 2613–2620. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i6.2414
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science, 328(5977), 463–466. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183944
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
Paris, D., & Alim, H. S. (2014). What are we seeking to sustain through culturally sustaining pedagogy? A loving critique forward. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 85–100.
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
Rahayu, M., Keim, A. P., Nikmatullah, M., Rustiami, H., Susan, D., & Sujarwo, W. (2021). The ethnoecology of Sasak people in Mandalika, Lombok Island. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(3), 407–415. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i3.29923
Slavin, R. E. (2009). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (9th ed.). Pearson Education.
Sudarmin, S., Sumarni, W., Endang, R. S., & Susilogati, S. (2017). Implementing the model of project-based learning integrated with ETHNO-STEM. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 824, 012145. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/824/1/012145
Sudarmin, S., Sumarni, W., & Sari, R. (2019). Ethnoscience approach in science learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1317(1), 012145. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012145
Supriyadi, S., Suryadi, B., & Sutarto. (2018). Integrating local wisdom with modern science education in Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1127a
UNESCO. (2017). Cracking the code: Girls’ and women’s education in STEM. UNESCO Publishing.
Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. L. (2017). Gender gap in STEM: Current knowledge and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x
Wiryanto, R. D., Agustin, E., & Husodo, S. B. (2019). The implementation of local wisdom-based learning to improve learning outcomes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1315(1), 012113. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1315/1/012113
Zhafira, N. H., Ertika, Y., & Chairiyaton. (2020). Persepsi mahasiswa terhadap perkuliahan daring sebagai sarana pembelajaran. Jurnal Bisnis dan Kajian Strategi Manajemen, 4(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.35308/jbkan.v4i1.1981
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ali Imran, Siti Rahma Yunus

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.









