Enhancing Students’ Narrative Writing Skills through Dictogloss: Evidence from a Vocational High School Context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v13i4.16230Keywords:
Dictogloss technique, Narrative writing, Writing skills, English learning, Teaching skillsAbstract
Students’ English narrative-writing skills remain weak, yet writing competence is essential in today’s global context. This study investigated the effectiveness of the Dictogloss technique for improving students’ narrative writing through a mixed-method classroom action research design involving eleventh-grade students at SMK N 1 Tanjung Selor. Data were gathered from observations, students’ worksheets, and writing tests, and analyzed using direct observation notes, self-assessment, and an analytical writing rubric. Findings revealed consistent gains across the five key aspects of writing—content, organization, vocabulary, grammar, and mechanics. From the pre-test to Cycle 1 and Cycle 2, students’ average scores steadily increased, and by the second cycle 34 students (91.2 %) surpassed the passing mark of 75, demonstrating a substantial improvement in overall writing performance. These results confirm the strong positive impact of the Dictogloss method on students’ narrative-writing ability. Pedagogically, teachers are encouraged to integrate Dictogloss as a regular classroom practice by providing structured note-taking activities, guiding pair or group reconstruction of texts, and offering focused feedback on content development, text structure, and precise vocabulary use. Such targeted strategies help students strengthen listening, collaborative, and writing skills simultaneously, ensuring more meaningful engagement and measurable progress in narrative writing. Overall, the research underscores Dictogloss as an integrative method that enhances not only writing accuracy but also collaboration and higher-order thinking skills highly relevant for vocational students preparing for the demands of a global workforce. The implication of the study is that students are encouraged to actively engage in the Dictogloss activities, as these activities help improve writing by developing listening, note-taking, and collaborative skills. It is important to focus on the text's content, structure, and vocabulary when working in pairs, as this will enhance their writing skills.
References
Abbasian, G.-R., & Mohammadi, M. (2013). The Effectiveness of Dictogloss in Developing General Writing Skill of Iranian Intermediate EFL learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(6), 1371–1380. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.4.6.1371-1380
Al-Alwan, A., Asassfeh, S., & Al-Shboul, Y. (2013). EFL learners’ listening comprehension and awareness of metacognitive strategies: How are they related. International Education Studies, 6(9), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n9p31
Alsamadani, H. A. (2022). Dictogloss in Saudi EFL Context: Potential Effects on Students’ Writing Skill and Attitudes towards Learning English. Arab World English Journal, 13(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no1.2
Bataineh, R. F., & Younis, R. A. B. (2016). The Effect of Dictogloss on Jordanian EFL Teachers’ Instructional Practices and Students’ Writing Performance. International Journal of Education and Training (InjET), 2(1), 1–11.
Boyd, R. L., Blackburn, K. G., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2020). The narrative arc: Revealing core narrative structures through text analysis. Science Advances, 6(32), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aba2196
Braine, G. (1998). Local Area Network (LAN) Computers in ESL and EFL Writing Classes Promises and Realities. JALT Journal, 20(2), 47–59.
Brown, E. J., & Heimberg, R. G. (2001). Effects of writing about rape: Evaluating Pennebaker’s paradigm with a severe trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 14(4), 781–790. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013098307063
Conrad, S., & Mauranen, A. (2003). The Corpus of English as Lingua Franca in Academic Settings. TESOL Quarterly, 37(3), 513–527. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588402
Demir, T. (2013). Study of the Relationship Between the Creative Writing Skills of Primary School Students and Their Self-Efficacy Perception. TÜRKİYE International Journal of Turkish Literature Culture Education, 2(1), 84–114.
Dewi, E. M. (2017). Improving Students’ Grammar Using Dictogloss By Eva Muthia Dewi 1 Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh. ENGLISH EDUCATION JOURNAL (EEJ, 8(3), 352–366.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. In Tasked-based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford University Press. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://alad.enallt.unam.mx/modulo7/unidad1/documentos/CLT_EllisTBLT.pdf
Farooq, M., Uzair-Ul-Hassan, M., & Wahid, S. (2012). Opinion of Second Language Learners about Writing Difficulties in English Language. South Asian Studies A Research Journal of South Asian Studies, 27(1), 183–194.
Habibi, F., Eviyuliwati, I., & Kartowisastro, S. (2018). The Effect of Reflective Journal Writing on Studentsr Writing Ability of Narrative Text. 3rd International Conferences on Education in Muslim Society (ICEMS 2017), 115, 16–20. https://doi.org/10.2991/icems-17.2018.4
Hadi, M. S., & Karyadi, A. N. (2023). Can Social Media-Style Fanfiction Stories Enrich Students’ Narrative Writing Mastery? Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 11(1), 123. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v11i1.5814
Harmer, J. (2004). Review of How to Teach Handwriting. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 3(2), 246–248.
Jamil, S., Iqbal Majoka, M., & Kamran, U. (2016). Analyzing Common Errors in English Composition at Postgraduate Level in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (Pakistan). Bulletin of Education and Research, 38(2), 53–67.
Kooshafar, M., Youhanaee, M., & Amirian, Z. (2012). The Effect of Dictogloss Technique on Learners’ Writing Improvement in Terms of Writing Coherent Texts. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(4), 716–721. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.3.4.716-721
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2002). Collaborative Writing in L2: The Effect of Group Interaction on Text Quality. Springer, 11, 169–188.
Mahboob, A. (2014). Epilogue: Understanding Language Variation: Implications for EIL Pedagogy. Springer, 257–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06127-6
Mayo, M. D. P. G. (2002). The effectiveness of two form-focused tasks in advanced EFL pedagogy. International Journal of Applied Linguistics (United Kingdom), 12(2), 156–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/1473-4192.t01-1-00029
Modarresi, G. (2021). The effect of dictogloss vs. debating on L2 writing proficiency: A mixed-methods study. Teaching English as a Second Language Quarter (TESLQ), 8191(4), 121–160. https://doi.org/10.22099/JTLS.2021.39939.2954
Nassaji, H., & Fotos, S. S. (2011). Teaching Grammar in Second Language Classrooms: Integrating Form-Focused Instruction in Communicative Context. New York: Routledge.
Petelin, R. (2016). How Writing Works A Field Guide to Effective Writing. Routledge: Taylor& Francis Group.
Sajid, M., & Siddiqui, J. A. (2015). Lack of Academic Writing Skills in English Language at Higher Education Level in Pakistan : Causes , Effects and Remedies. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(4), 174–186.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2000). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. Researching Pedagogic Tasks, 99–118.
Tok, Ş., & Kandemir, A. (2015). Effects of Creative Writing Activities on Students’ Achievement in Writing, Writing Dispositions and Attitude to English. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174(2015), 1635–1642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.815
White, H. (2010). The fiction of narrative: Essays on history, literature, and theory. Amerika Serikat: JHU Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Marius Randan Kali, Agus Widyantoro, Yuyun Yulia, Nur Hidayanto Pancoro Setyo Putro, Ari Purnawan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
-
Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.














