Unpacking the Kurikulum Merdeka in Acehnese Schools: Implementation and Challenges in Foreign Language Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v13i4.14560Keywords:
Kurikulum Merdeka, Language learning, Language proficiency, Acehnese schools, Innovative educationAbstract
This study investigates the implementation of the Kurikulum Merdeka to improve students' foreign language proficiency and examines the challenges faced by language teachers in its application within Acehnese schools. The selected schools represent diverse geographical contexts, including urban, suburban, and boarding schools, allowing for a comparative analysis of implementation strategies. In-depth, semi-structured interviews with ten foreign language teachers (English and Arabic), school principals, and staff provided qualitative data, supplemented by field notes, class discussion transcriptions, and textbook reviews. Findings show disparities in curriculum implementation by school type and location, with challenges including limited resources, insufficient training, and complexity, especially in under-resourced schools. However, the curriculum's student-centered, goal-oriented approach is seen as transformative for language classrooms. This study contributes to the literature on curriculum implementation and language education as well as providing insights for educational policymakers. It also provides practical recommendations for improving the integration of the Kurikulum Merdeka in Acehnese schools and ensuring its successful adoption in language education.
References
Abdullahi, N. J. K. (2022). Curriculum Management Strategies and Effective Implementation of Universal Basic Education in Nigeria. Profesi Pendidikan Dasar, 9(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.23917/ppd.v9i1.18016
Aslan, A., & Zhu, C. (2017). Investigating variables predicting Turkish pre‐service teachers’ integration of ICT into teaching practices. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 552–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12437
Assunção Flores, M. (2005). Teachers’ views on recent curriculum changes: Tensions and challenges. The Curriculum Journal, 16(3), 401–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170500256479
Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573
Bell, S. (2010). Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415
Bümen, N. T., & Holmqvist, M. (2022). Teachers’ sense-making and adapting of the national curriculum: A multiple case study in Turkish and Swedish contexts. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 54(6), 832–851. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2022.2121178
Charalambous, C. Y., & Hill, H. C. (2012). Teacher knowledge, curriculum materials, and quality of instruction: Unpacking a complex relationship. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(4), 443–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2011.650215
Creswell, J. (2007). Creswell, J. W. (2014). A concise introduction to... - Google Scholar.
Dari, W., Hidayat, S., & Wulandari, E. (2024). The Understanding by Design Strategy in 21st-Century Education. Biosfer: Jurnal Tadris Biologi, 14(2), 169. https://doi.org/10.24042/biosfer.v14i2.15818
Dewi, M. R., & Arifin, Z. (2024). Analysis of 21st Century Skills in the Implementation of Project Based Learning in Biology Learning Merdeka Curriculum. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(4), 2118–2128. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i4.5941
Gouëdard, P., Pont, B., Hyttinen, S., & Huang, P. (2020). Curriculum reform: A literature review to support effective implementation (OECD Education Working Papers No. 239; OECD Education Working Papers, Vol. 239). https://doi.org/10.1787/efe8a48c-en
Hakan, K., & Seval, F. (2011). CIPP evaluation model scale: Development, reliability and validity. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 592–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.146
Harris, R., & Graham, S. (2019). Engaging with curriculum reform: Insights from English history teachers’ willingness to support curriculum change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 51(1), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2018.1513570
Howard, S. K., Tondeur, J., Ma, J., & Yang, J. (2021). What to teach? Strategies for developing digital competency in preservice teacher training. Computers & Education, 165, 104149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104149
Krishnapatria, K. (2021). Merdeka Belajar-Kampus Merdeka (MBKM) Curriculum In English Studies Program: Challenge And Opportunities. 4.
Lestari, M. B., & Margana, M. (2024). Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) Implementation In Kurikulum Merdeka: A Lesson From English Teachers’ Voices. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 12(4), 1657. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v12i4.11266
M Francom, G. (2016). Barriers to Technology use in Large and Small School Districts. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 15, 577–591. https://doi.org/10.28945/3596
Mathura, P. (2019). Teachers’ Perspectives on a Curriculum Change: A Trinidad and Tobago Case Study. International Journal of Innovative Business Strategies, 5(1), 252–263. https://doi.org/10.20533/ijibs.2046.3626.2019.0035
Mctighe, J., & Wiggins, G. (2014). Improve Curriculum, Assessment, and Instruction Using the Understanding by Design® Framework.
Okojie, M. U., Bastas, M., & Miralay, F. (2022). Using Curriculum Mapping as a Tool to Match Student Learning Outcomes and Social Studies Curricula. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 850264. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.850264
Pertiwi, A. K., & Pusparini, R. (2021). Vocational High School English Teachers’ Perspectives On “Merdeka Belajar” Curriculum. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(5), 1982–1992. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v3i5.672
Reza, F., Rohmah, Z., & Abdullah, N. N. (2023). Challenges in Implementing Kurikulum Merdeka for EFL Teachers. JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 10(2), 439–469. https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v10i2.1899
Sibuea, A. M., Amin, M., Mustaqim, B., & Tumanggor, G. (2023). The Evaluation of Implementation Merdeka Curriculum at The Centre of Excellence Vocational High School. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 9(4), 1280. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v9i4.8589
Sofiana, N., Mubarok, H., & Yuliasri, I. (2019). English Language Teaching in Secondary Schools: An Analysis of the Implementation of Indonesian ELT 2013 Curriculum. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 1533–1544. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12198a
Supianto, Sri, M., Jenny Indrastoeti Siti, P., Siti, I., Sukarno, & Hasan, M. (2024). Exploring teacher acceptance of the merdeka curriculum in Indonesia: A diffusion of innovation analysis. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 6(12), 2024267. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2024267
Tomlinson, C. A., & Imbeau, M. B. (2010). Leading and managing a differentiated classroom. ASCD.
Warsi, L. Q., & Rani, Y. (2024). Analysis of Teachers’ Readiness in Using Digital Technology for Students’ Learning: Problems and Potential Solutions. Human Nature Journal of Social Sciences, 5(2), 292–305. https://doi.org/10.71016/hnjss/t32ny040
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design, Expanded 2nd Edition.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (Sixth edition). SAGE.
Yusa, I. M. M., Yusuf, M., Rahman, A., Aniati, A., & Supriyanto, D. (2023). The Challenges and Opportunities of Kurikulum Merdeka Implementation in Indonesian Schools.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Faizatul Husna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
-
Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
