Slangs in Gen Alpha–Z: A Natural Language Processing Analysis and Its Impact in Educational Context

Authors

  • Afi Fadlilah Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Irma Diani Universitas Bengkulu, Indonesia
  • Encep Kusumah Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Eni Sugiharyanti Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
  • Titik Ceriyani Miswaty Universitas Bumigora Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v13i4.16575

Keywords:

Digital education, Natrual language processing, Slang language, Social identity

Abstract

Slang, especially among Generations Alpha and Z, functions as a dynamic tool for expressing identity, group belonging, creativity, and resistance to norms, shaped by digital platforms and used to signal cultural affiliation, shared values, and emotional stance in everyday communication. This study aims at evaluating the forms of slang language used by Generations Alpha and Z, linguistic patterns indirectly represent or construct social identity the influence of those slangs in educational context. This study followed a rigorous process to ensure data relevance, validity, and ethics by collecting publicly available Instagram texts from Generations Alpha and Z using purposive sampling. Data from public accounts were anonymized, scraped manually and automatically, then preprocessed through cleaning, tokenization, and normalization. NLP techniques and qualitative content analysis were applied to identify slang patterns and interpret their social meanings, revealing how slang reflects identity and cultural practices in digital youth communication. The analysis concludes that slang usage among Generations Alpha and Z on digital platforms like Instagram serves not merely as casual expression but as a communicative strategy that reflects social identity, group affiliation, and cultural values. Through a combination of computational and qualitative analysis, the study reveals that slang functions to assert community membership, convey emotional attitudes, and construct self-image in digital spaces. The emerging linguistic patterns highlight the significant role of informal language in digital literacy practices and educational interactions, underscoring the need for greater attention to youth language in both academic and cultural contexts. Previous studies have examined youth slang, but few have explored its role across digital platforms in shaping identity, especially using both computational and sociolinguistic approaches. The influence of slang in educational contexts also remains underexplored. This study addresses these gaps by analyzing slang's forms, functions, and meanings in digital youth communication.

Author Biographies

Afi Fadlilah, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Linguistics Lecturer, Faculty of Language and Art Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. Setiabudi No.229, Isola, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia

Irma Diani, Universitas Bengkulu

Indonesian Language Education, FKIP, Universitas Bengkulu, Jl. WR. Supratman, Kandang Limun, Sumatera, Bengkulu, Indonesia

Encep Kusumah, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Linguistics Lecturer, Faculty of Language and Art Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. Setiabudi No.229, Isola, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia

Eni Sugiharyanti, Universitas Brawijaya

France Language and Literature Study Program, Faculty of Culture, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia

Titik Ceriyani Miswaty, Universitas Bumigora Indonesia

Linguistics Lecturer, Universitas Bumigora Indonesia, Jl. Ismail Marzuki No.22, Cilinaya, Cakranegara, Mataram, West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia

References

Abbas, A., Abbas, A., Rasyid, K., & Rabiah, S. (2025). Slang As A Cross-Generational Language and Its Influence On Indonesian Language In The Digital Era: A Morphological Study. Journal of Ecohumanism, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v4i2.6657

AlMamoory (Ph.D.), Prof. Dr. S. M. A., & Al- Khazaali, Assist. L. T. W. (2024). Linguistic Strategy in Online Digital Communication: A Pragmatic Study. Journal of Media,Culture and Communication, 43, 10–21. https://doi.org/10.55529/jmcc.43.10.21

Bazana, S. (2024). Psychology Identity. Encyclopedia of Organizational Psychology, 23(03). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378129939

Boutet, J., Fiala, P., & Simonin-Grumbach, J. (2025). Sociolinguistics or sociology of language. International Journal of the Sociology of Language. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2024-0057

Cayır, A., & Çalışkan, F. (2025). The relationship of media and technology use status and attitudes of nursing students with self-directed learning skills. Nurse Education Today, 148, 106634. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106634

Coleman, E. G. (2010). Ethnographic approaches to digital media. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39, 487–505. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104945

Djamereng, J., Ali, M., & Abdullah, E. (2024). Register and Slang: Distinct Forms of Language Variation in Communities. IDEAS Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 12(2), 3199–3211. https://doi.org/10.2456/ideas

