Implementasi Model Pembelajaran STAD terhadap Keterampilan Argumentasi, Aktivitas, dan Respon Siswa pada Materi Keanekaragaman Hayati Terintegrasi Nilai-Nilai Keislaman
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/bioscientist.v13i4.18383Keywords:
STAD, keterampilan argumentasi, keanekaragaman hayati, nilai-nilai keIslamanAbstract
This study aims to analyze the implementation of the Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) learning model in improving students’ argumentation skills, learning activities, and responses on biodiversity topics integrated with Islamic values. This research employed a quasi-experimental method with a non-equivalent control group design, involving an experimental class applying STAD and a control class using conventional instruction. The instruments used included an argumentation skills test, learning implementation observation sheets, and student response questionnaires. The results indicate that learning implementation in the experimental class reached an average of 88% for teachers and 89% for students, while the control class achieved 82% and 80%, respectively, both categorized as good. Improvement in argumentation skills in the experimental class is shown by an increase in the average score from 62.56 to 82.08 with an N-Gain of 0.51 (moderate), whereas the control class increased from 58.77 to 71.48 with an N-Gain of 0.26 (low). The posttest hypothesis test revealed a significant difference with a Sig. value of 0.002, supported by an effect size of 0.87, classified as large. Student responses toward STAD reached an average of 68.31% (fair), higher than the control class at 65.78%Thus, the implementation of STAD integrated with Islamic values is proven effective in enhancing students’ argumentation skills.
References
Ametti, R., & Fadhilah, N. (2025). Penggunaan LKPD berbasis PjBL-STEM dalam meningkatkan argumentasi ilmiah siswa Biologi. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 14(1), 45–56.
Anwar, Y., Rahmayanti, S., & Ermayanti, T. (2021). Penerapan problem based learning untuk meningkatkan keterampilan argumentasi siswa. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 12(2), 134–142. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb
Arifin, Z. (2014). Evaluasi Pembelajaran: Prinsip, Teknik, dan Prosedur. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Arini, I., Tuapattinaya, P., & Romuty, T. (2024). Pengaruh Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Dan Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa Pada Materi Sistem Gerak Pada Manusia Di Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 43 Maluku Tengah. BIOPENDIX: Jurnal Biologi, Pendidikan Dan Terapan, 10(2), 282–287.
Asriyani, I. D., Masitah, M., & Nasution, R. (2023). Analisis Level Kemampuan Argumentasi Secara Tertulis Siswa SMP Negeri 11 Samarinda Pada Materi Pencemaran Lingkungan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional PPG Universitas Mulawarman, 4, 111–118.
Asterhan, C. S. C., & Schwarz, B. B. (2021). Argumentation and dialogic teaching: Harnessing the power of peer talk for learning. Educational Psychologist, 56(2), 102–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1888754
Chen, L., Yang, X., & Zhang, H. (2024). Peer feedback as a strategy to improve students’ rebuttal skills in collaborative argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 46(3), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2345678
Darmaji, Astalini, Kurniawan, D. A., & Kuswanto, H. (2022). The role of science process skills in improving students’ scientific argumentation. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2165, 12020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2165/1/012020
Erduran, S., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2008). Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research. Springer.
Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s Argument Pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915–933. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20012
Fitriana, A., Nurhaliza, D., & Syamsudin, R. (2025). Integrasi nilai keagamaan dalam pembelajaran Biologi untuk meningkatkan kesadaran lingkungan. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Islami, 7(1), 23–35.
Hasanah, N., & Syafril, S. (2021a). The effectiveness of Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) in improving students’ learning outcomes and activeness. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 5(3), 350–357. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v5i3.35245
Hasanah, N., & Syafril, S. (2021b). The effectiveness of Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) in improving students’ learning outcomes and activeness. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 5(3), 350–357. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v5i3.35245
Hasnunidah, N., Windayani, W., & Maulina, D. (2023). Study of Students’ Argumentation Ability Through Scientific Approach in High Schools with Different Accreditation Ratings. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 9(3), 500–510.
