A Quantitative Analysis of Research Trends and Thematic Development in Derivational Morphology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v13i4.14679Keywords:
Derivational morphology, Quantitative analysis, Research trends, Thematic development, ScientometricsAbstract
Derivational morphology is crucial for understanding the organization of language and dynamics of vocabulary expansion. Despite extensive research in this area, a data-driven analysis of research trends and thematic development has been lacking. This study aims to address this gap by employing a scientometric approach to analyze publications on derivational morphology from 2014 to 2024. Utilizing the Scopus database, a corpus of 370 English-language publications was compiled and analyzed using VOSviewer software. The findings reveal a steady growth in yearly output, with an average of 34 publications per year. Network visualization of keyword co-occurrence identified five prominent thematic clusters: (1) core morphological concepts (22.78%), (2) morphology-semantics interface (20.14%), (3) morphology-syntax interface (19.44%), (4) psycholinguistic perspectives (18.06%), and (5) cognitive aspects of word recognition (14.58%). Collectively, these cluster illuminate the evolving landscape of derivational morphology research, highlighting key areas for future investigation, particularly at the interfaces with semantics, syntax, and cognition. The study’s findings therefore offer guidance for shaping future research trajectories and developing comprehensive morphology curricula that reflect the field’s nature.
References
Al-Sulaihim, N., Abdalla, F., Mahfoudhi, A., & Shaalan, S. (2024). Development of derivational morphology in Kuwaiti Arabic-speaking children. First Language, 44(5), 449–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/01427237241261793
Amenta, S., Günther, F., & Marelli, M. (2020). A (distributional) semantic perspective on the processing of morphologically complex words. Mental Lexicon, 15(1), 62–78. https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.00014.ame
Argus, R., & Kazakovskaya, V. V. (2023). Acquisition of diminutives in Russian and Estonian from a typological perspective. In Diminutives across Languages, Theoretical Frameworks and Linguistic Domains. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110792874-013
Aronoff, M. (2018). Morphology and words: A memoir. In The Lexeme in Descriptive and Theoretical Morphology. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1406987
Bauer, L. (2019). Rethinking morphology. Edinburgh. Edinburgh University Prrss.
Beraldo, R. L., & Araújo-Adriano, P. Â. (2024). What lexical acquisition has to say about a non-lexicalist architecture of grammar – and vice-versa. Isogloss, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/isogloss.460
Bhadra, D. (2024). Verb roots encode outcomes: argument structure and lexical semantics of reversal and restitution. Linguistics and Philosophy, 47(4), 557–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-024-09409-5
Bobkova, N., & Montermini, F. (2023). A quantitative approach to doublets in Russian denominal adjective construction. Word Structure, 16(1), 63–86. https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2023.0221
Booij, G. (2016). Construction Morphology. In The Cambridge Handbook of Morphology (pp. 424–448). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139814720.016
Caha, P., De Clercq, K., & Vanden Wyngaerd, G. (2023). Zero morphology and change-of-state verbs. Zeitschrift Fur Sprachwissenschaft, 42(1), 35–62. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfs-2022-2012
Cohen, Y., Ben-Simon, A., Bar-Siman-Tov, A., Dolev, Y., Karelitz, T., & Levi, E. (2024). Nlp Application in the Hebrew Language for Assessment and Learning. In The Routledge International Handbook of Automated Essay Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003397618-7
Copot, M., Mickus, T., & Bonami, O. (2022). Idiosyncratic frequency as a measure of derivation vs. inflection. Journal of Language Modelling, 10(2), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.15398/jlm.v10i2.301
Diamanti, V., Grande, G., Protopapas, A., Melby-Lervåg, M., & Lervåg, A. (2024). Preschool Morphological Awareness and Developmental Change in Early Reading Ability. Scientific Studies of Reading, 28(6), 591–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2024.2370843
Fradin, B. (2015). Blending. Word-Formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, 1, 386–413. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110246254-023/HTML
Gwilliams, L. E., Monahan, P. J., & Samuel, A. G. (2015). Sensitivity to morphological composition in spoken word recognition: Evidence from grammatical and lexical identification tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 41(6), 1663–1674. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000130
Haley, C., Goldwater, S., & Ponti, E. M. (2024). Corpus-based measures discriminate inflection and derivation cross-linguistically. Journal of Language Modelling, 12(2), 477–529. https://doi.org/10.15398/jlm.v12i2.351
Hood, W. W., & Wilson, C. S. (2001). The literature of bibliometrics, scientometrics, and informetrics. Scientometrics, 52(2), 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017919924342
Hüning, M., & Booij, G. (2014). From compounding to derivation the emergence of derivational affixes through “constructionalization.” Folia Linguistica, 48(2), 579–604. https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2014.019
