Differences In Learning Outcomes Of Students Taught With Problem Based Learning Model Assisted By iSpring Suite 10 Media And Powerpoint On Chemical Equilibrium Material

Authors

  • Ayulia Annisa Nasution Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Jasmidi Jasmidi State University Of Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jtp.v8i3.7439

Keywords:

Problem Based Learning Model, iSpring Suite 10 Media, Powerpoint Media, Learning Outcomes, Chemical Equilibrium,

Abstract

This research aims to determine whether there are differences in student learning outcomes taught with the Problem Based Learning model assisted by iSpring Suite 10 media and PowerPoint on chemical equilibrium material. This research method uses quantitative research methods. This research was conducted at SMA Negeri 4 Medan, where the population in this study were all students of class XI IPA. The samples used in this study were two classes determined by the purposive sampling technique. The samples in this study were XI IPA 5 class as the first experimental class taught with the Problem Based Learning model assisted by iSpring Suite 10 media and XI IPA 7 class as the second experimental class taught with the Problem Based Learning model assisted by PowerPoint media. This research was conducted by research stages: 1) Giving a pretest, 2) The learning process, and 3) Giving a posttest. This study uses test instruments in the form of multiple choice questions as many as 20 questions that have met the requirements. The results of the research data analysis obtained the average student learning outcomes in experimental class I pretest value (44,16) and posttest value (82,08) with an average increase in learning outcomes of 69,47%, and the average student learning outcomes in experimental class II pretest value (43,88) and posttest value (76,81) with an average increase in learning outcomes of 61,28%. The average difference in student learning outcomes (posttest scores) of the two experimental classes was obtained by 5,278. Hypothesis testing was carried out with a two-party t-test and obtained sig. (0,04) < ∠(0,05) so that the results show that Ha is accepted and H0 is rejected, which means that there is a difference in the average learning outcomes of students taught with iSpring Suite 10 media and PowerPoint on chemical equilibrium material.

Author Biographies

Ayulia Annisa Nasution, Universitas Negeri Medan

Jurusan Kimia/Fakultas Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam

Jasmidi Jasmidi, State University Of Medan

Jurusan Kimia/Fakultas Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam

References

Aritonang, H. W., & Zubir, M. (2020). Perbedaan hasil belajar dan motivasi belajar siswa dengan menggunakan model PBL dan pembelajaran konvensional berbantuan media iSpring pada materi laju reaksi. Educater: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 1(4), 346-352.

Ariyanti, D., Harwanto, & Mustaji. (2020). Multimedia Interaktif Berbasis iSpring Suite 8. Jurnal Education and Development, 8(2), 381–389.

Atika, D., Nuswowati, M., & Nurhayati, S. (2018). Pengaruh metode discovery learning berbantuan video terhadap hasil belajar kimia siswa SMA. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia,12(2).

Budiariawan, I. P. (2019). Hubungan motivasi belajar dengan hasil belajar pada mata pelajaran kimia. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 3(2), 103-111.

Dalimunthe, S. K., & Roza, D. (2021). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Ispring Presenter Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Materi MInyak Bumi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kimia, 159-165.

Darmadi, H. (2019). Pengantar Pendidikan Era Globalisasi: Konsep Dasar, Teori, Strategi, dan Implementasi Dalam Pendidikan Globalisasi. Banten: An1mage.

Dasmo, D., Lestari, A. P., & Alamsyah, M. (2020). Peningkatan hasil belajar fisika melalui penerapan media pembelajaran interaktif berbasis iSpring Suite 9. In SINASIS (Seminar Nasional Sains), 1(01).

Faizah, S. N. (2017). Hakikat Belajar dan Pembelajaran. At-Thullab: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 175-185.

Indriani, A. S. (2017). Identifikasi kesulitan peserta didik dalam memahami kesetimbangan kimia. J-PEK (Jurnal Pembelajaran Kimia), 2(1), 9-13.

Jannah, M. C. (2018). Pengaruh Model Problem Based Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar Dan Keterampilan Proses Sains. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 2097 – 2107.

Maulana, M. P., Solikhin, F., & Dewi, K. (2021). Penerapan Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) Dalam Meningkatkan Aktivitas Dan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Pada Materi Kesetimbangan Kimia SMAN 3 Kota Bengkulu. Jurnal Zarah, 9(2), 75-82.

Mawarni, R., & Syafriani, D. (2022). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran dan Minat Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Kesetimbangan Kimia Di SMA. Jurnal Sekolah, 139-145.

Sastrakusumah, E. N., Suherman, U., Darmawan, D., & Jamilah, J. (2018). Pengaruh media pembelajaran interaktif berbantuan aplikasi iSpring presenter terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis. Teknologi Pembelajaran, 3(1).

Sufairoh. (2017). Pendekatan saintifik dan model pembelajaran K-13. Jurnal Pendidikan Profesional, 122-123.

Valdez, J. E., & Bungihan, M. E. (2019). Problem-based learning approach enhances the problem solving skills in chemistry of high school students. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(3), 282–294. https://doi.org/10.3926/JOTSE.631.

Watoni, M., & Savalas, L. R. (2021). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas XI IPA SMAN 4 Praya Pada Materi Laju Reaksi Tahun Pelajaran 2019/2020. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Indonesia, 3(1), 71-76.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-20

How to Cite

Nasution, A. A., & Jasmidi, J. (2023). Differences In Learning Outcomes Of Students Taught With Problem Based Learning Model Assisted By iSpring Suite 10 Media And Powerpoint On Chemical Equilibrium Material. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pembelajaran, 8(3), 538–547. https://doi.org/10.33394/jtp.v8i3.7439

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 3 (2023): July

Section

Articles

License

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.

Copyright

  1. Authors who publish with JTP agree to the following terms:
  2. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
  5. Licensing for Data Publication

Licensing for Data Publication

JTP use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)