Dynel, M. (2023). Lessons in linguistics with ChatGPT: Metapragmatics, metacommunication, metadiscourse and metalanguage in human-AI interactions. Language and Communication, 93, 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2023.09.002

Gongane, V., Munot, M., & Anuse, D. (2024). A survey of explainable AI techniques for detection of fake news and hate speech on social media platforms. Journal of Computational Social Science, 7, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-024-00248-9

Hu, J., & Cheung, C. K. J. (2024). Social identity and social integration: a meta-analysis exploring the relationship between social identity and social integration. In Frontiers in Psychology (Vol. 15). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1361163

Lee, J., Hicke, Y., Yu, R., Brooks, C., & Kizilcec, R. F. (2024). The life cycle of large language models in education: A framework for understanding sources of bias. In British Journal of Educational Technology (Vol. 55, Issue 5, pp. 1982–2002). John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13505

Maathuis, C., & Chockalingam, S. (2023). Modelling Responsible Digital Security Behaviour for Countering Social Media Manipulation. Proceedings of European Conference on Social Media, 10.

Machin, D., Ledin, P., & Zhao, W. (2025). How the nature of social media platforms supports faulty knowledge production by influencers: The case of nutrition guidance for mothers on Chinese social media. Discourse, Context and Media, 64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2025.100866

Mandal, B. (2024). AI-Driven Discourse: Reimagining Pragmatics and Sociolinguistics in Digital English Communication. Literary Enigma: The International Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture, 43(3). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15315713

Nashrudina, P. G. G., Fajriyah, A. M., & Dewi, T. I. (2025). The Role of TikTok in Shaping Generation Z’s Slang: Semantic Change and Language Use in Digital Communication. Cultural Narratives, 2(3), 146–156. https://doi.org/10.59066/cn.v2i3.1005

Pérez-Torres, V. (2024). Social media: a digital social mirror for identity development during adolescence. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-05980-z

Sengul, K. (2025). How are far-right online communities using X/Twitter Spaces? Discourse, communication, sharing. Discourse, Context and Media, 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2025.100884

Shahbaz, M., & Mushtaq, S. (2025). Indus Journal of Social Sciences Towards Inclusive AI: A Theoretical Exploration of Sociolinguistic Variations and Biases in NLP Models. In Indus Journal of Social Sciences (Vol. 3, Issue 1). https://induspublishers.com/IJSS/about

Teo, P., & and Cui, R. (2023). A comparative critical analysis of official and personal social media videos on being and becoming old in China. Social Semiotics, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2025.2451927

Thellefsen, M., & Friedman, A. (2024). Icons and metaphors in visual communication: The relevance of Peirce’s theory of iconicity for the analysis of visual communication. In Public Journal of Semiotics (Vol. 10, Issue 2).

Ting, C. J. (2024). The discursive construction of language ownership and responsibility for Indigenous language revitalisation. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 28(1), 46–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12630

Wang, J., Wong, L., & Abdullah, M. (2025). The Role of the Youdao Online Dictionary in Facilitating Chinese Slang Learning Among Second-Language Learners. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i5.8795

Yang, P., Zhang, S., Jiang, Y., Yang, C., & Liu, S. (2025). Effects of using internet slang versus standard language in ads on brand attitude. Industrial Management & Data Systems. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-08-2024-0778

Yang, Z., Du, Y., Liu, D., Zhao, K., & Cong, M. (2025). A human-robot interaction system for automated chemical experiments based on vision and natural language processing semantics. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 146, 110226. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2025.110226

Zappavigna, M., & and Logi, L. (2023). How emoji make meaning and enact ambient affiliation: a social semiotic account of emoji-text relations in TikTok comments. Social Semiotics, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2024.2389520

Downloads

Published

2025-10-21

How to Cite

Fadlilah, A., Diani, I., Kusumah, E., Sugiharyanti, E., & Miswaty, T. C. (2025). Slangs in Gen Alpha–Z: A Natural Language Processing Analysis and Its Impact in Educational Context. JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 13(4), 1915–1928. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v13i4.16575

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check