Jaradat, A., & Alkhawaja, L. (2024). A split morphosyntactic analysis of diminutives in two Arabic varieties. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2431461
Kleineberg, D. (2023). Collection nouns as a derivational category in Spanish Analysing the productivity of collective suffixes on the basis of ad hoc constructs. In Constructional Approaches to Language (Vol. 34). https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.34.02kle
Kolbusz-Buda, J. (2024). Between compounding and phrasal derivation: Polish complex nouns in sam(o)-. Word Structure, 17(3), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2024.0240
Körtvélyessy, L., & Štekauer, P. (2020). Complex Words: Advances in Morphology. In Complex Words: Advances in Morphology. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108780643
Laks, L. (2024). Semantic transparency and doublet formation: the case of Hebrew location nouns. Morphology, 34(3), 219–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-024-09421-2
Layes, S., Khenfour, H., Lalonde, R., & Rebai, M. (2019). Orthographic and Morphological Masked Priming Effects in Arabic: Evidence from Lexical Decision Task in Children with and Without Dyslexia. Reading Psychology, 40(3), 243–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2019.1614127
Liceras, J. M., & Klassen, R. (2019). Compounding and derivation:On the “promiscuity” of derivational affixes. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 9(1), 42–72. https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.16026
Lieber, R. (2017). Derivational Morphology. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.248
Lieber, R., & Plag, I. (2022). The semantics of conversion nouns and -ing nominalizations: A quantitative and theoretical perspective. Journal of Linguistics, 58(2), 307–343. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226721000311
Luschützky, H. C. (2015). Word-formation in natural morphology. Word-Formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, 1, 123–144. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110246254-011/HTML
Morita, J. (2024). Corpus-based Research into Derivational Morphology: A Comparative Study of Japanese and English Verbalization. Proceedings of the International Conference Computational Linguistics in Bulgaria, 178–186.
Müller, P. O., Ohnheiser, I., Olsen, S., & Rainer, F. (2016). Word-formation: An international handbook of the languages of Europe. In Word-Formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe (Vol. 5). https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110424942
Nugraha, D. S. (2021). Morphosemantic Features of Derivational Affix {Me(N)-} in The Indonesian Denumeral Verb Constructions. Sirok Bastra, 9(2), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.37671/sb.v9i2.317
Nugraha, D. S. (2024a). A Morphological Analysis of the Indonesian Suffixation: A Look at the Different Types of Affixes and Their Semantic Changes. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 24(4), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2024-2404-07
Nugraha, D. S. (2024b). Analyzing Prefix /me(N)-/ in the Indonesian Affixation: A Corpus-Based Morphology. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 14(6), 1697–1711. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1406.10
Pustejovsky, J. (2020). The Generative Lexicon. The Generative Lexicon. https://doi.org/10.7551/MITPRESS/3225.001.0001
Royle, P., & Steinhauer, K. (2023). Neural Correlates of Morphology Computation and Representation. In Neuromethods (Vol. 202). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3263-5_14
Sooryamoorthy, R. (2020). Scientometrics for the Humanities and Social Sciences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003110415
Steinhauer, A. (2015). Clipping. Word-Formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, 1, 352–363. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110246254-021
Štekauer, P. (2015). Backformation. Word-Formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, 1, 340–352. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110246254-020
Stephany, U. (2021). The development of derivation in early Greek first language acquisition. In Language Acquisition and Language Disorders (Vol. 66). https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.66.02ste
Stewart, J., Brown, D., Bennett, P., Robles-García, P., Sánchez-Gutiérrez, C. H., Marcos Miguel, N., Vitta, J. P., Nicklin, C., Stoeckel, T., & McLean, S. (2023). The contribution of affixes to productive English vocabulary knowledge for Chinese, German and Spanish learners: A comparison. System, 115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103035
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2023). VOSviewer (1.6.20). Universiteit Leiden.
van Klinken, C. W., & Hajek, J. (2020). Double agent, double cross? Or how a suffix changes nature in an isolating language: Dór in Tetun Dili. In Typological Studies in Language (Vol. 129). https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.129.08kli
Vasilogamvrakis, N., & Sfakakis, M. (2024). Ontological Modeling of Lists for Modern Greek Derivation. In Communications in Computer and Information Science: Vol. 2048 CCIS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65990-4_16
Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2019). Field Normalization of Scientometric Indicators (pp. 281–300). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_11
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Danang Satria Nugraha
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
-
Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