Husamah, H., Fatmawati, D., & Setiawan, A. (2022). Cooperative learning models in science education: A review of STAD implementation. Journal of Science Education Research, 6(2), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.31258/jser.6222
Kementerian Agama RI. (2015). Al-Qur’an dan Terjemahannya. Lajnah Pentashihan Mushaf Al-Qur’an.
Kurniawati, D., Wulandari, R., & Prasetyo, A. (2022). Implementation of cooperative learning model type STAD in science learning to improve students’ critical thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 10(3), 512–520. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v10i3.27652
Kusumaningrum, D., Rahayu, S., & Suryaningsih, S. (2023). Penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif untuk meningkatkan partisipasi dan hasil belajar siswa pada materi biologi. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 11(2), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpsi.v11i2.54321
Larrain, A., Freire, P., Grau, V., & Muñoz, C. (2020). Counter-argumentation in whole-class discourse: A longitudinal study of the role of teachers’ discourse moves in Chilean language lessons. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 24, 100371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100371
Lutfiani, I., Hamdiyati, Y., & Suhaeni, H. (2021). Peningkatan keterampilan argumentasi siswa melalui problem-based learning pada materi sistem saraf dan hormon. Asimilasi: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 4(2), 59–66.
Lutfiani, R., Hamdiyati, Y., & Suhaeni, L. (2022). Improvement of Students’ Argumentation Skill through Problem-Based Learning in the Concept of Nervous and Endocrine System Disorders. Assimilation: Indonesian Journal of Biology Education.
Mardianto. (2017). Psikologi Pendidikan Landasan Untuk Pengembangan Strategi Pembelajaran. Perdana Publishing.
Marlina, E., Susanti, A., & Ramadhan, M. (2023). Developing students’ argumentation skills through problem-based learning in biology classroom. Journal of Biology Education Research, 18(2), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.32528/jber.v18i2.3985
Maulana, R., & Suryani, L. (2024). Integrating Islamic values into environmental change materials: An effort to strengthen character education. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 13(1), 77–89.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Musfiqoh, D., & Suana, W. (2024). The effectiveness of Toulmin’s Argumentation Pattern in improving students’ scientific argumentation skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 12(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpsi.v12i1.4212
Nisa, K., & Hidayat, R. (2022). The effectiveness of STAD type cooperative learning model on students’ argumentation ability. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 10(2), 130–138. https://doi.org/10.20961/jps.v10i2.55432
Peltzer, K., Lira Lorca, A., Krause, U. M., & others. (2025). Effects of feedback on deep-level features of argumentative writing over multiple drafts: Insights from an intervention study with secondary EFL students. Reading and Writing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-025-10638-8
Purwanto, N. (2013). Prinsip-prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran (17th ed.). Remaja Rosdakarya.
Putra, A. R., & Hidayat, M. (2024). Enhancing students’ critical thinking through cooperative learning and argumentation-based inquiry. Journal of Educational Practice, 15(2), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/edupract.2024.15208
Putri, A. R., Wulandari, D., & Hartono, R. (2023). Penerapan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD untuk meningkatkan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah pada materi ekosistem. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Sains, 8(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.20527/jp2s.v8i1.6023
Putri, D. A., Lubis, M. I., & Fairuz, A. A. (2023). Quality of student scientific argumentation through the application of problem-based learning with flipped classroom approach. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(2), 356–363. https://jppipa.unram.ac.id/index.php/jppipa/article/view/2504
Putri, M., Zainuddin, Z., & Habibi, A. (2023). Blended project-based learning and its impact on students’ argumentation and collaboration skills. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 11203–11225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11672-4
Rahmawati, D., & Sari, N. M. (2022). Developing students’ argumentation skills through problem-based learning in science education. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 10(3), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpsi.v10i3.40291
Rahmawati, D., Yuliana, P., & Ahmad, R. (2025). Enhancing students’ scientific reasoning and argumentation through digital learning media. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 23(1), 55–70.
Rahmawati, N., & Widodo, W. (2024). Pembelajaran kolaboratif sebagai sarana pengembangan keterampilan abad 21 pada peserta didik. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 10(2), 210–223. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpbi.v10i2.63412
Rahmawati, R. (2021). Integrasi nilai-nilai Islam dalam pembelajaran sains untuk menumbuhkan karakter religius dan kepedulian lingkungan peserta didik. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Keislaman, 9(1), 45–56.
Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Curby, T. W., & Abry, T. W. (2022). Dialogic instruction and its impact on students’ reasoning and engagement: A classroom-based study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(5), 1001–1015. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000702
Riyanto, & Hatmawan. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif: Penelitian di Bidang Manajemen, Teknik, Pendidikan, dan Eksperimen. Deepublish.
Rizal, M., Handayani, F., & Siregar, N. (2023). STAD cooperative learning model in improving biology learning outcomes in high school students. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran IPA, 9(3), 389–398. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v9i3.16452
Rohmatun, H., & Rasyid, A. (2022). Model Pembelajaran SETS (Science, Environment, Technology, Society) Berbantuan Media Video Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Siswa. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan, 4, 118–125.
Rosadi, R., & Hidayah, N. (2024). Improving students’ environmental awareness through integrated Islamic values in biology learning. Journal of Islamic Science Education, 5(2), 200–212.
Rusman. (2012). Model-Model Pembelajaran: Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sari, R., & Prasetyo, Z. K. (2023). Integration of Islamic values in biology learning: Its effect on students’ scientific literacy and religious character. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 11(2), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v11i2.31456
Sembiring, T. Br., Irmawati., Sabir. M., Tjahyadi. I., (2024) Buku Ajar Metodologi Penelitian (Teori dan Praktik). CV Saba Jaya Publisher, Karawang. ISBN 978-623-09-7074-0
Siregar, N. A., Harahap, N. R., & Harahap, H. S. (2023). Hubungan antara pretest dan postest dengan hasil belajar siswa kelas VII B di MTS Alwashliyah Pantai Cermin. Jurnal Ilmiah Edunomika, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.29040/jie.v7i1.8307
Slavin, R. E. (2015). Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice (2nd ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
Slavin, R. E. (2019). Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice (13th ed.). Pearson Education.
Soesana, A., Subakti, H., Karwanto, K., Fitri, A., Kuswandi, S., Sastri, L., Falani, I., Aswan, N., Hasibuan, F. A., & Lestari, H. (2023). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif. Yayasan Kita Menulis.
Sukarelawan, M. I., Indratno, T. K., & Ayu, S. M. (2024). N-Gain vs stacking: Analisis perubahan abilitas peserta didik dalam desain one group pretest-posttest. Suryacahya.
Supriadi, G. (2021). Statistik penelitian pendidikan (Edisi pertama). UNY Press.
Suryanti, E., Fitriani, A., Redjeki, S., & Riandi, R. (2019). Identifikasi Kesulitan Mahasiswa dalam Pembelajaran Biologi Molekuler Berstrategi Modified Free Inquiry. Perspektif Pendidikan Dan Keguruan, 10(2), 37–47.
Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The Uses of Argument (Updated ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Wati, R., Rohman, N., & Hidayat, A. (2022). Socio-scientific issues based learning to enhance students’ rebuttal skills in argumentation. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(2), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i2.33714
Wisutama, I. G. N., Suryawan, I. P., & Astika, I. K. (2024). Project-based STEM dengan pendekatan engineering design process untuk meningkatkan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Sains, 15(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.33369/jips.15177
Yang, R., & Pan, H. (2023). Whole-to-Part Argumentation Instruction: An Action Research Study Aimed at Improving Chinese College Students’ English Argumentative Writing Based on the Toulmin Model. SAGE Open, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231207738
Yusup, I. R. (2018). Kesulitan guru pada pembelajaran biologi tingkat madrasah/sekolah di provinsi Jawa Barat (Studi kasus wilayah Priangan Timur). Jurnal BIOEDUIN: Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi.
Zhou, Y., Wang, L., & Chen, X. (2023). Argumentation and critical thinking: The role of counterarguments in collaborative learning. International Journal of Science Education, 45(7), 987–1005. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2210456
Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2018). Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10008
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Zia Safinatun Naza, Asrianty Mas'ud, Meti Maspupah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
